Dieter Kluenter wrote:
Am Mon, 17 Jan 2011 13:12:24 +0100
schrieb Pierangelo Masarati <masarati(a)aero.polimi.it>:
> Dieter Kluenter wrote:
>> Am Sat, 15 Jan 2011 18:01:31 +0100 (CET)
>> schrieb masarati(a)aero.polimi.it:
>>
>>>> Am Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:38:31 -0800
>>>> schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> --On Friday, January 14, 2011 6:25 PM +0100 Dieter Kluenter
>>>>> <dieter(a)dkluenter.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:08:23 -0800
>>>>>> schrieb Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)zimbra.com>:
[...]
> cannot reproduce; I built re24 with all backends/overlays built as
> dynamic modules and -DBDB_MONITOR_IDX and this test seems to work
> fine, including correctly populating the olmBDBNotIndexed attribute
> for non-indexed searches. Same when using exactly the same of your
> configure. Any other hint?
Unfortunately I have no hint. In the last few days I have compiled re24
multiple times always with the same result. OS and software are
installed on bare metal, not a virtual machine, all I can think of is
the btrfs file system. OTOH I just compiled and tested successfully HEAD
of today, with the only difference ext4 file system.
Another possible difference is that I used no optimization (-O0 -g)
because I need to be able to step in with gdb.
p.