Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
> Discussed this very briefly with Howard at LDAPcon 2007 based on an idea
> of Steve:
> Support for dITStructureRules and nameForms is still in OpenLDAP's TODO.
> In the meanwhile slapd could accept definitions for both in slapd.conf
> and simply pass them on to a schema-aware LDAP client for informational
> purpose without enforcing them. Same function like rootDSE <file> in
One could implement them in a fashion similar to ditContentRules...
(server wide instead of subtree specfication wide).
So you're voting against the approach suggested above?