12 Sep
2007
12 Sep
'07
12:52 a.m.
Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 3:13 PM, Michael Ströder wrote:
Discussed this very briefly with Howard at LDAPcon 2007 based on an idea of Steve:
Support for dITStructureRules and nameForms is still in OpenLDAP's TODO.
In the meanwhile slapd could accept definitions for both in slapd.conf and simply pass them on to a schema-aware LDAP client for informational purpose without enforcing them. Same function like rootDSE <file> in slapd.conf.
Opinions?
One could implement them in a fashion similar to ditContentRules... (server wide instead of subtree specfication wide).
So you're voting against the approach suggested above?
Ciao, Michael.