openldap-devel

openldap-devel@openldap.org

1416 discussions

"Upgrading from 2.3.x" section in Changes Appendix for Admin Guide
by Gavin Henry 03 Sep '07

03 Sep '07

Hi All, I think it's worth adding an upgrading section, as I'm just playing with a copy of a live 2.3.38 system and an upgrade to LDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 is giving: olcReplicationInterval: value #0: <olcReplicationInterval> keyword is obsolete (ignored) str2entry: invalid value for attributeType objectClass #0 (syntax 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38) => ldif_enum_tree: failed to read entry for /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.d/cn=config/cn=include{0}.ldif slaptest: bad configuration file! Admittedly, no slapcat was done as the bdb env is the same, but thought I'd do what a normal user would ;-) Should we list obsolete values from bconfig.c that will apply and discuss/present the best way to upgrade? Thoughts? -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/

2 12

Re: "Upgrading from 2.3.x" section in Changes Appendix for Admin Guide
by Dieter Kluenter 03 Sep '07

03 Sep '07

"Dieter Kluenter" <dieter(a)dkluenter.de> writes: > Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> writes: > >> Gavin Henry wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> I think it's worth adding an upgrading section, as I'm just playing >>> with a >>> copy of a live 2.3.38 system and an upgrade to LDAP_REL_ENG_2_4 is giving: >>> olcReplicationInterval: value #0: <olcReplicationInterval> keyword is >>> obsolete (ignored) >>> str2entry: invalid value for attributeType objectClass #0 (syntax >>> 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.38) >>> => ldif_enum_tree: failed to read entry for >>> /usr/local/etc/openldap/slapd.d/cn=config/cn=include{0}.ldif >>> slaptest: bad configuration file! >>> Admittedly, no slapcat was done as the bdb env is the same, but >>> thought >>> I'd do what a normal user would ;-) >>> Should we list obsolete values from bconfig.c that will apply and >>> discuss/present the best way to upgrade? >> >> Obsolete values don't matter; like the message said - it was simply ignored. >> >> The problem you ran into here is that 2.3.x had cn=include entries >> (which were also ignored in 2.3) but support for them was axed in >> 2.4. So, just delete all the cn=include* files from the config >> directory. With HEAD i have similar problems # ./slapcat -l /tmp/020907.ldif str2entry: invalid value for attributeType olcDbConfig #11 (syntax 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15) => ldif_enum_tree: failed to read entry for /opt/openldap/etc/openldap/slapd.d/cn=config/olcDatabase={1}hdb.ldif slapcat: bad configuration file! magenta:/opt/openldap/sbin # -Dieter -- Dieter Klünter | Systemberatung http://www.dkluenter.de GPG Key ID:8EF7B6C6

3 4

Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd bconfig.c
by Gavin Henry 02 Sep '07

02 Sep '07

<quote who="hyc(a)OpenLDAP.org"> > Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/servers/slapd > > Modified Files: > bconfig.c 1.299 -> 1.300 > > Log Message: > Partially resurrect cn=Include stuff - parse from LDIF and ignore. > ;-)

1 0

LDAP_REL_ENG_2_4
by Quanah Gibson-Mount 01 Sep '07

01 Sep '07

OpenLDAP Release Engineering 2.4 has been sync'd with HEAD. Please check it out and test that builds and functionality work as expected. I've tested so far on MAC OS X x86. Thanks! --Quanah -- Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

4 10

BerkeleyDB again
by Howard Chu 31 Aug '07

31 Aug '07

Our BDB detection macro has explicit checks for -ldb45, -ldb44, ... -ldb41 before falling back to -ldb4. So right now while I have db46 (and older versions) installed on the system, RE24 configure picks the wrong library. I think we should drop the link tests for minor version and only check for -ldb4. Another alternative would be to move the db.h tests earlier and look for the library that matches the header file version number. Any thoughts? -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 1

Performance issue with In-Memory BDB
by Suhel Momin 31 Aug '07

31 Aug '07

Hi, I have made changes such that backend BDB ( ver 4.5 ) resides in memory instead of on disk . This is with default slapd configuration. I was hoping to have a better performance with this. But what I now see is that do_add takes much more time then what it use to take when BDB was on-Disk. Indexing is done on objectclass in both the cases. Any pointers on why this could be an issue? Regards, Suhel

3 2

Reminder: 10 Year Anniversary next year
by Gavin Henry 27 Aug '07

27 Aug '07

Dear All, Just a reminder for next year for us to think of something grand to do! ;-) Gavin. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/

5 7

Re: commit: openldap-guide/ preamble.sdf
by Gavin Henry 26 Aug '07

26 Aug '07

<quote who="kurt(a)OpenLDAP.org"> > Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/openldap-guide > > Modified Files: > preamble.sdf 1.90 -> 1.91 > > Log Message: > Don't comment on software produced by others. Those who desire to use a > network analyzer are likely to know which ones are or are not "great". Understood, but how far does that go? Does that mean we can't talk about "tail", as it "wasn't made here"? It's a debugging section so I think referencing Open Source tools should be allowed. My 2 pence. Night. > > > CVS Web URLs: > http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/?cvsroot=OpenLDAP-guide > http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/preamble.sdf?cvsroot=OpenLDAP-guide > > Changes are generally available on cvs.openldap.org (and CVSweb) > within 30 minutes of being committed. >

2 1

Re: commit: openldap-guide/admin troubleshooting.sdf
by Gavin Henry 26 Aug '07

26 Aug '07

<quote who="kurt(a)OpenLDAP.org"> > Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/openldap-guide/admin > > Modified Files: > troubleshooting.sdf 1.9 -> 1.10 > > Log Message: > Don't comment on software produced by others. Those who desire to use a > network analyzer are likely to know which ones are or are not "great". I should have discussed and understood the charter. Same reasons why we link to the TLS FAQ entry. Gavin. > > > CVS Web URLs: > http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/admin/?cvsroot=OpenLDAP-guide > http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/admin/troubleshooting.sdf?cvsroot=… > > Changes are generally available on cvs.openldap.org (and CVSweb) > within 30 minutes of being committed. >

1 0

Is contextCSN SINGLE-VALUE?
by Pierangelo Masarati 26 Aug '07

26 Aug '07

I'm seeing it multiple-valued in some bulk testing I'm doing; does it make any sense? Its specification, in schema_prep.c, doesn't explicitly set the SINGLE-VALUE constraint. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ---------------------------------------

2 6

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-devel