openldap-devel

openldap-devel@openldap.org

1443 discussions

Re: OpenLDAP Roadmap - What do we want to see in 2.5.x?
by Gavin Henry 21 Nov '07

21 Nov '07

<quote who="Michael Ströder"> > Gavin Henry wrote: >> Thought I'd start the thread. > > Gavin, do you really think it's already time for this? Umm, yeah. There's been an ITS for the very out of date one on our site for ages now. It doesn't have to be soley for 2.5.x, 2.4.x as well. > > I'd rather be curious to know what items in doc/devel/todo will be done > in 2.4. Re docs, just the empty or "LATER" sections to complete. > Personally I'd like to see (optional) support for DIT structure > rules and name forms. ok, then that's a start. That could be part of the roadmap for 2.4, as there isn't anything for 2.4.x/2.5.x > But I'm not a C programmer. I can only help with > testing. And docs! ;-) It would be much appreciated if anyone would pick up a Overlay and/or backend section. They don't take long. I'm currently working on the Replication sections. Thanks, Gavin.

1 0

OpenLDAP Roadmap - What do we want to see in 2.5.x?
by Gavin Henry 21 Nov '07

21 Nov '07

Thought I'd start the thread. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. OpenLDAP Engineering Team. E ghenry(a)OpenLDAP.org Community developed LDAP software. http://www.openldap.org/project/

2 1

OpenLDAP Developers Day?
by Gavin Henry 21 Nov '07

21 Nov '07

Any thoughts on a when/where for next year? Gavin. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. OpenLDAP Engineering Team. E ghenry(a)OpenLDAP.org Community developed LDAP software. http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: ordered indexing for integers
by Gavin Henry 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

<quote who="Howard Chu"> > Aaron Richton wrote: >> Agreed that this would be a useful addition (I've run into/designed >> around >> this a couple times). To answer "is it a big deal that we lose binary >> compat with RE23," I don't consider that a strong issue at all. We >> always >> tell people to slapcat/slapadd as part of a release change, and this >> would >> be covered in that recommendation. My bigger concern would be what the >> 2.4.6 -> 2.4.7 (or whenever this hits) procedure would look like. i.e., >> are you proposing dropping read support for the RE23-style databases, so >> that a 2.4.6 -> 2.4.7 would require a 2.4.6 slapcat? Users might not be >> used to that. > > Yes, dropping support for RE23 format index files. > > In fact you would only need to run slapindex to regenerate them, and it > would > only be needed if you have presence indexing enabled on general > attributes, or > equality indexing on integer attributes. Since presence indexing is > typically > not too useful to begin with, I think this is a small enough issue that we > can > cover it in the 2.4.7 release announcement. And a wee note in the Upgrading/Migrating section of the Admin Guide. Saying that, 2.3.x -> 2.4.x will be a slapcat, so maybe no point. Gavin.

1 0

Re: commit: ldap/tests/scripts defines.sh test050-syncrepl-multimaster
by Gavin Henry 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

<quote who="Howard Chu"> > Aaron Richton wrote: >> Yes, on x86_64 Fedora 8. >> >> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Gavin Henry wrote: >> >>> Anyone else getting this hanging on i386? >>>> test050 extended to run with 3 slapd instances. Please test. > > Fixed now in HEAD. I guess we need an ITS for this. Will do one now. > > -- > -- Howard Chu > Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com > Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ > Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/ >

1 0

Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd bconfig.c connection.c syncrepl.c
by Gavin Henry 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

hyc(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: > Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/servers/slapd > > Modified Files: > bconfig.c 1.317 -> 1.318 > connection.c 1.408 -> 1.409 > syncrepl.c 1.369 -> 1.370 > > Log Message: > Fix test050 > Ah, excellent! So my first test mod was ok, just a wee bug in the underlying code. Nice to know. All passes here. Thanks for spotting and fixing this. Gavin. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/

1 0

Re: commit: ldap/tests/scripts defines.sh test050-syncrepl-multimaster
by Gavin Henry 20 Nov '07

20 Nov '07

Anyone else getting this hanging on i386? -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/ <quote who="ghenry(a)OpenLDAP.org"> > Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/tests/scripts > > Modified Files: > defines.sh 1.159 -> 1.160 > test050-syncrepl-multimaster 1.5 -> 1.6 > > Log Message: > test050 extended to run with 3 slapd instances. Please test. > > CVS Web URLs: > http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/tests/scripts/ > http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/tests/scripts/defines.sh > http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/tests/scripts/test050-syncrepl-mul… > > Changes are generally available on cvs.openldap.org (and CVSweb) > within 30 minutes of being committed. >

3 2

Re: commit: ldap/tests/scripts defines.sh test050-syncrepl-multimaster
by Gavin Henry 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

<quote who="Aaron Richton"> > Yes, on x86_64 Fedora 8. Yeah, it's sometimes happening on i386 F8 too. Just passed now though: [ghenry@suretec tests]$ ./run test050 Cleaning up test run directory leftover from previous run. Running ./scripts/test050-syncrepl-multimaster... running defines.sh Initializing server configurations... Starting producer slapd on TCP/IP port 9011... Using ldapsearch to check that producer slapd is running... Inserting syncprov overlay on producer... Starting consumer slapd on TCP/IP port 9012... Using ldapsearch to check that consumer slapd is running... Configuring syncrepl on consumer... Starting consumer2 slapd on TCP/IP port 9013... Using ldapsearch to check that consumer2 slapd is running... Configuring syncrepl on consumer2... Adding schema and databases on producer... Using ldapadd to populate producer... Waiting 20 seconds for syncrepl to receive changes... Using ldapsearch to check that syncrepl received database changes... Using ldapsearch to check that syncrepl received database changes on consumer2... Using ldapsearch to read config from the producer... Using ldapsearch to read config from the consumer... Using ldapsearch to read config from consumer2... Filtering producer results... Filtering consumer results... Filtering consumer2 results... Comparing retrieved configs from producer and consumer... Comparing retrieved configs from producer and consumer2... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the producer... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the consumer... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the consumer2... Filtering producer results... Filtering consumer results... Filtering consumer2 results... Comparing retrieved entries from producer and consumer... Comparing retrieved entries from producer and consumer2... Restarting servers... Starting producer slapd on TCP/IP port 9011... Using ldapsearch to check that producer slapd is running... Waiting 5 seconds for slapd to start... Starting consumer slapd on TCP/IP port 9012... Using ldapsearch to check that consumer slapd is running... Starting consumer2 slapd on TCP/IP port 9013... Using ldapsearch to check that consumer2 slapd is running... Waiting 10 seconds for servers to resync... >>>>> Test succeeded

1 0

Re: Playing with MMR in HEAD
by Gavin Henry 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

<quote who="Howard Chu"> > Gavin Henry wrote: >> I am just working on a test053-syncrepl-three-multimasters for others to >> test. > > It would be sufficient to just extend test050. OK. I copied test050 to test053 and added to defines.sh. It completed, I'm just testing. Then I'll rename it to test050. ITS for this?

1 0

Re: Playing with MMR in HEAD
by Gavin Henry 19 Nov '07

19 Nov '07

So, If I start con2 up and then the pro/con, they die after a while with: lt-slapd: encode.c:346: ber_put_ostring: Assertion `str != ((void *)0)' failed. In: tests/testrun/{con,con2,pro} I'm running: ../../../servers/slapd/slapd -F slapd.d/ -h ldap://:9011/ -d 256 ../../../servers/slapd/slapd -F slapd.d/ -h ldap://:9012/ -d 256 ../../../servers/slapd/slapd -F slapd.d/ -h ldap://:9013/ -d 256 etc. Complete data: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/three_MM.tar.gz I am just working on a test053-syncrepl-three-multimasters for others to test. Gavin. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/ <quote who="Gavin Henry"> > Also, > > With the 3 running slapd instances now, switching a drink attribute caused > a crash on the con2: > > lt-slapd: encode.c:346: ber_put_ostring: Assertion `str != ((void *)0)' > failed. > Aborted > > I'll collect more complete debugging info as I continue. > > Thanks. > > -- > Kind Regards, > > Gavin Henry. > Managing Director. > > T +44 (0) 1224 279484 > M +44 (0) 7930 323266 > F +44 (0) 1224 824887 > E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com > > Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). > > http://www.suretecsystems.com/ > > <quote who="Gavin Henry"> >> Hi All, >> >> I'm playing with test050, i.e. running it, copying con directory to con2 >> and then starting the original provider and consumer up. Then starting >> up >> con2 on ldap://:9013/ >> >> All fine, then I go about adding a new syncrepl on cn=config and >> dc=example,dc=com pointing to ldap://:9013/ >> >> I'm not using LDIF, just messing with JXplorer. >> >> Everything worked ok, with a couple of crashes at the point I added a >> new >> syncrepl on con2 point to itself. >> >> Both pro and con died with: >> >> lt-slapd: attr.c:481: attr_merge: Assertion `( nvals == ((void *)0) && >> (*a)->a_nvals == (*a)->a_vals ) || ( nvals != ((void *)0) && ( ( >> (*a)->a_vals == ((void *)0) && (*a)->a_nvals == ((void *)0) ) || ( >> (*a)->a_nvals != (*a)->a_vals ) ) )' failed. >> Aborted >> >> I guess I should pay attention more to the order in test050 and timing. >> >> Lastly, how do we define test050 to be a multimaster test when there are >> only two instances of slapd? >> >> Is it because we have 2 sycnrepl on cn=config and then another two on >> the >> bdb backends? I thought a test for this would include at least 3 running >> slapd instances? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Gavin. >> >> -- >> Kind Regards, >> >> Gavin Henry. >> Managing Director. >> >> T +44 (0) 1224 279484 >> M +44 (0) 7930 323266 >> F +44 (0) 1224 824887 >> E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com >> >> Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). >> >> http://www.suretecsystems.com/ >> >> >> > >

2 1

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-devel