openldap-devel March 2019

openldap-devel@openldap.org

7 participants
5 discussions

asserts and manadatory build instructions (was ITS#8240)
by Michael Ströder 04 Nov '21

04 Nov '21

hyc(a)symas.com wrote in ITS#8240: > Our patch response was too hasty. There is no OpenLDAP bug here, the real > issue is production binaries being built with asserts enabled instead of > compiling with -DNDEBUG. That's an issue for packagers and distros to resolve. > Closing this ITS, not an OpenLDAP bug. Maybe I missed something. But this is the first time I've heard about -DNDEBUG being mandatory when compiling binary packages for production use. Does it have other effects? … [View More]

1 1

Fwd: (ITS#9001) avl in libldap?
by Ondřej Kuzník 29 Mar '19

29 Mar '19

> If a client has thousands or more requests in flight at the same time, it has to > look up the right request every time it receives a response. As the requests are > tracked in a doubly-linked list, lookup tends to take O(n) steps whichever > direction we take and things generally get out of hand from there on. > > The linked branch puts them into a TAvl for quicker lookup, with another commit > to let people test as (t)avl code is part of liblutil at the moment. Is it … [View More]

1 0

libldap vs libldap_r ?
by Howard Chu 19 Mar '19

19 Mar '19

I noticed that OpenSSL 1.1 now has an explicit dependency on Pthreads. Which means that now even our "non-threaded" libldap, when built with OpenSSL, must actually be linked with the threads library. In this age of multicore processors, is it really important to have a single-threaded LDAP library any more? Should we just make libldap_r become the standard library? -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ … [View More]

6 6

Google's "Season of Docs"
by Michael Ströder 18 Mar '19

18 Mar '19

HI! Does anybody here think it's worth to give this a try? https://developers.google.com/season-of-docs/docs/ Ciao, Michael.

3 2

ITS review
by Quanah Gibson-Mount 12 Mar '19

12 Mar '19

There have been some reports coming in to the ITS system that likely should go into OpenLDAP 2.4.48/LMDB 0.9.23. These are: ITS#8969 - Tweak to LMDB page splits (already committed to LMDB RE0.9) ITS#8968 - ASYNC connect mode does not work on Solaris (<https://github.com/quanah/openldap-scratch/tree/its8968>) ITS#8967 - back-mdb "unchecked" limits broken with particular search scopes. Needs fix. ITS#8957 - ASYNC TLS mode is broken (<https://github.com/quanah/openldap-scratch/… [View More]

4 7

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-devel March 2019