openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
21513 discussions

[Issue 7226] olcAuditlogFile should be single valued, but accepts multiple values (additional values ignored)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7226 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED Resolution|TEST |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9556] New: slapd-config should return invalidAttributeSyntax if parsing schema description fails
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9556 Issue ID: 9556 Summary: slapd-config should return invalidAttributeSyntax if parsing schema description fails Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- I'm currently testing error handling and interacting with LDAP clients (e.g. my web2ldap). Sending an invalid attribute type description results in an error (as expected) returned by slapd-config: RESULT tag=103 err=80 qtime=0.000032 etime=0.001271 text=olcAttributeTypes: Unexpected token before SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 ) But result code other(80) seems not very useful. It's too unspecific to decide on specific error handling. It would be much more useful if slapd-config returns invalidAttributeSyntax(21) in this case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9959] New: Expose the lloadd connection endpoints in cn=monitor for identification
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9959 Issue ID: 9959 Summary: Expose the lloadd connection endpoints in cn=monitor for identification Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- ITS#9600 introduces a way to operate on lloadd connections, however it is impossible to identify which socket this actually corresponds to. While we're at it, might also expose the current bound identity there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10266] New: Adopt broader RFC4511 NoD interpretation on lloadd's client side
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10266 Issue ID: 10266 Summary: Adopt broader RFC4511 NoD interpretation on lloadd's client side Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Server side, lloadd has long implemented a broad interpretation of NoD unsolicited response handling: when the message is issued, no new requests are accepted on the session however the client and server are both free to keep the session open if there are any operations that have not resolved yet. The server is still expected to close the connection as soon as no operations are still pending. This seems to interoperate with known clients. Those that want to will close the session immediately, unaware of this possibility, those that also want to interpret RFC 4511 this way can choose to wait for existing operations to resolve. This ticket is to track the lloadd's implementation of the client side of this - when receiving a NoD message, we don't close the connection immediately+unconditionally either but are willing to wait. Related functionality: - if connection was a bind connection processing a multi-stage SASL bind, the bind should fail if/when the client attempts to progress it - clients assigned to this connection through coherence at least 'connection' are also marked closing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10502] New: feature proxyauthz should become default
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10502 Issue ID: 10502 Summary: feature proxyauthz should become default Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Most stock lloadd deployments are against OpenLDAP, but since "feature" keyword doesn't allow "off-switches", proxyauthz has had to have been an "off by default" thing. This is insecure and probably a footgun for many. We'll have to introduce a new configuration option to do this, one that allows for gentler evolution. This also allows us to reject a bindconf+no_proxyauthz combinations if we force the rare admins who genuinely need it (no proxyauthz support in upstreams) to opt in explicitly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10546] New: ldap_explode_dn result is not released in the interactive test client
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10546 Issue ID: 10546 Summary: ldap_explode_dn result is not released in the interactive test client Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1489378385(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- URL: https://github.com/openldap/openldap/blob/8afcbe9e04f1a40f03cea51c57418b05f… Description: Source revision: 8afcbe9e04f1a40f03cea51c57418b05f86e8f44 Affected file: libraries/libldap/test.c Affected lines: 472-478 Source-level observation: The interactive test client's E command calls ldap_explode_dn() and stores the returned NULL-terminated array in exdn. It prints the array elements and then leaves the switch case without releasing exdn. According to ldap_get_dn(3), the result returned by ldap_explode_dn() should be released with ldap_value_free(). The only reference to the allocated array is overwritten the next time the E command is executed. Steps to verify: 1. Build the libraries/libldap interactive test client with AddressSanitizer or LeakSanitizer enabled. 2. Start the test client. 3. Execute the E command and enter a valid DN, for example: cn=test,dc=example,dc=com 4. Repeat the E command several times. 5. Exit the client and inspect the sanitizer report or monitor its memory use. Actual result: Each E command allocates an exploded DN array that remains allocated until the process terminates. Expected result: The exploded DN array should be released after all of its elements have been printed. Impact: Repeated use of the E command increases the test client's memory consumption. Validation status: Confirmed by source review at the revision above. Runtime sanitizer validation is pending. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10517] New: mbedTLS doesn't verify certificate in reqcert try mode
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10517 Issue ID: 10517 Summary: mbedTLS doesn't verify certificate in reqcert try mode Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- When setting the authmode to OPTIONAL, mbedTLS documentation[0] says that it's the user's responsibility to check the verification result if they care. `reqcert try` does care, but mbedtls_ssl_get_verify_result is never called in that case and so an invalid cert is not detected (easy to test by changing line 204 in test067). [0]. https://os.mbed.com/teams/sandbox/code/mbedtls/docs/tip/ssl_8h.html#a569528… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9640] New: ACL privilege for MOD_INCREMENT
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9640 Issue ID: 9640 Summary: ACL privilege for MOD_INCREMENT Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- I'm using LDAP write operations with MOD_INCREMENT with pre-read-control for uidNumber/gidNumber generation. I'd like to limit write access to an Integer attribute "nextID" to MOD_INCREMENT, ideally even restricting the de-/increment value. (Uniqueness is achieved with slapo-unique anyway but still I'd like to avoid users messing with this attribute). IMHO the ideal solution would be a new privilege "i". Example for limiting write access to increment by one and grant read access for using read control: access to attrs=nextID val=1 by group=... =ri Example for decrementing by two without read: access to attrs=nextID val=-2 by group=... =i -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 7441] cn=config filters ignore {number}
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7441 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED Resolution|TEST |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10437] New: Let service manager know when we're about to pause
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Aug '26

07 Aug '26

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10437 Issue ID: 10437 Summary: Let service manager know when we're about to pause Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Entering a pause and waiting for a task (back-ldap result, ...) to finish looks exactly the same as slapd hanging, even cn=monitor will stop responding. If the sysadmin has systemd or another manager that we can tell this is about to happen, we might as well try. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs