https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10506
Issue ID: 10506
Summary: Remove back-sql from OpenLDAP 2.7
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
back-sql was deprecated with OpenLDAP 2.6. Remove it from OpenLDAP 2.7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8901
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|TEST |FIXED
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10460
Issue ID: 10460
Summary: Stray uses of fprintf in libldap
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.12
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: minor
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
avl.c, cyrus.c, error.c, ldap_sync.c, ldifutil.c contain uses of
`fprintf(stderr,...)` which should probably use Debug instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10310
Issue ID: 10310
Summary: Update pbkdf2 overlay so iterations can be
configurable
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: contrib
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
The pbkdf2 password hashing contrib overlay has the number of iterations hard
coded at 10,000. It would be helpful to update the module to allow this to be
configurable instead, as is done with other password hashing modules.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9577
Issue ID: 9577
Summary: slapd -V should be deprecated
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: smckinney(a)symas.com
Target Milestone: ---
Sometimes a user's (present one included) ignorance gets them in trouble
unnecessarily. The -V option is an example...
Normally, when one wants to determine the version of a process, they use -V, or
perhaps -v. With slapd, the daemon actually continues to run, which can have
negative consequences.
The doc clearly states that -VV is probably what the user wants, but is
counter-intutive. Who RTFM's before checking the version?
-V print version info (-VV exit afterwards, -VVV print
info about static overlays and backends)
I propose we eliminate the option to allow slapd to continue running after
displaying the version. Perhaps we eliminate the -V option entirely, or just
make it work the same as -VV.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10301
Issue ID: 10301
Summary: Use assertion control in lastbind chaining
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Take a setup with a bunch of consumers tracking lastbind information and
replicating this back from the provider. If a client sends a lot of successful
binds to it in a very short window, the changes might not have a chance to
replicate down so each of these binds has to trigger a new modification to be
forwarded.
This results in a lot of DB churn and replication traffic that is actually
meaningless (the pwdLastChange values before and after each of the mods will be
the same).
We probably can't avoid having to send something, but the change we send could
have an assertion control attached that lets the provider skip it if
pwdLastChange>=new_value, saving on all of the additional processing (and
additional useless replication traffic).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10278
Issue ID: 10278
Summary: Move away from python-ldap0 in the test suite
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: test suite
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
While python-ldap0 has a superior API, it seems the module is no longer
receiving any development. We should move our python test suite over to another
module that can be supported long-term.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9367
Issue ID: 9367
Summary: back-mdb: encryption support
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Need to add encryption support to the back-mdb backend, depends on issue#9364
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6151
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|TEST |FIXED
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.