openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20891 discussions

[Issue 10140] New: Add microsecond timestamp format for local file logging
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jun '24

20 Jun '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10140 Issue ID: 10140 Summary: Add microsecond timestamp format for local file logging Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: gnoe(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Add microsecond-level timestamps to local file logging. Format is: "YYYY-mm-ddTHH:MM:SS.ffffffZ" The attached patch file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Gregory Noe gnoe(a)symas.com. I have not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. The attached modifications to OpenLDAP Software are subject to the following notice: Copyright 2023 Gregory Noe Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted only as authorized by the OpenLDAP Public License. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10228] New: config LDAP_BACK_CONN_PRIV_MAX to higher value
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10228 Issue ID: 10228 Summary: config LDAP_BACK_CONN_PRIV_MAX to higher value Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.16 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: shaosong.li(a)salesforce.com Target Milestone: --- Hi, LDAP_BACK_CONN_PRIV_MAX parameter is set to 256 by below config, https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5/serv… Can we set this value to a higher value, such as 7k/10k, which is commonly used in PingDirectory. Any reason that we set this value to a low value like 256, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

2 8

[Issue 10060] New: libldap: ldap_result return value differs depending on if a search response is already in the response list or not
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10060 Issue ID: 10060 Summary: libldap: ldap_result return value differs depending on if a search response is already in the response list or not Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: david(a)hardeman.nu Target Milestone: --- ldap_result(3) is defined here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/libldap/… On this line, ldap_result will call wait4msg: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/libldap/… wait4msg is defined here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/libldap/… If a response for a given msgid is already stored in the response list, and all=1, the whole message chain will be returned by the call from wait4msg to chkResponseList here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/libldap/… And rc will be set on the next line to the head of the message chain. If a response for a given msgid is *not* already stored in the response list, wait4msg will eventually call try_read1msg here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/libldap/… If try_read1msg manages to receive the final search result message for a given msgid, it will be noted here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/libldap/… The whole chain will be returned here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/libldap/… And the return code will be the tag of the *last* message in the chain, as opposed to the *first* message in the chain: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/libldap/… Which will result in different return codes for chains of multiple messages (i.e. search results with all=1). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 14

[Issue 10138] New: Allow generating multiple nested read transactions from a write transaction
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Jun '24

18 Jun '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10138 Issue ID: 10138 Summary: Allow generating multiple nested read transactions from a write transaction Product: LMDB Version: 0.9.30 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: renault.cle(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hello, I have a feature request. Would it be possible to read a database from the point of view of a non-yet-committed write transaction? What I want to do is to write a lot of entries into a database, use a couple of threads to read those entries (using MDB_NOTLS) to generate a lot of new entries (that will be written to disk and then once the generation is done, drop the read-transaction handles and write (with MDB_APPEND) those new entries from disk into LMDB. This would have been possible if I had committed the first entries, but unfortunately, it is impossible. I need to do this in the same transaction. Have a great day, kero -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 12

[Issue 10225] New: tlso_session_pinning: will crash if digest/keyhash.bv_val is not properly initialized over the lifetime of the function
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Jun '24

07 Jun '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10225 Issue ID: 10225 Summary: tlso_session_pinning: will crash if digest/keyhash.bv_val is not properly initialized over the lifetime of the function Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: yaneurabeya(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- tlso_session_pinning(..) does not initialize the `digest` stack memory before referring to it later on in the function. This can result in a library crash if (for whatever reason) keyhash.bv_val fails to initialize properly on line 1191 [1]. This issue kind of goes hand in hand with bug 10224. 1. https://github.com/openldap/openldap/blob/15edb3b30f2b6a3dbdf77cc42d39466d5… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10221] New: Fix build script for 2.5.18
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jun '24

03 Jun '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10221 Issue ID: 10221 Summary: Fix build script for 2.5.18 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.17 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: delphij(a)freebsd.org Target Milestone: --- Hi, In revision 619afaccab5 (ITS#10177) an extra " was introduced, which will prevent configure script from working with FreeBSD's sh(1) (I suspect it would also break on other shell implementations). The fix is to delete that extra ". This affects OpenLDAP 2.5.18 only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10220] New: Feature Request: new option for append-only write transaction
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 May '24

31 May '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10220 Issue ID: 10220 Summary: Feature Request: new option for append-only write transaction Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: xhtang518(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- My project uses LMDB to store values larger than 100KB, and rarely delete values. So I can afford wasting some space on free pages, then LMDB can reduce 4KB-write operations and improve write performance when committing write transactions. I suppose this feature is not hard to implement: just pretend the free-list is empty in this transaction if the new option is present. Is this feature reasonable? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10182] New: slapo-alias doesn't work with static operational attributes
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10182 Issue ID: 10182 Summary: slapo-alias doesn't work with static operational attributes Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- It only checks in rs->sr_operational_attrs which is for dynamically generated opattrs, and ignores them if they're in the entry itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10104] New: Add alias overlay to contrib
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10104 Issue ID: 10104 Summary: Add alias overlay to contrib Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10188] New: autogroup doesn't allow a group to be a member of another group
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 21 May '24

21 May '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10188 Issue ID: 10188 Summary: autogroup doesn't allow a group to be a member of another group Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Try setting up autogroup (autogroup-attrset groupOfURLs memberURL member) and loading the following ldif. You'll notice that neither group is marked as a member: dn: cn=test objectClass: device dn: cn=group,cn=test objectClass: mygroupOfURLs memberURL: ldap:///cn=test??sub?(description=a member) memberURL: ldap:///cn=test??sub?(description=I'm in) description: a member dn: cn=member,cn=test objectClass: device description: I'm in dn: cn=another,cn=test objectClass: mygroupOfURLs memberURL: ldap:///cn=test??sub?(objectclass=groupOfURLs) description: I'm in Just set up mygroupOfURLs with at least a MAY that includes "cn $ description $ member $ memberURL" somehow, e.g. objectClass ( NetscapeLDAPobjectClass:33.1 NAME 'mygroupOfURLs' SUP groupofurls STRUCTURAL MAY member ) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs