https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9017
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |newstzpz(a)gmail.com
--- Comment #24 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
*** Issue 8530 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8453
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 8407 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8407
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |catwell(a)archlinux.us
--- Comment #3 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
*** Issue 8453 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8430
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #13 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
Too complex.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8417
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
The input file header already supports `mapsize=xxx` keyword, there's no reason
to set it or override it on the commandline.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8394
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |SUSPENDED
--- Comment #3 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
No test case provided
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8386
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
committed to mdb.master / mdb.master3 / mdb.RE/0.9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8322
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
The discrepancy is intentional, to force programmers to explicitly set a
mapsize instead of relying on the default.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8179
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
Rejecting this because it encourages the wrong style of usage.
The intended way to use LMDB is to simply set the mapsize to the
maximum amount of (allowed|available) storage, once, at creation
time and never touch it again. It's a simple matter to automate
checking the amount of free disk space and just using that as the
mapsize. Growing the map incrementally is wrong-headed and wasteful.
We've accommodated it only under duress thus far.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8060
Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |SUSPENDED
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #5 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
Suspending until IPR notice is provided.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.