https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10250
Issue ID: 10250
Summary: syncrepl_diff_entry assumes attributes come in the
same order
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
When trying to diff an entry, syncrepl_diff_entry explicitly assumes attribute
come in the same order. That's not always the case and could cause it to report
a spurious rewrite of the attribute.
Normally this is ok, unless the rewrite itself (not) occurring has other
side-effects, when it could cause issues. (e.g. a DB with memberof
inconsistencies being mysteriously repaired in some scenarios, which is how it
was found).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8905
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|TEST |FIXED
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10465
Issue ID: 10465
Summary: accesslog_purge mdb scheduling is unfair
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
On most systems, a running accesslog purge task on a back-mdb data will starve
other modifications for oxygen:
It issues deletes to the DB with a very narrow gap where it might be usefully
preempted, on a multi-CPU systems it usually manages to reacquire the TXN mutex
before another waiting thread can even wake up. Meanwhile a live modification
has to issue a modification to the original DB, then get to the point where it
waits to acquire a write TXN on the accesslog DB, all the while holding
li_rmutex preventing any other modification from getting under way. So even one
wins the mutex, another one is unlikely to do so straight away.
This means that write latencies can and usually do shoot through the roof until
the purge task finishes. If 1% of time is spent on write ops on average and an
accesslog purge is scheduled to run every 30 mins, that is ~18 seconds of work
for the purge task to remove those entries. On a busy system, write latencies
of above 1 second (which this can easily spiral to) might be unacceptable,
especially when ppolicy/lastbind etc. are configured.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9878
Issue ID: 9878
Summary: test043 failures in 2.5/2.6
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
With test043 update for ITS#9823, we manage to introduce a scenario where the
server is completely idle except for a runqueue change.
This is partly identical with ITS#9642 and a similar approach would work.
Except that changes our module facing ABI so might not be something we can
backport. For the streams we can't, we might have to change the test to make
the server not idle.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10073
Issue ID: 10073
Summary: database monitor | slapd fails to start when "database
ldap" without suffix exists
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.14
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: cyusedfzfb(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
As requested on the mailinglist, I am filing an issue for this behaviour:
Today setup the cn=Monitor backend, and after doing so, openldap failed to
start with:
backend_startup_one (type=monitor, suffix="cn=Monitor"): bi_db_open failed!
(-1)
The reason turned out to be: we had configured one of our databases ("database
ldap") without a suffix.
After I added a suffix, openldap started, and cn=Monitor worked as expected.
It would be nice if this error message could become a little bit more specific.
:-)
Also: we've had the "database ldap" without a suffix in production working for
many years. Perhaps cn=Monitor should be able to deal with that config as
well..?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10084
Issue ID: 10084
Summary: Move away from DIGEST-MD5 as a default in the test
suite
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: test suite
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
cyrus-sasl seem on the verge or removing the DIGEST-MD5 mechanism from 2.2
onwards. As such we should update our defaults in a couple of our test scripts
for master/2.7 at least. Are SCRAM mechanisms the go-to these days?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10415
Issue ID: 10415
Summary: Allow limiting the buffers for data pending to be sent
to client
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: lloadd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
In many scenarios it is more useful to limit the amount of data we buffer to be
written to the client's socket even if it means that sometimes a connection
might have to be dropped abruptly to enforce this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10507
Issue ID: 10507
Summary: Remove back-perl from OpenLDAP 2.7
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
OpenLDAP 2.6 deprecated back-perl, so remove it from the 2.7 release branch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10361
Issue ID: 10361
Summary: lapo-auditlog: Add olcAuditLogNonBlocking to avoid
blocking when logging to named pipes
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: a.cudbardb(a)freeradius.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 1081
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1081&action=edit
Patch adding olcAuditlogNonBlocking and a tests for slapo-auditlog
The default behaviour of fopen() when called on a named pipe which does not
have any reader, is to block, until a reader opens the pipe. This in turn
blocks slapo-auditlog when it attempts to write output, and prevents slapd
processing requests. Depending on how critical the audit log is, it may be
preferable to discard audit log output and continue processing requests if
there's no reader available which olcAuditLogNonBlocking: TRUE allows.
For clarity the call to fopen() is removed and replaced with open()/fdopen(),
allowing us to specify O_* flags as opposed to using fopen() OR open()/fdopen()
depending on whether we should block. 0666 are the base permissions used by
fopen() when files are created.
There were no tests for slapo-auditlog, so a small test suite that tests both
the basic behaviour, and blocking/non-blocking writes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9022
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED
Resolution|TEST |FIXED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.