SDF (Was: [Please Authorise] Permission to use your glossary as a starting point for OpenLDAP docs addition?)
At 03:04 AM 12/8/2006, Gavin Henry wrote:
Are we concerned with the sdf format in anyway?
About the format, no.
Is it still maintained?
Not actively.
Can we do everything we want with it?
No. But s/want/need/, then yes.
But I have absolutely no objections to sticking with sdf.
For now, sticking with SDF is best. But after we upgrade some more critical pieces of infrastructure, like the issue tracker and FAQ, we can come back to this.
Kurt
<quote who="Kurt D. Zeilenga">
At 03:04 AM 12/8/2006, Gavin Henry wrote:
Are we concerned with the sdf format in anyway?
About the format, no.
Is it still maintained?
Not actively.
Can we do everything we want with it?
No. But s/want/need/, then yes.
But I have absolutely no objections to sticking with sdf.
For now, sticking with SDF is best. But after we upgrade some more critical pieces of infrastructure, like the issue tracker and FAQ, we can come back to this.
Great, as I thought.
Gavin.
Kurt
-
Gavin Henry -
Kurt D. Zeilenga