hyc@OpenLDAP.org wrote:
Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/clients/tools
Modified Files: ldapmodify.c 1.190 -> 1.191
Log Message: Reject malformed LDIF - missing modops, or mismatched attributes
With this patch test021 fails while adding certificates to the directory, because the provided LDIF uses e.g.:
add: usercertificate usercertificate;binary:: xxxxxx
Should this really be allowed? There are other ops in the LDIF that actually provide the ";binary" tag in both places so it seems that's the expected behavior.
At 09:54 AM 11/27/2006, Howard Chu wrote:
hyc@OpenLDAP.org wrote:
Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/clients/tools Modified Files: ldapmodify.c 1.190 -> 1.191 Log Message: Reject malformed LDIF - missing modops, or mismatched attributes
With this patch test021 fails while adding certificates to the directory, because the provided LDIF uses e.g.:
add: usercertificate usercertificate;binary:: xxxxxx
Should this really be allowed?
No.
There are other ops in the LDIF that actually provide the ";binary" tag in both places so it seems that's the expected behavior.
-- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc OpenLDAP Core Team http://www.openldap.org/project/
-
Howard Chu -
Kurt D. Zeilenga