A few commits stacking up, so would like to review them for inclusion in an eventual 2.4.49.
I think all of the following look good for RE24, but wanted to confirm specifically on (a) the GnuTLS changes, (b) the cleaner error handling during connection setup, and (c) the Totp changes.
OpenLDAP: ITS#9067 fix syntax evaluation of preferredDeliveryMethod ITS#8753 Set minimum GnuTLS version to 3.2.2 ITS#9071 Document "tls none" for back-ldap ITS#9069 Do not call gnutls_global_set_mutex() ITS#9077 slapo-unique Let the loop finish ITS#9095 insert missing commit at end of slapindex processing ITS#9091 drop attr mappings added in an aborted txn ITS#9100 relax domainScope check for absent value ITS#9112 cleaner error handling during connection setup
Contrib: Totp: ITS#9055 Introduce a combined password scheme TotP: ITS#9055 Accept previous token
LMDB: ITS#9068 fix backslash escaping
Thanks, Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: http://www.symas.com
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 09:31:07AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
ITS#8753 Set minimum GnuTLS version to 3.2.2
Not on its own. Only needed if the rest of that ITS goes (guessing no).
ITS#9069 Do not call gnutls_global_set_mutex()
Subject to hyc's approval, but I think this could go in. It's been in Debian since 10.0 and Ubuntu since 19.04, no negative feedback.
Ryan Tandy wrote:
ITS#9069 Do not call gnutls_global_set_mutex()
Subject to hyc's approval, but I think this could go in. It's been in Debian since 10.0 and Ubuntu since 19.04, no negative feedback.
OK, sounds fine then.
--On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 8:12 PM +0000 Howard Chu hyc@symas.com wrote:
Ryan Tandy wrote:
ITS#9069 Do not call gnutls_global_set_mutex()
Subject to hyc's approval, but I think this could go in. It's been in Debian since 10.0 and Ubuntu since 19.04, no negative feedback.
OK, sounds fine then.
Are you OK with the rest of the changes (outside of ITS#8753) then?
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: http://www.symas.com
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Tuesday, November 5, 2019 8:12 PM +0000 Howard Chu hyc@symas.com wrote:
Ryan Tandy wrote:
ITS#9069 Do not call gnutls_global_set_mutex()
Subject to hyc's approval, but I think this could go in. It's been in Debian since 10.0 and Ubuntu since 19.04, no negative feedback.
OK, sounds fine then.
Are you OK with the rest of the changes (outside of ITS#8753) then?
Sure
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: http://www.symas.com
--On Thursday, November 21, 2019 1:32 PM +0000 Howard Chu hyc@symas.com wrote:
Are you OK with the rest of the changes (outside of ITS#8753) then?
So totp isn't part of contrib in RE24, so I'll skip those changes and it can go out with the RE25 alpha (Thinking January or so for that).
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: http://www.symas.com
Le 01/11/2019 à 17:31, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
A few commits stacking up, so would like to review them for inclusion in an eventual 2.4.49.
Hello,
I would like to know if there was some date planned for 2.4.49, and if this ITS could be added to this release: http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=9146;selectid=9146
Thanks a lot,
--On Friday, January 10, 2020 6:06 PM +0100 Clément OUDOT clement.oudot@worteks.com wrote:
Le 01/11/2019 à 17:31, Quanah Gibson-Mount a écrit :
A few commits stacking up, so would like to review them for inclusion in an eventual 2.4.49.
Hello,
I would like to know if there was some date planned for 2.4.49, and if this ITS could be added to this release: http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=9146;selectid=91 46
It was already merged into RE24 and added to the CHANGES file for 2.4.49.
There are a few open ITSes that need addressing before I can proceed with a testing call.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: http://www.symas.com
On 1/10/20 11:25 PM, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Friday, January 10, 2020 6:06 PM +0100 Clément OUDOT clement.oudot@worteks.com wrote:
I would like to know if there was some date planned for 2.4.49, and if this ITS could be added to this release: http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Software%20Bugs?id=9146;selectid=91 46
It was already merged into RE24 and added to the CHANGES file for 2.4.49.
There are a few open ITSes that need addressing before I can proceed with a testing call.
The fix for ITS#9124 is pretty urgent. So other ITS should not block releasing 2.4.49.
Ciao, Michael.
--On Saturday, January 11, 2020 10:42 AM +0100 Michael Ströder michael@stroeder.com wrote:
There are a few open ITSes that need addressing before I can proceed with a testing call.
The fix for ITS#9124 is pretty urgent. So other ITS should not block releasing 2.4.49.
Now that ITS#9150 is addressed, which was also rather serious as far as data integrity is concerned, we should be set for a testing call on Monday. I still have a side issue that has no ITS yet that may also go into this release, but we should be set for the testing call.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: http://www.symas.com
-
Clément OUDOT -
Howard Chu -
Michael Ströder -
Quanah Gibson-Mount -
Ryan Tandy