On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
> On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:44 AM, Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:
>> Kurt Zeilenga writes:
>>> I'm not sure why his merge was needed. Likely I goofed. I think it
>>> was a no-op.
>> Ah. Well, we'll have more glitches I'm sure.
>> 'gitk --all' or 'git log --graph' shows you did 'Update
>> Copyright/License handling' in one branch and 'Update configure' +
>> Update for git' in another. I.e. didn't pull the first before
>> committing/pushing the second.
> Shouldn't that have been rejected by the hooks:
> denyNonFastForwards = true
> denyDeletes = true
> If something requires a merge, wouldn't that be a non-fast-forward push?
Actually, instead of per repo settings, these might need to be system settings.
nevermind. They ought to be per repo otherwise we won't be able to delete from
Let me install those.