I found a few stray items that still need matching rules. All were trivially straight forward except one for slapo-chain:
{ "chain-chaining", "args", 2, 4, 0, ARG_MAGIC|ARG_BERVAL|CH_CHAINING, chain_cf_gen, "( OLcfgOvAt:3.1 NAME 'olcChainingBehavior' " "DESC 'Chaining behavior control parameters (draft-sermersheim-ldap-chaining)' " "SYNTAX OMsDirectoryString SINGLE-VALUE )", NULL, NULL },
At the moment, based on the man page description, I was thinking:
"EQUALITY caseExactMatch "
for the matching rule. Anyone have an opinion for caseIgnoreMatch being better?
Thanks, Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: http://www.symas.com
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
I found a few stray items that still need matching rules. All were trivially straight forward except one for slapo-chain:
{ "chain-chaining", "args", 2, 4, 0, ARG_MAGIC|ARG_BERVAL|CH_CHAINING, chain_cf_gen, "( OLcfgOvAt:3.1 NAME 'olcChainingBehavior' " "DESC 'Chaining behavior control parameters (draft-sermersheim-ldap-chaining)' " "SYNTAX OMsDirectoryString SINGLE-VALUE )", NULL, NULL },
At the moment, based on the man page description, I was thinking:
"EQUALITY caseExactMatch "
for the matching rule. Anyone have an opinion for caseIgnoreMatch being better?
Looks like the values are schema keywords, they should be caseIgnoreMatch.
Thanks, Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: http://www.symas.com
--On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 7:28 PM +0100 Howard Chu hyc@symas.com wrote:
for the matching rule. Anyone have an opinion for caseIgnoreMatch being better?
Looks like the values are schema keywords, they should be caseIgnoreMatch.
Great, thanks!
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Product Architect Symas Corporation Packaged, certified, and supported LDAP solutions powered by OpenLDAP: http://www.symas.com