ITS#6337 seems to indicate that it's time to move bind response inside the backends. Unfortunately right now the need to send bind response from outside the backends is well-bundled into slapd, so the whole thing might not be trivial.
p.
masarati@aero.polimi.it writes:
ITS#6337 seems to indicate that it's time to move bind response inside the backends. Unfortunately right now the need to send bind response from outside the backends is well-bundled into slapd, so the whole thing might not be trivial.
Yes. Also Extended Response. That would get rid of some of the abuses of o_abandon to mean "suppress response" in backends/overlays that send these responses when they shouldn't - ITS#6138.
Hallvard B Furuseth writes:
masarati@aero.polimi.it writes:
ITS#6337 seems to indicate that it's time to move bind response inside the backends. Unfortunately right now the need to send bind response from outside the backends is well-bundled into slapd, so the whole thing might not be trivial.
Yes.
I should have said - yes, for RE25 I hope. As you note, it's a major change. I don't think it belongs in RE24.
Also Extended Response. That would get rid of some of the abuses of o_abandon to mean "suppress response" in backends/overlays that send these responses when they shouldn't - ITS#6138.
-
Hallvard B Furuseth -
masaratiļ¼ aero.polimi.it