Re: postalAddress matching rule

--On Tuesday, August 26, 2008 7:13 PM +0200 Michael Ströder michael@stroeder.com wrote:

Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:

...

Does the RFC proclaim a matching rule for postalAddress? Because if it doesn't, there's no point in defining one. ;) If an attr doesn't have a matching rule, you have to use a replace op rather than delete.

Yes. And OpenLDAP even announces it in the subschema without implementing it (see also ITS#5608). :-(

Ah, well, then I certainly encourage Brett to implement it. ;)

--Quanah

--

Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration