On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 at 06:48, Ryan Tandy wrote:
Why was this particular approach chosen? As opposed to, for example, doing feature releases more often (e.g. 2.6 as soon as a few months after 2.5), or adding a fourth version component (2.5.y.z) for strictly bugfix-only patch releases? Not trying to advocate a change of decision, just interested in the thought process...
For what it's worth, I'm also interested in the thought process behind the decision.
As an observer of this project, the length of time between releases in this project makes it seem far less active than other projects.
So, I personally would like to see more frequent releases, with a clearer timeline and goals for each release.
Of course, developer time, motivation and other factors come into play, so it's not cut and dry.
Just my two cents.
Hugh