Re: Dereference Control

Hi,

Le Mer 22 octobre 2008 16:36, Pierangelo Masarati a écrit :

• 2.1 Example
• 2.1.1 Request
• { { member, { GUID, SID } }, { memberOf, { GUID, SID } } }
• 2.1.2 Response
• { { memberOf, "cn=abartlet,cn=users,dc=abartlet,dc=net",

• { GUID, [ "0bc11d00-e431-40a0-8767-344a320142fa" ],
  

•   SID, [ "S-1-2-3-2345" ] } },
  

• { memberOf, "cn=ando,cn=users,dc=sys-net,dc=it",

• { GUID, [ "0bc11d00-e431-40a0-8767-344a320142fb" ],
  

•   SID, [ "S-1-2-3-2346" ] } } }
  

• 2.2 Example
• 2.2.1 Request
• { { member, { cn, uid, drink } } }
• 2.2.2 Response
• { { member, "cn=ando,cn=users,dc=sys-net,dc=it",

• { cn, [ "ando", "Pierangelo Masarati" ],
  

•   uid, [ "ando" ] } } }
  

Sorry if I'm completly misunderstanding, but would not it be more simple and user friendly if the attributes were directly returned to the user, like do many overlays ? Ideally this could be : member/cn: ando member/cn: Pierangelo Masarati member/uid: ando

But to be more LDAP-friendly, we could see something like: cn;member: ando cn;member: Pierangelo Masarati uid;member: ando

Or maybe I'm totally missing a point :)

Regards, Raphael Ouazana.