Re: Any plans for 2.4.9?

Howard Chu writes:

Hallvard B Furuseth wrote:

...

Do anyone have opinions about my questions in ITS#5408, back-ldif bugs? (...)

Fair enough. Do it now.

Well, this weekend I guess. But I need advice about Windows filenames, at least. No point in renaming files from one broken naming scheme to another broken one. And whether to use a common naming scheme for Unix and Windows, or OS-specific schemes.

I need advice or "yes/no" about the other functionality issues listed too, but they can wait till someone has time to look at them. Except referrals, that code is too broken to keep:-)