--On May 14, 2009 3:14:46 PM -0700 Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@zimbra.com wrote:
--On May 14, 2009 3:05:25 PM -0700 Howard Chu hyc@symas.com wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On May 14, 2009 2:22:46 PM -0700 Howard Chuhyc@symas.com wrote:
Secondly it seems so that Cyrus SASL code does not support SSF larger than 56 for GSSAPI based signing/encryption (aka integrity/confidential
Also wrong, Cyrus SASL/GSSAPI is known to work with up to ssf=112.
In any case, the way cyrus-sasl current works, the reported SSF value is pretty irrelevant, since it is hard coded. If you (Mike) are particularly interested in improving the SASL/GSSAPI interactions in OpenLDAP, I'd advise you work on re-working the Cyrus SASL GSSAPI plugin to do things like get the SSF from the underlying kerberos libraries, and back when it's negotiated, so OpenLDAP can report the accurate values. The folks on the Cyrus-sasl project are actively developing again, so now is the time to start contributing to that project.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration