On 14/08/2009 17:44, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
--On Thursday, August 13, 2009 12:01 PM +0100 Gavin Henry ghenry@suretecsystems.com wrote:
----- "Michael Ströder" michael@stroeder.com wrote:
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
In looking at our FAQ, many entries detail ancient (2.1 and
earlier)
information that is completely obsolete. It would be nice to be
able to
archive off the cruft so that the site is actually of more use. Thoughts on how best to achieve this?
Do we really need this ancient stuff to be archived? Many snippets are not of such a good quality which would justify the effort needed to maintain an archive.
Ciao, Michael.
It's not supported by the project I think, so should be just deleted.
Anyone else have an opinion?
Actually, I find this information useful once in a while, when having to debug ancient installations. There are still many out there, unfortunately... (and of course, I'm too "new" to know how things used to work before 2.2)
Maybe a category could be created, named "Historical", and all the old entries placed within?
Regards, Jonathan