Howard Chu wrote:
Michael Ströder wrote:
Howard Chu wrote:
masarati@aero.polimi.it wrote:
hyc@OpenLDAP.org wrote: Detecting renames will be trickier since the cache typically won't have any entryUUIDs. I think we'll simply have to treat it as a Delete / Add...
... which makes sense for a cache, all in all.
Or, as implementing this feature seems to move towards on-demand sync replication, we could always include entryUUID and entryCSN in the requested attributes, e.g. by implicitly adding them to the attrsets.
Yes, but that's only viable if the target server supports entryUUID and entryCSN. There are plenty of pcache use cases where this will not be true.
Other LDAP servers have similar attributes.
entryUUID: GUID on eDirectory, objectGUID on MS AD and ADAM.
Similar for entryCSN. (Can look up these if needed.)
How about making this configurable?
pcache has been working fine without explicit support of these so far, and they're not critical to the current work.
I agree it's not critical.
I'm not opposed to someone adding these later, but I don't have time for them right now.
It was just a suggestion.
Ciao, Michael.