LDAP Transactions RFC alignment
by Daniel Otero
Hi,
I'm interested in implementing LDAP Transactions as specified in RFC 5805. I've checked there is something implemented in the client side, slapd and back-bdb dated in 2006, as the RFC is of March 2010 I would like to know how aligned is the current implementation in branch 2.4 with regards the RFC 5805.
I also use the back-meta to proxy to remote LDAP servers, AFAIK currently there is no support for LDAP transactions in back-meta. Is there any plan to extend the back-meta with support for LDAP transactions?
Regards
/Dani
12 years, 8 months
- 3
- 2
Contradictory comments in slap_cleanup_play()
by Hallvard B Furuseth
Since result.c rev 1.287 (ando), slap_cleanup_play() has said:
/* a new callback has been inserted
* after the existing one; repair the list */
/* a new callback has been inserted
* in place of the existing one; repair the list */
1.287 introduced 2nd comment. I assume 1st should be removed, rather
than joining them to "...after or in place of the existing one"?
--
Hallvard
12 years, 8 months
- 1
- 0