openldap-devel July 2007

openldap-devel@openldap.org

13 participants
26 discussions

Re: Releasedate OpenLDAP 2.4
by Gavin Henry 17 Jul '07

17 Jul '07

<quote who="Dagobert Michelsen"> > Hi Gavin, > > Am 17.07.2007 um 11:04 schrieb Gavin Henry: >> <quote who="Dagobert Michelsen"> >>> is there a release date for OpenLDAP 2.4? I had a talk with >>> my boss today and he asked if the new Perl backend I am working >>> on is going to make it into the next release. >> >> There will be a beta versin of 2.4 (progressing from alpha) soon. >> No dates >> yet. >> >> As for your new Perl backend, we haven't seen much of it yet, so it >> won't >> have been tested and is unlikely to be added just now. > > The question is if there is a chance of changing the backend to > OpenLDAP 2.4 after release if it is not going to make it in the > initial release. The next version 3.0 (or 2.5) is probably years > away. I couldn't comment as I'm not part of the core team, only the Engineering team. Have anyone seen your code in the project yet? Thanks, Gavin. > > > Best regards > > -- Dagobert > > -- > Dagobert Michelsen (Leiter IT) Baltic Online Computer GmbH > Firmensitz: Alter Markt 1-2, 24103 Kiel, Telefon: +49 431 54003-0 > Geschäftsführer: Erik Cickovskis, Amtsgericht Kiel, HRB 3756 > "Of course computer servers don't need thrust, since they generally > don't go anywhere." -- Comment in TR on new HP server turbine fans > > > >

1 0

Releasedate OpenLDAP 2.4
by Dagobert Michelsen 17 Jul '07

17 Jul '07

Hi, is there a release date for OpenLDAP 2.4? I had a talk with my boss today and he asked if the new Perl backend I am working on is going to make it into the next release. Best regards -- Dagobert

2 1

Issue [4623] : backport patch
by Benoit Donnette 16 Jul '07

16 Jul '07

Hello, I wanted to submit a shortish patch, basically backported from the 2.4 solution for issue 4623 to the 2.3 branch, tested on Linux and Solaris 9. I am not sure about the proper way to submit such a patch, any comment is therefore welcome. Technically, it is just a backport of 2.4's fix for 4623. It has been tested on both Linux and Solaris 9. Yours contributingly, B. Donnette - LINAGORA - OSSA team www.linagora.com - www.08000linux.com

4 6

authPassword (RFC 3112) implemented?
by Gavin Henry 15 Jul '07

15 Jul '07

Dear all, I was reading doc/devel/todo and RFC3112, and did a grep ;-) I see that the following files contain authPassword info: schema_init.c schema_prep.c slap.h Does this mean it's implemented, as it still says it's not in slappasswd(8) Thanks. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/

5 7

Is slapover.txt up to date for 2.4?
by Gavin Henry 14 Jul '07

14 Jul '07

Dear all, Just reviewing our docs again and want to make sure slapover.txt is up to date for all the latest overlay internals/details in 2.4. Would someone be so kind as to check and if you want, fire over any changes and I can apply them. Thanks, Gavin. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm). http://www.suretecsystems.com/

1 0

Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/overlays rwm.c rwm.h rwmconf.c rwmdn.c rwmmap.c
by Pierangelo Masarati 14 Jul '07

14 Jul '07

ando(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: > Log Message: > major improvement: baseline support for back-config; minor improvement: trim code to handle absence of librewrite (enable forced when slapo-rwm is configured...) The major defect of this implementation is that there is no "rwm-map" or "rwm-rewrite*" unparse. So the input is saved "as is"; it is presented "as is" via the back-config interface, and it needs to be entirely replaced instead of fine-grain edited by inserting/deleting/resorting statements. I'll leave this as a future development if needed. I plan to work at back-relay and back-meta some time, but probably not in the very short term, so please don't wait for it for a future 2.4 release. p. Ing. Pierangelo Masarati OpenLDAP Core Team SysNet s.r.l. via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA http://www.sys-net.it --------------------------------------- Office: +39 02 23998309 Mobile: +39 333 4963172 Email: pierangelo.masarati(a)sys-net.it ---------------------------------------

1 0

Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd backend.c
by Howard Chu 12 Jul '07

12 Jul '07

hyc(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: > Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/servers/slapd > > Modified Files: > backend.c 1.378 -> 1.379 > > Log Message: > ITS#4986 - remove special manageDSAit handing in select_backend() Of course this makes the manageDSAit parameter to select_backend() totally unnecessary. I guess I'll remove that soon as well. -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

ldap_dn2ad_canonical() and UTF8
by Ralf Haferkamp 11 Jul '07

11 Jul '07

Hi, The ldap_dn2ad_canonical() function is supposed to map an LDAP DN into a Active Directory Canonical Name. Does anybody know why this function disallows DNs with UTF8 characters in them? The comments in the code are somewhat uncertain regarding this ;) /* * b) does DCE/AD support UTF-8? * no clue; don't think so. */ But testing with a Windows Server showed me that is seems to be possible to have UTF characters in the Canonical name. I am asking because I'd like to commit a change that allows to have UTF8 in canonical names (by removing the check for LDAP_AVA_NONPRINTABLE from the strval2ADstr* functions. -- regards, Ralf

2 1

Re: commit: ldap/servers/slapd/back-bdb filterindex.c
by Howard Chu 09 Jul '07

09 Jul '07

quanah(a)OpenLDAP.org wrote: > Update of /repo/OpenLDAP/pkg/ldap/servers/slapd/back-bdb > > Modified Files: > filterindex.c 1.68 -> 1.69 > > Log Message: > ITS#5037 > Move db == NULL check to correct spot As we already discussed in IM, just re-ordering the tests is not sufficient. The actual test for db == NULL is wrong, you have to test the rc for the specific value (LDAP_INAPPROPRIATE_MATCHING). There are two problems - if bdb_index_param fails for any reason at all, it will not set the db, so you need to distinguish the serious failures from the benign ones. Also, if you examine the code for bdb_index_param, you'll see that it never touches the db parameter on failure, so it will remain uninitialized. -- -- Howard Chu Chief Architect, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#4991) pcache and rwm don't play well together
by Ralf Haferkamp 09 Jul '07

09 Jul '07

Hello, slightly related to the above ITS, I have found another issue. I am not sure though if this is a bug or if the behaviour is intended. I have a setup here were the pcache and rwm-overlay is used on top of back-ldap. rwm is used to rewrite some Attributetypes unknown to the Schema of the local server to Attributetypes that are defined in the local server. As the attribute values from unknown attribute types cannot be normalized by the proxy, I am wondering if rwm should normalize them during the Mapping process? Otherwise the Values will endup un-normalized in the cache database, and I get incomplete results when requests are answered from the cache. I have a patch ready for this but I was wondering if the normalization step is left out by intention and wanted to ask before commiting my patch. -- Ralf

3 7

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-devel July 2007