On Montag, 26. Mai 2008, ando@sys-net.it wrote:

rhafer@suse.de wrote:

...

...

...

Splitting the above modification in two separate operations works around that problem.

What about using replace instead?

That causes the same behavior as the modification pasted above. So it doesn't work as well.

Also, it might not be very practical if very complex indexing is in place...

Yes. But I think I fixed the original issue now. (r1.39 of servers/slapd/back-bdb/attr.c)