https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9870
Issue ID: 9870
Summary: Remove optional overlay syntax
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
While the module/overlay support was really young, an unreleased version of
OpenLDAP supported 'optional overlays' that could fail start up without that
being treated as a fatal error.
This was later disabled, never documented and nowadays it can't work anyway,
but the configuration option is still there in config_overlay() honouring
overlay names starting with the '-' character as an alias. A patch to remove
that leftover is coming.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9869
Issue ID: 9869
Summary: LDAP over TLS not doing hostname verification in
version 2.4.59
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.59
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: radiatejava(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
My software was using openldap client 2.4.44 to talk to the LDAP server. We
have shifted to 2.4.59 now to address some issues. Ever since we shifted, the
new version is allowing LDAP over TLS without hostname verification.
In the older 2.4.44, I always got this error if hostname did not match the CN
value:
return code -1 - Can't contact LDAP server) diagnostic message TLS: hostname
does not match CN in peer certificate
But after the lib update, no such error even if I am using LDAP server IP to do
LDAP bind while LDAP server certificate has CN set as some FQDN (say
test.ldap.com). Our client side code has not changed while we updated the ldap
lib. For our client, we are only doing these settings:
ldap_set_option(ld, LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_CACERTDIR, lCertsDir)
ldap_set_option(NULL, LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_CACERTFILE, lCert)
Has there been any change in this regard? How do I enforce hostname
verification now?
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8227
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #6 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Yeah, just gone all the way to backlogging one consumer till we block in
slapd_wait_writer() and the other one keeps receiving all messages as they are
prepared, just as one would hope. Resuming the blocked consumer seems to flush
everything down that connection as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8227
--- Comment #5 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> ---
Possibly this ticket is obsolete then. If you're satisfied that
suspending/blocking one consumer doesn't interfere with other
consumers' progress, we can just close this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8227
--- Comment #4 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Maybe you meant something else because I'm not seeing this,
syncprov_matchops->syncprov_qresp already schedules a separate syncprov_qtask
for each active persist session that has anything to send out. Those sessions
each have a separate response queue, sharing a reference to the resinfo
provided.
And those tasks then run independent of each other sending messages (since
ITS#5985 just one message at a time), reclaiming syncres and since ITS#8039
possibly resinfo as they make progress. Also verified all of this at runtime.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6942
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|--- |High
--- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> ---
Fairly critical for 2.7.0 so that we can better handle replicated environments
with chaining where MMR is in play.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9861
Issue ID: 9861
Summary: Read-only databases can't be opened - regression
introduced with da0527ac
Product: LMDB
Version: unspecified
Hardware: aarch64
OS: Mac OS
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: liblmdb
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: jocke(a)ordo.one
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 905
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=905&action=edit
Reduced simple test to open the environment that fails
The ability to open an environment in read-only mode when the file permissions
is 'read only' for the user is no longer possible after the commit
da0527ac75b811419b7007202799f96b2edb5aef.
It is simply reproduced by creating a database with e.g. mtest.c, then changing
the permissions to read-only, then running another trivial program trying to
open the environment in read-only mode / no-lock mode fails.
Specifically, after some investigation it seems that the check on line 5516 "if
(!(flags & (MDB_RDONLY|MDB_WRITEMAP))) {" was removed in the above commit such
that mdb_fopen() is called (presumably incorrectly?).
Returning that guard check seems to restore functionality, but I'm not familiar
enough with the code base to say that is a valid fix - but seems likely.
I applied that single change here:
https://github.com/hassila/swift-lmdb/tree/hassila-mdb-merge-patch
with this commit:
https://github.com/hassila/swift-lmdb/commit/c940b4c807c278cea43d2e3858dc22…
To reproduce with a clean checkout:
1. make
2. mkdir tested
3. ./mtest
4. chmod -wx testdb/data.mdb
5. run the attached program (reduced from real code base)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9859
Issue ID: 9859
Summary: fix test
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.12
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 904
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=904&action=edit
openldap-2.5-fix_test.patch
1. specifiy modulepath and moduleload
moduleload ../rel/mod.la works on build directry ex: make test
but it doesn't work with installed slapd.
It should be specified the modulepath and moduleload separately like other
tests.
```
modulepath ../servers/slapd/overlays/
moduleload mod.la
```
2. skip test020-proxycache for back-wt
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9799
Issue ID: 9799
Summary: Clearing pending ops on Bind
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
When slapd receives some operations before it has started processing a queued
bind, those get added into conn->c_ops_pending and c_n_pending_ops is updated
accordingly.
Bind then eventually invokes connection_abandon() which forgets to zero out
c_n_pending_ops and the connection remains unusable forever.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6461
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|2.5.0 |2.5.12
Group|OpenLDAP-devs |
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.