openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20891 discussions

[Issue 9917] New: Remove -h and -p from options[] in client tools
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9917 Issue ID: 9917 Summary: Remove -h and -p from options[] in client tools Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: daniels.thomas(a)pm.me Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 914 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=914&action=edit patch for this issue The options -h and -p got removed from client tools (https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8618). However, they were still present in the options[] array in several client tools source files. So, if one of those tools got executed with -h or -p followed by a value, this lead to the error "unrecognized option -", without mentioning which option was problematic. Removing 'h' and 'p' from options[] fixes this. This patch does that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9908] New: LDAP* leak in slapd-tester children when retrying a bind
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9908 Issue ID: 9908 Summary: LDAP* leak in slapd-tester children when retrying a bind Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Happens in lloadd's test002 where the balancer routinely returns BUSY in response to a bind. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9860] New: ldapsearch memory leaks
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9860 Issue ID: 9860 Summary: ldapsearch memory leaks Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp Target Milestone: --- When using page control, The control value leaks with each goto getNextPage; loop due to `i` and `nctrl` step back. ``` 1114 getNextPage: ... 1124 save_nctrls = nctrls; 1125 i = nctrls; ``` ``` 1284 if ( ldap_create_page_control_value( ld, 1285 pageSize, &pr_cookie, &c[i].ldctl_value ) ) ``` ``` 1445 /* step back to the original number of controls, so that 1446 * those set while parsing args are preserved */ 1447 nctrls = save_nctrls; ``` ``` 1612 goto getNextPage; ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9926] New: Bad file links in openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5.tar.gz
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9926 Issue ID: 9926 Summary: Bad file links in openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5.tar.gz Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ksmith(a)blackducksoftware.com Target Milestone: --- The current archive openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5.tar.gz (downloaded 10/4/22) contains files that were included as invalid links. This causes errors when trying to unzip via 7zip or trying to scan with various software tools. The tar.gz is successfully expanded using "tar -xvzf" but the problem files do not exist. Error output in 7zip is: Can not create symbolic link: A required priviledge in not held by the client.: openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5\servers\lloadd\design.md openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5\servers\lloadd\nt_svc.c openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5\tests\data\homedir\skel\directory\broken link openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5\tests\data\homedir\skel\svmlink Bad file links in openldap-OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_5.tar.gz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 9900] New: configure.ac contains non-portable statement (bashism)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9900 Issue ID: 9900 Summary: configure.ac contains non-portable statement (bashism) Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael.osipov(a)siemens.com Target Milestone: --- My shell on HP-UX tells me: ./configure[22349]: ==: A test command parameter is not valid. which is causes by > 2038 if test $ol_enable_slapd == no && test $ol_enable_balancer != yes ; then in configure.ac. Similar I have reported to BIND9: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/bind9/-/issues/2873. POSIX expects one equals sign. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9894] New: NetBSD build needs gmake, the default make utility does not have all the necessary features.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9894 Issue ID: 9894 Summary: NetBSD build needs gmake, the default make utility does not have all the necessary features. Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Other Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: lucio.dere(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Please include in your build instructions that NetBSD's "make" (bmake, I seem to recall) rejects some Makefile stuff (for the bare "make" command, "make depend" completed successfully). Perhaps configure can figure that out or just check for gmake and use it if found? I did not try "make test". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9942] New: back-mdb fails to release Added entries
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9942 Issue ID: 9942 Summary: back-mdb fails to release Added entries Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Detected by valgrind on test002. Appears to be a regression since some time after ITS#7915. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9895] New: Increase max number of index DBs in back-mdb
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Feb '23

09 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9895 Issue ID: 9895 Summary: Increase max number of index DBs in back-mdb Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Currently there is a hardcoded limit of 128 index DBs in back-mdb. Some sites want more than this (although there's no evidence they actually use more than 128 attributes in all of their applications' search filters). For 2.5/2.6 we can simply double the constant. For 2.7 consider making it configurable. Note that increasing the number increases the size of an LMDB transaction structure, and also increases the time needed to initialize it whenever creating a transaction, so it's a bad idea to just set this to an arbitrarily large number. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 10006] New: gitlab account awaiting approval
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 Feb '23

06 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10006 Issue ID: 10006 Summary: gitlab account awaiting approval Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: facboy(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- i've tried creating an account on https://git.openldap.org a few weeks ago, but it is still awaiting approval. it has the same email as this bugzilla account. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10005] New: Fix flags not getting committed when using named dbs in lmdb
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 06 Feb '23

06 Feb '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10005 Issue ID: 10005 Summary: Fix flags not getting committed when using named dbs in lmdb Product: LMDB Version: 0.9.29 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: mega.alpha100(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- This addition is simply a replication of some logic already in lmdb's repo to ensure flags are saved when using named db, like is already done for the main/unamed db This is a link to the requested fix https://github.com/Ultra-Code/lmdb/commit/ce001a311d8fb16afbf13df2a1e21d505… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs