openldap-bugs August 2012

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

29 participants
100 discussions

Re: (ITS#7375) slapo-dynlist is very slow
by hyc＠symas.com 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

rouazana(a)linagora.com wrote: > Note that using "sortvals uniqueMember" configuration allows dynlist to > work in a correct time (about 3s for a base search on the group). > > So I don't know I you want this issue to be fixed or not. Closing this ITS. > > Regards, > Raphaël Ouazana. > > > -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#7375) slapo-dynlist is very slow
by rouazana＠linagora.com 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

Note that using "sortvals uniqueMember" configuration allows dynlist to work in a correct time (about 3s for a base search on the group). So I don't know I you want this issue to be fixed or not. Regards, Raphaël Ouazana.

1 0

(ITS#7249) slapd segfault with memberof overlay on frontend db
by c.phan＠active-system.com 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

Full_Name: Chinh Phan Version: 2.4.32 OS: Fedora 16 URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (84.96.74.38) Hello, I'm still having a segfault error even with the fix suggested by Howard Chu (http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/201204/msg00171.html): slapd[2812]: segfault at 7f8d0b7fffd8 ip 00000000004377b0 sp 00007f8d0b7fffe0 error 6 in slapd[400000+1c6000] Does anyone know if this issue has been addressed or is planned to be fixed in the next release? Appreciate your feedback. chinh

1 0

(ITS#7375) slapo-dynlist is very slow
by raphael.ouazana＠linagora.com 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

Full_Name: Raphael Ouazana Version: 2.4.31 OS: Linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/ Submission from: (NULL) (88.173.78.196) Hi, I'm using dynlist to generate a dynamic group with ~50k users. The LDAP request written in the memberURL attribute takes about 8 seconds to execute. But a base search request on the group takes more than 2 minutes to execute. So I think dynlist should be optimized. Regards, Raphaël Ouazana.

1 0

(ITS#7374) [PATCH] MozNSS: better file name matching for hashed CA certificate directory
by jvcelak＠redhat.com 29 Aug '12

29 Aug '12

Full_Name: Jan Vcelak Version: git master OS: Linux URL: ftp://ftp.openldap.org/incoming/jvcelak-20120829-moznss-beter-file-name-mat… Submission from: (NULL) (209.132.186.34) This change concerns Mozilla NSS crypto backend: CA certificate files in OpenSSL compatible CACERTDIR were loaded if the file extension was '.0'. However the file name should be 8 letters long certificate hash of the certificate subject name, followed by a numeric suffix which is used to differentiate between two certificates with the same subject name. With this patch, certificate file names are matched correctly (using regular expressions). The attached file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were developed by Red Hat. Red Hat has not assigned rights and/or interest in this work to any party. I, Jan Vcelak am authorized by Red Hat, my employer, to release this work under the following terms. Red Hat hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software (and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or other notice.

1 0

Re: (ITS#7363) libmdb should use POSIX semaphores on non-apple BSD systems too.
by cmikk＠qwest.net 29 Aug '12

29 Aug '12

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 08:07:31AM +0200, Hallvard Breien Furuseth wrote: > We can #ifndef PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED instead of BSD, unless someone > #define it without supporting it. Not for MDB_FDATASYNC though. The *BSD systems define PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED but do not implement sharable pthread mutexes. The flag name is part of the API, but implementation of the behavior it requests is optional. -- Chris Mikkelson | Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur cmikk(a)qwest.net |

1 0

Re: (ITS#7363) libmdb should use POSIX semaphores on non-apple BSD systems too.
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 28 Aug '12

28 Aug '12

Howard Chu writes: > PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED is defined just about everywhere, that's not a useful > test. (You only discover at runtime that the mutex creation/init failed...) Argh. Oh well, we should only do the namespace cleanup, then. __BSD__ symbols etc. BTW, I think the lock file should contain a field indicating the sync primitive type, so different compilations of MDB won't use different sync primitives. Which maybe also means we might as well pick the primitive at runtime (try PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED first, then sem_open). -- Hallvard

1 0

Re: (ITS#7363) libmdb should use POSIX semaphores on non-apple BSD systems too.
by hyc＠symas.com 28 Aug '12

28 Aug '12

h.b.furuseth(a)usit.uio.no wrote: > We can #ifndef PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED instead of BSD, unless someone > #define it without supporting it. Not for MDB_FDATASYNC though. > PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED is defined just about everywhere, that's not a useful test. (You only discover at runtime that the mutex creation/init failed...) -- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/

1 0

Re: (ITS#7363) libmdb should use POSIX semaphores on non-apple BSD systems too.
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 28 Aug '12

28 Aug '12

Please try this patch, I can't. It's split up for readability. Replace defined(BSD) in 1st patch with defined(__BSD__) or whatever, see below. http://folk.uio.no/hbf/its7363-cleanup.txt Also, maybe we can drop __APPLE__ - it may #define __BSD__ too. ANDROID should be something like __ANDROID__. I can't test either. Explanation: defined(BSD) breaks in strict ISO C mode. Is there a symbol like __BSD__ or __BSD to use instead? Namespace-wise, "MDB_USE_POSIX_SEM" would be better. MDB_FDATASYNC should not depend on USE_POSIX_SEM. We can #ifndef PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED instead of BSD, unless someone #define it without supporting it. Not for MDB_FDATASYNC though. -- Hallvard

1 0

Re: (ITS#7364) mdb: clean up POSIX semaphores on environment close.
by h.b.furuseth＠usit.uio.no 28 Aug '12

28 Aug '12

Howard Chu writes: > h.b.furuseth(a)usit.uio.no wrote: >> That won't help if the mdb proccess crashes. > > If which process crashes? Sorry, I meant the process which would have removed the semaphore. -- Hallvard

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs August 2012