--On Thursday, March 19, 2009 11:12 AM -0700 Howard Chu hyc@symas.com wrote:
Aaron Richton wrote:
Is something improperly ordered during teardowns?
[6] ldap_pvt_thread_pool_destroy(tpool = 0x39c374, run_pending = 1), line 570 in "tpool.c"
https://www.nbcs.rutgers.edu/~richton/slapd.log.20090319.bz2
Same issue we ran into earlier, the consumer info has been freed but there's still a consumer task queued in the thread pool. I had already changed things around to avoid this but obviously haven't totally prevented it. Should be fixed now in HEAD.
This is now in RE24 as well. Updated testing results welcomed.
--Quanah
--
Quanah Gibson-Mount Principal Software Engineer Zimbra, Inc -------------------- Zimbra :: the leader in open source messaging and collaboration