-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 09/28/11 18:26, Kurt Zeilenga wrote:
Given the project doesn't specifically attempt to support
1.x, your request as summarized in the subject line is a bit odd.
I suggest this be considered more of a request to enable future
support of the FreeBSD 10.x.
Do the current release of libtool and autotools includes the
enabling features needed?
If so, then this can simply be treated as a request to update these
tools (which are generally incorporated without any functional
If not, well, then we should just wait for thsoe enabling changes
to be released by the upstream tool provider first
I think we will have to wait for upstream release then, the changes
are already in their source tree.
I'll patch OpenLDAP in the FreeBSD ports to make it work at this moment.
On Sep 28, 2011, at 2:38 PM, delphij(a)FreeBSD.org wrote:
> Full_Name: Xin Li Version: git trunk OS: FreeBSD/amd64 10.1 URL:
Submission from: (NULL)
> Code duplicated from GNU libtool and autotools uses 'freebsd1*'
> rather than 'freebsd1.*' to test if the system is FreeBSD 1.x.
> This logic would match FreeBSD 10.0, causing problem when
> building shared libraries.
> I'd like to propose that FreeBSD 1.x support be dropped since
> it's obsolete in 1994 (17 years ago).
> The patch is just for reference, it also drops FreeBSD 2.x and
> FreeBSD 3.x support but it's not complete.
> A libtool patched with git revision
> e94c6d6e0359d92f08f491f57e0ef3371e978952 would also be required
> to build OpenLDAP properly.
Xin LI <delphij(a)delphij.net> https://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----