https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org&gt; --- HEAD: • 18786c4c by David Coutadeur at 2022-03-22T19:15:37+01:00 upgrade ppm to 2.1 release (references #ITS9814) Reject password if it contains tokens from an attribute of the LDAP entry https://github.com/ltb-project/ppm/issues/17 • e9da6241 by David Coutadeur at 2022-03-25T11:05:56+01:00 ppm: fix typo + logs example in documentation (references #ITS9814) RE26: • 85f38f8a by David Coutadeur at 2022-03-25T17:01:54+00:00 ITS#9814 - upgrade ppm to 2.1 release Reject password if it contains tokens from an attribute of the LDAP entry https://github.com/ltb-project/ppm/issues/17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 --- Comment #4 from David Coutadeur <david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Ok, thank you for your answer. Actually, I didn't think that the contrib overlays (and especially ppm, which is an overlay extension), were also frozen in the LTS. Can you clarify this point (if there is a defined policy)? In the present case, there is only a new config parameter, so backward compatibility should be ensured, maybe can it be included in 2.5? Regards, David -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|--- |2.6.2 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Keywords|needs_review | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814 --- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org&gt; --- The merge request should be made against the development branch (master) not the release branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.