https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814
Issue ID: 9814 Summary: upgrade ppm to 2.1 release Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs@openldap.org Reporter: david.coutadeur@gmail.com Target Milestone: ---
Hello,
I have just opened two new MR to upgrade ppm to 2.1 release: * for OpenLDAP 2.5: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/509
* for OpenLDAP 2.6: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/510
Changes: - Reject password if it contains tokens from an attribute of the LDAP entry https://github.com/ltb-project/ppm/issues/17
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814
--- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@openldap.org --- The merge request should be made against the development branch (master) not the release branches.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814
--- Comment #2 from David Coutadeur david.coutadeur@gmail.com --- Ok, sorry for the mistake.
Here is the new MR on master branch: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/511
As 2.5 and 2.6 code of ppm have diverged on OpenLDAP main repository, you will have to resolve some conflicts.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814
Howard Chu hyc@openldap.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Target Milestone|--- |2.6.2 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Keywords|needs_review |
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814
--- Comment #3 from Howard Chu hyc@openldap.org --- We will roll this into 2.6, but not backport to 2.5.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814
--- Comment #4 from David Coutadeur david.coutadeur@gmail.com --- Ok, thank you for your answer.
Actually, I didn't think that the contrib overlays (and especially ppm, which is an overlay extension), were also frozen in the LTS.
Can you clarify this point (if there is a defined policy)?
In the present case, there is only a new config parameter, so backward compatibility should be ensured, maybe can it be included in 2.5?
Regards, David
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814
--- Comment #5 from Howard Chu hyc@openldap.org --- Policy on contrib is they are not officially supported, so LTS does not apply to them.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814
Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@openldap.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@openldap.org --- HEAD:
• 18786c4c by David Coutadeur at 2022-03-22T19:15:37+01:00 upgrade ppm to 2.1 release (references #ITS9814)
Reject password if it contains tokens from an attribute of the LDAP entry https://github.com/ltb-project/ppm/issues/17
• e9da6241 by David Coutadeur at 2022-03-25T11:05:56+01:00 ppm: fix typo + logs example in documentation (references #ITS9814)
RE26:
• 85f38f8a by David Coutadeur at 2022-03-25T17:01:54+00:00 ITS#9814 - upgrade ppm to 2.1 release
Reject password if it contains tokens from an attribute of the LDAP entry https://github.com/ltb-project/ppm/issues/17
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9814
Quanah Gibson-Mount quanah@openldap.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED