Re: (ITS#8354) syncprov segv

Saturday, 23 January 2016

Thomas Pressnell wrote:
...
 Thanks,

 Essentially the same patch as i had (destroyed sop->s_mutex in abandon
 check rather than init later).

 I did place the o_abandon test under the while( si->si_active ) loop
 instead of above just to ensure the check is under the same lock hold
 as the list modification. 
Ah good point. Yeah, I'll move the check down.
...

 Ill grab whats in git and start tests on monday

 Have a good weekend

 Tom

-- 
   -- Howard Chu
   CTO, Symas Corp.           http://www.symas.com
   Director, Highland Sun     http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
   Chief Architect, OpenLDAP  http://www.openldap.org/project/

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006