--- Comment #3 from Michael Ströder <michael(a)stroeder.com> ---
(In reply to Howard Chu from comment #2)
(In reply to Michael Ströder from comment #1)
> How about just giving up this .666-is-experimental nonsense, define .666
> assignments as "official" and leave all OID assignments as is?
Something like that. We probably should never have had such a grab-bag
"experimental" arc in the first place.
In the future, we should simply allocate per-feature arcs,
We're probably stuck with the current .666 usages. Again, OIDs
supposed to change after they've been used in the wild. But someone should
still document what the current .666 uses are.
This means e.g. updating this:
BTW: I can't find this draft in doc/drafts/ though...
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.