https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10526
--- Comment #14 from Howard Chu hyc@openldap.org --- (In reply to Carsten Höger from comment #13)
I will now apply the 2nd patch to my local OpenLDAP package and verify whether it still improves our situation.
No need. Just use the patch in the merge request I already linked above. https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10526#c7
I only benchmarked the list-vs-list because that was suspicious. I've rewritten the range-vs-list fix because it was obviously a good thing to do. Just not written by an AI.