> steve(a)stevenwills.com wrote:
>> The slapcat man page says in the Limitations section:
>> In general, your slapd(8) should not be running (at least, not
>> read-write mode) when you do this to ensure consistency of the
> Given that back-ldbm has been deleted for 2.4, I guess we can just
> delete this sentence.
It could produce garbage data with back-ldif, and with some foreign
database module. I think it should say it's safe with bdb (and null).
Could copy it to the slapd-bdb(5) too. (I don't suggest to make
slapcat(8) refer the user to that, since there is only one example
Obviously hdb too. Would it produce garbage on 2.4?