hyc(a)symas.com writes: > steve(a)stevenwills.com wrote: >> The slapcat man page says in the Limitations section: >> >> In general, your slapd(8) should not be running (at least, not >> in >> read-write mode) when you do this to ensure consistency of the >> database. >> (...) > Given that back-ldbm has been deleted for 2.4, I guess we can just > delete this sentence. It could produce garbage data with back-ldif, and with some foreign database module. I think it should say it's safe with bdb (and null). Could copy it to the slapd-bdb(5) too. (I don't suggest to make slapcat(8) refer the user to that, since there is only one example anyway.)

-- Regards, Hallvard