openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
20985 discussions

[Issue 7788] pwdFailureTime and pwdChangedTime registered in user entry even if no ppolicy associated with the entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Jun '20

03 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7788 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #5 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- I have created a patchset that attempts to address this and other ppolicy related issues here: https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/77 Please review, test and let me know if this addresses the issue and if you have any other comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7788] pwdFailureTime and pwdChangedTime registered in user entry even if no ppolicy associated with the entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Jun '20

02 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7788 --- Comment #4 from Clément OUDOT <clement.oudot(a)worteks.com> --- I don't think this solves the issue. The problem is on entries that are not linked to any password policy are updated by ppolicy overlay. Adding a parameter in the password policy is not a good solution from my point of view. The entry should never be updated by ppolicy overlay if no ppolicy definition is applied to it. Note that this bug was opened 6 years ago, I did not test recent OpenLDAP versions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7788] pwdFailureTime and pwdChangedTime registered in user entry even if no ppolicy associated with the entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Jun '20

02 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7788 --- Comment #3 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- Hi Clément, this should still be possible if you set a default policy with pwdMaxRecordedFailure == 0, is there a reason this would not be appropriate before we go changing the default behaviour? Thanks, Ondrej -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8888] doc: sdf number disorder
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 01 Jun '20

01 Jun '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8888 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |TEST Keywords|OL_2_5_REQ | --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Commits: • 47974536 by Quanah Gibson-Mount at 2020-06-01T19:05:26+00:00 Issue #8888 - Change numbered list to Note format -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8675] tools continuing after ldap_start_tls_ returns non-LDAP error
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 May '20

28 May '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8675 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|has_patch, IPR_OK, | |openldap-scratch | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9020] Inconsistent cn=config objectClasses for overlays
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 May '20

27 May '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9020 --- Comment #4 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- In fact, for autoCA, I'm not a fan of the other olc config attr names either -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9020] Inconsistent cn=config objectClasses for overlays
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 May '20

27 May '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9020 --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- and Dyngroup does this as well -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9020] Inconsistent cn=config objectClasses for overlays
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 May '20

27 May '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9020 --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- autoca continues this unfortunate trend -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8888] doc: sdf number disorder
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 May '20

27 May '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8888 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #1 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/75 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7530] gethostbyname_r fails if initial buffer size is too small
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 27 May '20

27 May '20

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7530 --- Comment #4 from ujvari(a)microsec.hu <ujvari(a)microsec.hu> --- Én köszönöm a javítást. It's me who thank you for fixing the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs