https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8143
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|slapd |libraries
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5974
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #7 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
None of this applies to libldap(_r)/liblber in master anymore. Nor does slapd
seem to reference ldap_int_* symbols directly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8768
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #5 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6467
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Depends on| |8768
--- Comment #5 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Code to implement this is in a merge request here:
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/5
Referenced Issues:
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8768
[Issue 8768] Syncprov shouldn't send a new cookie at the end of delete phase
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8768
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks| |6467
Referenced Issues:
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6467
[Issue 6467] syncrepl enhancements
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6207
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|ondra(a)mistotebe.net |bugs(a)openldap.org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8182
--- Comment #2 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
Dealing with this would need access to the attribute type in the other set
we're joining with so the literal 'canBrowse' could be normalised accordingly.
But the way set ACLs are parsed at the moment, there is no way to keep and
propagate this information. We might have to turn to a parser generator to get
an AST and annotate accordingly if this is needed. That would in turn make us
require YACC or whatever we chose.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7089
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #7 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
I have created a patchset that attempts to address this and other ppolicy
related issues here:
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/77
Please review, test and let me know if this addresses the issue and if you have
any other comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8762
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #10 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
I have created a patchset that attempts to address this and other ppolicy
related issues here:
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/77
Please review, test and let me know if this addresses the issue and if you have
any other comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
--- Comment #4 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
I have created a patchset that attempts to address this and other ppolicy
related issues here:
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/77
Please review, test and let me know if this addresses the issue and if you have
any other comments.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.