openldap-bugs

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
21117 discussions

[Issue 7441] cn=config filters ignore {number}
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '25

02 Dec '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7441 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7392] ACL a_dn.a_self is skipped in case of "acl_mask: to all values ..."
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '25

02 Dec '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7392 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|hyc(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7347] Exclusive bit masks for: ACL_WADD, ACL_WDEL, and ACL_WRITE
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '25

02 Dec '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7347 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|hyc(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7335] Create process for updating man pages to handle both cn=config and slapd.conf configurations
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '25

02 Dec '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7335 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.7.0 |2.7.1 --- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- Use slapo-auditlog(5) and slapo-homedir(5) as templates -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7047] slapd crash on bad indexed translucent
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '25

02 Dec '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7047 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7047] slapd crash on bad indexed translucent
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '25

02 Dec '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7047 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |SUSPENDED --- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- suspending as no reports since move to lmdb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6942] updateref config is inadequate
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '25

02 Dec '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6942 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.7.0 |2.8.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6531] Modify updateref to generate referrals on the backend
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '25

02 Dec '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6531 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.7.0 |2.8.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10409] New: Implement password policies for the rootdn
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '25

02 Dec '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10409 Issue ID: 10409 Summary: Implement password policies for the rootdn Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.10 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 31621968(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- We have successfully configured the Password Policy overlay (ppolicy) on our OpenLDAP server. This configuration ensures that accounts are locked after exceeding the maximum number of failed bind attempts, as defined by the policy. For example, if the ppolicy is set to lock an account after 5 failed bind attempts, the server enforces this behavior effectively for all users under the ppolicy scope. However, we have observed that the rootdn user does not seem to be subject to these same password policies. Specifically, even when the rootdn exceeds the maximum number of failed bind attempts, it does not get locked or restricted in any way. We would like to know if there is a way to apply the same password policies (e.g., account locking after failed bind attempts) to the rootdn. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 10406] New: Write regression since 0.9.19
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 02 Dec '25

02 Dec '25

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10406 Issue ID: 10406 Summary: Write regression since 0.9.19 Product: LMDB Version: 0.9.33 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ben.alex(a)acegi.com.au Target Milestone: --- I maintain LmdbJava, a Java wrapper for LMDB. We have an extensive benchmark suite covering read, cursor, and write pathways, with isolated testing of LMDB versions from 0.9.17 through 0.9.33. Results: https://lmdb-benchmark.lmdbjava.org/ ============================================== SUMMARY ============================================== Read performance: 0.9.33 consistently outperforms 0.9.17 across all read benchmarks. Write performance: Consistent regression since 0.9.19: ---------------------------------- Tag ms/op vs 0.9.17 ---------------------------------- LMDB_0.9.17 75.790 baseline LMDB_0.9.18 74.909 -1.2% LMDB_0.9.19 81.404 +7.4% LMDB_0.9.20 83.459 +10.1% LMDB_0.9.21 83.237 +9.8% LMDB_0.9.22 83.027 +9.5% LMDB_0.9.23 82.870 +9.3% LMDB_0.9.24 82.952 +9.4% LMDB_0.9.27 82.989 +9.5% LMDB_0.9.28 83.025 +9.5% LMDB_0.9.29 83.063 +9.6% LMDB_0.9.30 83.237 +9.8% LMDB_0.9.31 88.419 +16.7% LMDB_0.9.33 83.304 +9.9% Excluding 0.9.31 as an outlier, write performance degraded by approximately 9% from 0.9.20 and has remained at that level through 0.9.33. ============================================== BENCHMARK DETAILS ============================================== The write benchmark sequentially inserts 1,000,000 entries (100-byte values, 4-byte integer keys) into a database opened with MDB_INTEGERKEY, using a single cursor with MDB_APPEND flag. The benchmark includes 2 warmup iterations and 3 measurement iterations of 120 seconds each. ============================================== ANALYSIS ============================================== Reviewing the commit history, the regressions appear linked to correctness fixes: - 0.9.19: ITS#8406 (xcursor fixup after cursor_del) - 0.9.20: ITS#8557 (cursor_last and C_EOF handling) Both issues added cursor state management overhead in write-heavy code paths. ============================================== REQUEST ============================================== Could you please reproduce this regression using a native C benchmark to confirm it's not JNI-specific? If confirmed, this may be a necessary performance/correctness tradeoff given that most LMDB workloads are read-heavy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
...
2112
Older →

Jump to page:

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs