https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10149
Issue ID: 10149
Summary: [PATCH] Allow certificates and keys to be read from
URIs.
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: minfrin(a)sharp.fm
Target Milestone: ---
Add the LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_URIS and LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_CACERTURIS
options to allow certificates and keys to be set using OpenSSL
provider URIs.
The attached patch file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the
modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were
developed by Graham Leggett minfrin(a)sharp.fm. I have not assigned rights and/or
interest in this work to any party.
The attached modifications to OpenLDAP Software are subject to the following
notice:
Copyright 2023 Graham Leggett
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted only as authorized by the OpenLDAP Public License.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10300
Issue ID: 10300
Summary: Add detailed instructions for MRs to "Guidelines for
Contributing" page
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: smckinney(a)symas.com
Target Milestone: ---
The current page covers submitting patches but doesn't adequately cover
creating merge requests. This provides a barrier for new developers.
In addition to clarifying when a change should be submitted with a patch or
merge request, it could provide a set of steps including creating a fork,
branch, squash, fixup, naming conventions and other info that would be lost on
a new contributor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9245
Bug ID: 9245
Summary: devel/programming needs rewrite
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
The information on the devel/programming web page is at least a decade out of
date and needs a complete overhaul.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10298
Issue ID: 10298
Summary: cannot find DN in memberOf attribute when dynlist
overlay contains multiple memberOf definitions
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.13
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: jan.pekar(a)imatic.cz
Target Milestone: ---
I'm using dynlist to define multiple static objectClasses (static-oc) to be
searched for member attributes and added to memberOf attribute.
My configuration is in cn=config, so I defined it using multiple olcDlAttrSet
attributes
groupOfURLs memberURL member+memberOf@groupOfMembers*
groupOfURLs memberURL member+memberOf@groupOfNames*
I noticed, that memberOf attribute contains users from both groups
(groupOfMembers and groupOfNames) but I can use search operation to only first
defined configuration (in above example groupOfMembers) and user membership
from groupOfNames groups is not found.
Maybe it must be defined in one line but I was not able to find proper syntax.
Maybe attribute must be mapped somehow but when it works for first definition,
should be working for next one so it is bug?
Thank you
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8988
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|VERIFIED |CONFIRMED
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8988
Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|slapd |liblmdb
Version|2.4.47 |0.9.33
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone|--- |0.9.34
Product|OpenLDAP |LMDB
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7249
OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS
Assignee|bugs(a)openldap.org |ondra(a)mistotebe.net
--- Comment #21 from OndÅ™ej KuznÃk <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> ---
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/742
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10084
Issue ID: 10084
Summary: Move away from DIGEST-MD5 as a default in the test
suite
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: test suite
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
cyrus-sasl seem on the verge or removing the DIGEST-MD5 mechanism from 2.2
onwards. As such we should update our defaults in a couple of our test scripts
for master/2.7 at least. Are SCRAM mechanisms the go-to these days?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9739
Issue ID: 9739
Summary: Undefined reference to ber_sockbuf_io_udp in 2.6.0
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: simon.pichugin(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
While I was trying to build OpenLDAP 2.6 on Fedora Rawhide I've got the error
message:
/usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to
`ber_sockbuf_io_udp'
I've checked commits from https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 and
found that 'ber_sockbuf_io_udp' was not added to
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/liblber/…
I've asked on the project's mailing list and got a reply:
"That symbol only exists if OpenLDAP is built with LDAP_CONNECTIONLESS
defined, which is not a supported feature. Feel free to file a bug report
at https://bugs.openldap.org/"
https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-technical@openldap.org/…
Hence, creating the bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10295
Issue ID: 10295
Summary: To compare strings in Java
Product: JLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: JLDAP
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: chetansinha35(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 1044
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1044&action=edithttps://docs.vultr.com/java/java/examples/java/examples/reverse-a-number
Java Program to Reversing a number in Java is a common task achieved using
loops and arithmetic operations. By repeatedly extracting the last digit of the
number with the modulus operator (%) and constructing the reversed number using
multiplication and addition, the process is efficient. For example, a while
loop can be used to iterate until the number becomes zero, applying reversed =
reversed * 10 + number % 10. This logic makes reversing numbers simple and
highlights Java's flexibility in handling number manipulation tasks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.