- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 8618] Remove deprecated -h HOST and -p PORT options from clients
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 24 Jan '24

24 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8618 --- Comment #23 from jel+git(a)linofee.org --- Just upgraded a server from Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04, which contains 2.5.x and found out, that the options -p and -h got dropped - and requires me to adjust quite a bit of scripts because of this non-sense. This is such a poor software management and versioning, hard to believe, that anyone who allowed it to go through, has any experience in enterprise ready software. 1) If one decides to drop an option, it should be a) communicated clearly. b) documented and alternatives shown 2) If a software gets released, which has an incompatible change wrt. previous major.minor.tiny version, it should rise the major number of the software version, so that OS/Distro vendors are warned and may decide to stick with the old version. There are several options to allow -H and -h,-p side by side - openldap has chosen the worst option. This might be a hint, how poor its maintenance actually is/how bad the support by sysmas probably is. This is also a good example, that for OS/Distro vendors it is sometimes a really good thing to stick with the older version instead of switching to the "latest" stuff. Anyway, thanx for the work. =8-( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10158] New: Linker error when building openldap-2.4.59
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 Jan '24

23 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10158 Issue ID: 10158 Summary: Linker error when building openldap-2.4.59 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.59 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: umagmrit(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10013] New: Some code (ppolicy, etc.) ignores REP_CTRLS_MUSTBEFREED when touching rs->sr_ctrls
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 17 Jan '24

17 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10013 Issue ID: 10013 Summary: Some code (ppolicy, etc.) ignores REP_CTRLS_MUSTBEFREED when touching rs->sr_ctrls Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Certain parts of the source indicate that rs->sr_ctrls shouldn't be realloc'd/free'd unless REP_CTRLS_MUSTBEFREED is set, but then other parts of slapd (slap_ctrl_whatFailed_add, glue_op_search?, ...) and overlays (ppolicy, syncprov, ...) will blindly overwrite and/or realloc it. slap_add_control() (an analog of slap_add_controls()) might be useful for this, possibly alongside some way to free the other data kept around to streamline the code other users need for correct operation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 9944] New: Reverting an olcDbACLBind statement breaks proxied write operations
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9944 Issue ID: 9944 Summary: Reverting an olcDbACLBind statement breaks proxied write operations Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- On a system with olcDbIDAssertBind configured, and proxied authorizations working correctly, an olcDbACLBind statement was added to the configuration for lastbind support. However an incorrect identity was in place for the authzid in the ACL bind statement which caused proxy authorization to fail. The change was backed out (There was never any change to the olcDbIDAssertBind config fragment) and after that, all write operations failed instead of being proxied, with err=80. Restarting slapd fixed the issue, which indicates an underlying problem in the cn=config db in reverting to the original working state. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10151] New: Leaks in do_syncrep2() when error handling
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10151 Issue ID: 10151 Summary: Leaks in do_syncrep2() when error handling Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Investigating the persistent CI failures in test050, I can see some memory leaks that should be tackled (if only to reduce noise). For one, when receiving an entry without a syncrepl control attached or when dealing with a concurrent thread removing that consumer, we leak our scratch data (decoded controls, modlist, ...). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10137] New: Ease redefining the MDB_IDL_LOGN value
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10137 Issue ID: 10137 Summary: Ease redefining the MDB_IDL_LOGN value Product: LMDB Version: 0.9.30 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: renault.cle(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 992 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=992&action=edit The patch do apply to midl.h Hello, I would like to slightly change the midl.h c file to make it possible to change the MDB_IDL_LOGN define without having to fork on my side. I know it can be redefined to reduce the amount of memory allocated by LMDB. I am using the latest `mdb.master` branch version of LMDB. https://github.com/mozilla/lmdb/pull/2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 10157] New: mdb_load doesn't build for me
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10157 Issue ID: 10157 Summary: mdb_load doesn't build for me Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: vl(a)samba.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 1001 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1001&action=edit Patch see attached patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 7420] Possible to bypass overlay unique and constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED --- Comment #10 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • f5c96f44 by Howard Chu at 2024-01-10T17:05:13+00:00 ITS#7420 move entry_naming_check earlier in Add • 7debe76f by Howard Chu at 2024-01-15T16:43:56+00:00 ITS#7420 re-fix slapcommon.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10154] New: Configure auto close for pull requests created on github
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Jan '24

16 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10154 Issue ID: 10154 Summary: Configure auto close for pull requests created on github Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Configure the auto close action for PRs created on Github. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 7420] Possible to bypass overlay unique and constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 --- Comment #9 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Ondřej Kuzník from comment #8) > The patch in MR!665 (now in master) has introduced a regression in slapadd > not filling in the implicit RDN attributes. Try removing line 7 > (olcDatabase: {0}config) in tests/data/slapd-dynamic.ldif and run test062. I see, the naming check needed to happen before the schema check. Fixed now in master. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 7420] Possible to bypass overlay unique and constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Jan '24

15 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 --- Comment #8 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- The patch in MR!665 (now in master) has introduced a regression in slapadd not filling in the implicit RDN attributes. Try removing line 7 (olcDatabase: {0}config) in tests/data/slapd-dynamic.ldif and run test062. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10156] New: Any recorded crash-consistency bugs/vulnerabilities in LMDB for study?
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jan '24

14 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10156 Issue ID: 10156 Summary: Any recorded crash-consistency bugs/vulnerabilities in LMDB for study? Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: yilegu(a)cs.washington.edu Target Milestone: --- Dear LMDB developers, Hello! I am Michael Gu, a CS PhD student at the University of Washington, advised by Prof. Baris Kasikci. We are building a software testing tool that can test the crash-consistency of POSIX applications. The tool also supports testing MMIO-based applications and we think LMDB is a perfect evaluation target. We are wondering if there are any recorded crash consistency bugs/vulnerabilities during the development of the LMDB database. If so, could you kindly provide some pointers to which version of the LMDB database has such issues and if possible the Github commit or Issue ID on OpenLDAP issue tracking system correspondingly? Thank you so much in advance! Bests, Michael Gu ----------------- Yile (Michael) Gu CSE Ph.D. Student University of Washington -- Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering yilegu(a)cs.washington.edu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 8826] Contrib dsaschema module needs updating for cn=config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8826 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • 69a4a03a by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-12-05T16:56:29+00:00 ITS#8826 Allow minimal dsaschema configuration in cn=config -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8852] slapd memory use grows continuously with non-delta syncrepl and modifying groups
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8852 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • 8986f99d by Ondřej Kuzník at 2023-11-14T18:09:10+00:00 ITS#8852 Optimise attr_cmp for sortval attributes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8180] back-sock should not return sucess in case of error
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8180 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|IN_PROGRESS |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- • 64789dd2 by Howard Chu at 2023-11-14T17:02:18+00:00 ITS#8180 back-sock: return error when str2entry fails • 66edd345 by Howard Chu at 2023-11-14T17:02:18+00:00 ITS#8677 back-sock: return error for CONTINUE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9660] New: back-mdb Permission denied => Restore from backup
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9660 Issue ID: 9660 Summary: back-mdb Permission denied => Restore from backup Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: geert.hendrickx(a)telenetgroup.be Target Milestone: --- Cosmetic issue: When an mdb database has incorrect ownership or permissions (typically after slapadd as root), back-mdb fails with: mdb_db_open: database "dc=my-domain,dc=com" cannot be opened: Permission denied (13). Restore from backup! "Permission denied" is correct, but "Restore from backup" is maybe not the most appropriate advice. ;-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10150] New: liblber/etest.c calls open with O_CREAT without specifying file mode
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '24

12 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10150 Issue ID: 10150 Summary: liblber/etest.c calls open with O_CREAT without specifying file mode Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: alan.coopersmith(a)oracle.com Target Milestone: --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_6_6/li… has this call to the open() function: if (( fd = open( "lber-test", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_BINARY )) Since O_CREAT is specified, there should be a third argument specifying the file permissions for the newly created file, but it is missing here, which may cause the file to be created with permissions based on whatever noise is in the register or stack position the call reads the third argument from on a given platform. Fortunately, it looks like this code may never be compiled, since it's inside #ifdef HAVE_CONSOLE_H and I can't find anywhere that is set, since it's not in any AC_CONFIG_HEADER checks in the configure.ac file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 10125] New: mdb_load: fix loading in Append mode
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Jan '24

11 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10125 Issue ID: 10125 Summary: mdb_load: fix loading in Append mode Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- After committing/flushing a batch of writes, the cursor is not correctly reinitialized in Append mode. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 8498] slapadd complains about missing attrs
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 11 Jan '24

11 Jan '24

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8498 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|TEST |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- head: • 2939df1a by Howard Chu at 2023-11-02T16:53:26+00:00 ITS#8498 slapadd: silence warning for NULL entry -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10148] New: About
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 26 Dec '23

26 Dec '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10148 Issue ID: 10148 Summary: About Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: pinkilhagency(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Welcome to LH Talent Agency, a leading provider of live hosting talent for events and productions. In the fast-paced world of live hosting, finding the perfect individual to engage and captivate your audience is crucial. That's where LH Talent Agency comes in. With our extensive network of experienced and dynamic hosts, we can match you with the perfect talent to ensure your event is a success. Whether you need a skilled emcee, a charismatic presenter, or a engaging host, LH Talent Agency has the expertise and resources to meet your needs. Read on to learn more about how LH Talent Agency can elevate your live hosting experience. More Info - https://livehosting.xyz/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10146] New: Typo in doc/man/man3/lber-decode.3
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Dec '23

19 Dec '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10146 Issue ID: 10146 Summary: Typo in doc/man/man3/lber-decode.3 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: joshua(a)joshua.hu Target Milestone: --- In doc/man/man3/lber-decode.3 it states that the fmt for null is: n Null. No parameter is required. The element is simply skipped if it is recognized. Should it not be 'N'? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 7420] Possible to bypass overlay unique and constraint
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 19 Dec '23

19 Dec '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7420 Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS --- Comment #7 from Howard Chu <hyc(a)openldap.org> --- Fix in https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/665 please test -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10131] New: wildcard search crash slapd with OU containing parenthesis
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Dec '23

12 Dec '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10131 Issue ID: 10131 Summary: wildcard search crash slapd with OU containing parenthesis Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.16 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: bourguijl(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Dears, When I do following ldapsearch as following : ldapsearch -x -H ldap://hostname:3891 -b "o=mobistar.be" -s subtree "(&(objectClass=groupOfUniqueNames)(uniqueMember=uid=jlb,ou=*,o=mobistar.be))" cn dn and the DB is containing these entries : dn: uid=jlb,ou=Test (aa),ou=Partners,o=mobistar.be dn: ou=Test (aa),ou=Partners,o=mobistar.be even if this "uid=jlb" isn't member of a group as uniqueMember, it makes slapd crashing. I did test it on versions 2.5.7 & 2.5.16, same result --> slapd crashed. Seems to be related to parenthesis presence in OU attribut. Is it a bug ? Thx, Jean-Luc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9717] New: The RADIUSOV overlay can be incorporated into OpenLDAP
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Nov '23

28 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9717 Issue ID: 9717 Summary: The RADIUSOV overlay can be incorporated into OpenLDAP Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: rdubner(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10132] New: manage syncrepl as a cn=config entry
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Nov '23

28 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10132 Issue ID: 10132 Summary: manage syncrepl as a cn=config entry Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Maybe it being exposed through both places (olcSyncrepl and the entry) could be a way to manage the transition (unless we have a way to handle cn=config schema upgrades internally). Uncertain as to how that affects cn=config replication. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 8826] Contrib dsaschema module needs updating for cn=config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Nov '23

28 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8826 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |IN_PROGRESS Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/661 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6166] Overlay/backend restructuring
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 Nov '23

23 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6166 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=10135 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 10134] New: OpenLDAP Docker Installation and Migration
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Nov '23

22 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10134 Issue ID: 10134 Summary: OpenLDAP Docker Installation and Migration Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: chilimili1(a)outlook.de Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 990 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=990&action=edit Dockerfile.txt logs_importfile.txt logs_slaptest.txt Hi, I am currently experiencing issues while building a Docker container for OpenLDAP. I hope that an expert from the community can help me solve my problem. Issue 1: Docker Setup I'm in the process of setting up OpenLDAP within a Docker container on a RHEL 9 base OS. I've attached the Dockerfile I'm using for reference. My primary concern is that when I run the command RUN slaptest -f /tmp/slapd.conf -F /etc/openldap/slapd.d -d 1, it fails with mdb_db_open: database "dc=my-domain,dc=com": dbenv_open(/usr/var/openldap-data). mdb_db_open: database "dc=my-domain,dc=com" cannot be opened: No such file or directory (2). Restore from backup!. Interestingly, slaptest -u seems to work fine. I would greatly appreciate it if you could review my Dockerfile or provide insights into what might be causing this issue. Issue 2: LDAP Migration Additionally, I'm trying to migrate configuration data from a system using OpenLDAP 2.4.50 to OpenLDAP 2.5.13. During this process, I encountered the following error: csharp Copy code olcAuthzRegexp: value #0: keyword <olcAuthzRegexp> missing <regexp> <DN> argument slapadd: could not add entry dn="cn=config" (line=1) Dockerfile.txt logs_importfile.txt logs_slaptest.txt I'm not sure if these issues are related, but I thought it would be best to ask for your expertise on both matters. Thank you in advance for your assistance. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10133] New: We tried to use centralized authentication for the root account, but it failed.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Nov '23

20 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10133 Issue ID: 10133 Summary: We tried to use centralized authentication for the root account, but it failed. Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: liubo335(a)huawei.com Target Milestone: --- When sssd+ldap is used for centralized authentication of Linux users, it is found that only non-root users can be authenticated, but the root user cannot be authenticated. Therefore, I would like to ask whether the authentication of the root user is not supported. If yes, what additional configuration items do you need to pay attention to when authenticating the root user? Looking forward to your answer, thank you very much. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 8890] adapt to 64-bit time_t on systems with 32-bit long
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8890 --- Comment #15 from tg(a)debian.org <tg(a)debian.org> --- FWIW, Debian is going to switch 32-bit ARM (with 32-bit long) to 64-bit time_t and off_t soon, and others, even m68k, will follow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6097] MMR problems with deletes
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6097 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|2.7.0 |3.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6942] updateref config is inadequate
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6942 --- Comment #4 from Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> --- Maybe putting updateref on the syncrepl consumer configuration is a way to deal with this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 6198] Authorization for extensions
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6198 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|enhancement |blocker Priority|--- |Highest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9009] 2.7: Switch to LMDB v1.0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9009 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |blocker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8890] adapt to 64-bit time_t on systems with 32-bit long
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8890 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|Low |Normal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9719] New: refreshOnly sends empty cookie when client up to date
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Nov '23

16 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9719 Issue ID: 9719 Summary: refreshOnly sends empty cookie when client up to date Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Syncprov will send an empty cookie if the consumer has the same cookie as provider. To the best of my knowledge this is not in line with RFC4533 and consumers would effectively drop their cookie when the search finishes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 10065] New: slapd needs a config option for the ssf of an external security proxy using "proxy protocol v2"
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Nov '23

14 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10065 Issue ID: 10065 Summary: slapd needs a config option for the ssf of an external security proxy using "proxy protocol v2" Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sean(a)teletech.com.au Target Milestone: --- Commit 146889f introduced support for the haproxy "proxy protocol v2". A very welcome addition that allows an external security layer to be implemented. This implementation is however somewhat hobbled. Cyrus SASL uses "Security Strength Factors" or "ssf" to determine what Authentication mechanisms to offer. slapd conveys the implicit security of UNIX domain sockets to the SASL layer by specifying a non-zero ssf for these connections. This can be configured with the "olcLocalSSF" config setting. For implicit/explicit TLS connections, the "olcSecurity: tls=<n>" provides the cryptographic strength of the TLS layer to the SASL layer. For an external TLS-terminating proxy, there does not appear to be any way to inform Cyrus SASL of the presence of TLS security on these proxied connections. The outcome of this is that PLAIN and EXTERNAL authentication mechanisms are not offered to clients connecting through the secure proxy. This can be overcome by weakening the security properties of the SASL layer with the olcSaslSecProps configuration option, but this weakening will apply to all clients, not just clients connecting via the secure proxy. What is required is some way to tell slapd and it's integrated SASL layer about the presence of TLS encryption on the proxy's input. As a precaution, this might be restricted to slapd connections in the 127.0.0.0/8 [IPv6:::] address ranges. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

2 29

[Issue 9902] New: Make max index DBs for back-mdb configurable
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Nov '23

14 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9902 Issue ID: 9902 Summary: Make max index DBs for back-mdb configurable Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- From ITS#9895: Currently there is a hardcoded limit of 128 index DBs in back-mdb. Some sites want more than this (although there's no evidence they actually use more than 128 attributes in all of their applications' search filters). For 2.5/2.6 we can simply double the constant. For 2.7 consider making it configurable. Note that increasing the number increases the size of an LMDB transaction structure, and also increases the time needed to initialize it whenever creating a transaction, so it's a bad idea to just set this to an arbitrarily large number. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 9829] New: set timeouts in remoteauth overlay
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Nov '23

14 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9829 Issue ID: 9829 Summary: set timeouts in remoteauth overlay Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.11 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Currently, it seems there is no way to configure timeouts in the remoteauth overlay. For example, if I define a remoteauth_mapping with a file containing a list of hostnames, the first one is checked first. After "remoteauth_retry_count" * "connect_timeout" seconds, (210s on my system), remoteauth test the second server in the list. In some circumstances, it could be nice to set the connect timeout lower (or higher). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9677] New: Create "make install-strip” target
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Nov '23

14 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9677 Issue ID: 9677 Summary: Create "make install-strip” target Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.7 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: dpa-openldap(a)aegee.org Target Milestone: --- All open source make-based projects shall follow the same naming and semantics of targets, described at https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Standard-Targets.html . In particular “make install-strip” shall strip the binaries during the installation, while “make install” shall not strip them. In openldap currently “make install” does strip, which surprised me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 10128] New: Unavailability of OpenSSL 3.X compatible openldap lib libldap_r.so
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Nov '23

14 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10128 Issue ID: 10128 Summary: Unavailability of OpenSSL 3.X compatible openldap lib libldap_r.so Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: umakanta.senapati(a)netwitness.com Target Milestone: --- Hi Team, We are looking for openldap lib libldap_r.so compatible with openssl 3.x for el8 platform. From the release note i could check Open ldap has added openSSL 3.X support from version 2.5X onwards. But we couldn’t find any open ldap el8 rpm available with OpenSSL3.X support for 2.5.x or higher version. Please correct me if my understanding is wrong. Is there any plan to provide open ldap el8 rpm with libldap_r.so compatible with Openssl 3.X. Please help me if i can build the open ldap libldap_r.so with opensll 3.x lib or not? If yes please share the guide lines for the same. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 10099] New: OpenLDAP version 2.5 & 2.6 causes IP connectivity to break and breaks basic commands like reboot
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Nov '23

09 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10099 Issue ID: 10099 Summary: OpenLDAP version 2.5 & 2.6 causes IP connectivity to break and breaks basic commands like reboot Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.16 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: amcwongahey(a)rbbn.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 980 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=980&action=edit The package Makefile I am upgrading openLDAP from version 2.4.59 to 2.5.16 and am running into show stopper issues. In my environment I am running CLIENT mode only (libldap). I have tried 2.5.16 with the following combinations: openSSL version 1.1.1s and 3.0.8 Kernel versions: 5.4.92, 4.19.192 and 2.6.32 Problems described below ONLY happens when connecting with a domain controller using LDAPS - does NOT happen with LDAP (non-secure). When I use ANY combination that includes kernel version 4 or 5 along with openLDAP 2.5.16 I get random lockups to the point where IP connectivity breaks into and out of the node. And also it is so completely hosed that even issuing a reboot command from the console completely hangs and does not restart the node. The problem happens roughly 50% of the time with openLDAP combined with version 5 kernel but happens noticeably less frequently with the version 4 kernel. As soon as I kill the process that invokes the connection with openLDAP the problem clears up. I invoke the connection with the following function call: nReturnCode = ldap_sasl_bind( m_pLD, m_ADBind.GetBindDN(), LDAP_SASL_SIMPLE, &stPassword, NULL, NULL, &nMsgID); I use simple auth simply because the entire connection is secured with TLS anyway and there is another functional reason which I cannot go into details on. OpenLDAP never returns from the ldap_sasl_bind function call. It hangs somewhere inside the library but that alone cannot account for the complete lockup where basic commands like reboot, etc do not work and where all IP connectivity breaks. It seems it has to be something with openLDAP and the Linux kernel combined that triggers this issue. I am hoping that someone who is much more familiar with the libldap part of the library will pick up on this and be able to determine how to fix this. As an FYI: I also tried the very first version of 2.5.1 (alpha release) and the latest 2.6 and the problem happens on those versions as well. To be clear the problem does NOT happen if I run openLDAP 2.5.16 with Linux kernel version 2.6.32. ADDITIONALLY ALL openSSL & kernel combinations works with openLDAP version 2.4.59! I am attaching the package Makefile to this report. Below is the ldap.conf contents: TLS_REQCERT never TLS_KEY /tmp/ssl/certs/server.pem TLS_CERT /tmp/ssl/certs/server.pem TLS_PROTOCOL_MIN 3.1 sasl_secprops maxssf=0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 9009] 2.7: Switch to LMDB v1.0
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9009 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |db_reload -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9612] New: Change index_hash64 default to on
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9612 Issue ID: 9612 Summary: Change index_hash64 default to on Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Change the default value of index_hash64. By default this means slapd won't run on a 32-bit CPU (It will continue to work on 32-bit OSes running on 64-bit CPUs). If someone needs to run slapd on a 32-bit CPU they can turn this option off. In the documentation, mark the option as deprecated for eventual removal in a future release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 9580] New: Refresh vs. accesslog in delta-MPR
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9580 Issue ID: 9580 Summary: Refresh vs. accesslog in delta-MPR Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: replication Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- A server consuming a plain syncrepl session (might be a delta-MMR refresh) still has to log the entries into accesslog, however that accesslog stops being capable of serving as a delta-sync source: - operation entryCSNs will be out-of-order - the changes logged will not be the intended modifications (e.g. if we fell back after a conflict, the conflicting entry will be replaced with the other version, other examples available) We need to deal with that somehow, at the very least we need to make sure the consumer will not take them at face value. We could record this in the accesslog root entry if we can detect when this starts and match it up with the final cookie, syncprov would still need some tweaks to understand it. We could mark the entries received this way and make sure delta-consumers treat them as "poison", as if they were running a plain syncrepl session themselves (not update contextCSN until that's finished, mark its own accesslog entries this way, ...). Anything like that needs guarantees that it will clean itself up once all of the real plain sessions finish otherwise we've lost delta-sync altogether. A different approach might or might not be needed for live delta-persist sessions replicating from a refreshing provider, but at least that syncprov has a way of detecting this live if it chooses to. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 13

[Issue 9341] New: Delta-sync MPR needs to be stable regardless of ordering
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9341 Issue ID: 9341 Summary: Delta-sync MPR needs to be stable regardless of ordering Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: replication Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- If two or more updates are spread across several providers before they have a chance to learn about the others, all replicas need to arrive at the same content regardless of the order in which they arrive. One example that is broken at the moment: - (csn a) server 1 accepts a modify - (csn b) server 2 accepts a delete on the same DN - (csn c) server 2 accepts an add on that DN again If a replica receives the actions in the order bca vs. abc, the content of the entry will be different even though the final CSN set is the same -> they will never converge. The ordering 'bac' also needs to result in eventual convergence, even if it means a refresh or replication from either provider stalling temporarily? Merge request with this test case (so far): https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/merge_requests/145 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 11

[Issue 9577] New: slapd -V should be deprecated
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9577 Issue ID: 9577 Summary: slapd -V should be deprecated Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: smckinney(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Sometimes a user's (present one included) ignorance gets them in trouble unnecessarily. The -V option is an example... Normally, when one wants to determine the version of a process, they use -V, or perhaps -v. With slapd, the daemon actually continues to run, which can have negative consequences. The doc clearly states that -VV is probably what the user wants, but is counter-intutive. Who RTFM's before checking the version? -V print version info (-VV exit afterwards, -VVV print info about static overlays and backends) I propose we eliminate the option to allow slapd to continue running after displaying the version. Perhaps we eliminate the -V option entirely, or just make it work the same as -VV. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9547] New: OpenLDAP does not send port as SPN when authenticating SASL GSSAPI
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9547 Issue ID: 9547 Summary: OpenLDAP does not send port as SPN when authenticating SASL GSSAPI Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.44 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: robert.wilson1717(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- When trying to authenticate to an ADLDS server using kerberos and a MIT ccache, OpenLdap only passes the hostname to the SASL mechanism, causing a mismatch between the SPN in the client "ldap/adlds.my.domain" and the one registered in AD "ldap/adlds.my.domain:50000" Is there a way fo forcing OpenLDAP to pass the port as part of the SASL request? Or is there a part of the OpenLDAP -> Cyprus-SASL -> MIT KRB5 chain where this can be enabled? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9506] New: dynlist: member expansion when member attribute not requested
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9506 Issue ID: 9506 Summary: dynlist: member expansion when member attribute not requested Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- When configured to do dynamic "member" expansion, i.e.: overlay dynlist dynlist-attrset groupOfURLs memberURL member Any query against an object that would trigger this expansion will incur a penalty while dynlist does the expansion work even if there was no request for the member attribute. Currently that can be worked around by specifying the manageDSAit control when doing a search on the object, but this may not be feasible for some client applications and additionally other directory servers do not do this expansion for their dynamic group implementations unless the underlying configured attribute is explicitly requested. We've already implemented this in dynlist for the memberOfAD case, we should do it here as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9269] New: "hidden" "subordinate" database is shown in a directory tree
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Nov '23

07 Nov '23

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9269 Issue ID: 9269 Summary: "hidden" "subordinate" database is shown in a directory tree Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: grapvar(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- "hidden" configuration option is ignored by slapd (not honored by "glue" overlay?) if the database it tries to hide is also a "subordinate" database. Checked for openldap 2.4.47 and current git master (f3952d9). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs