- openldap-bugs - openldap.org

[Issue 9911] New: MDB_PROBLEM: Unexpected problem - txn should abort, because of mdb_page_loose
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 21 Sep '22

21 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9911 Issue ID: 9911 Summary: MDB_PROBLEM: Unexpected problem - txn should abort, because of mdb_page_loose Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: info(a)parlepeuple.fr Target Milestone: --- In mdb.master3, when running some test suite, the transaction commit fails with MDB_PROBLEM: Unexpected problem - txn should abort The operation that where executed on a blank database: mdb_env_create mdb_env_open with CREATE mode mdb_txn_begin RW mdb_put one key value mdb_txn_commit mdb_txn_begin RW mdb_drop mdb_txn_commit This last commit fails with : MDB_PROBLEM: Unexpected problem - txn should abort My investigation shows that the lines 4401-4403 are triggered: if ((unsigned)txn->mt_loose_count != txn->mt_u.dirty_list[0].mid) { rc = MDB_PROBLEM; /* mt_loose_pgs does not match dirty_list */ goto fail; } And this is because of the commit #12ee1a2 "Use mdb_page_loose() more" https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/commit/12ee1a2d7104616ccb812db… that does a mdb_page_loose instead of a mdb_midl_append on line 9496. Reverting this commit solves the problem. This commit seems to be a non essential optimization. But you will see into it as i am not so familiar with the refactoring that Hallvard Furuseth did back in July 2017. It would be nice to have an official fix from you, instead of this revert I did temporally to be able to continue working. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

Using self signed certificate causes ldap_sasl_bind_s() error
by rinchive＠gmail.com 20 Sep '22

20 Sep '22

Hi. I'm trying to use C code of your gitlab repository to make a program that can bind to remote LDAP server. I have some problems with using self signed certificate in openldap server. When I try to connect to remote LDAP server with SSL connection, ldap_sasl_bind_s return this error : "Can't contact LDAP server (-1) additional info: error:1416F086:SSL routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed (self signed certificate in certificate chain) " At the same time, server prints like this : 632973de conn=1018 fd=12 ACCEPT from IP=172.17.0.1:57250 (IP=0.0.0.0:636) TLS: can't accept: A TLS fatal alert has been received.. 632973de conn=1018 fd=12 closed (TLS negotiation failure) I use docker image to build an openldap server for test and made my own CA certificates, server's private key and certificate for TLS connection. On client program side, I set some options related to TLS connection. I set LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_REQUIRE_CERT to LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_NEVER, and set LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_CACERTDIR, LDAP_OPT_X_TLS_CACERTFILE to the path that server's CA certificate file is stored. I think I set all options that I can do on client side, but client always verify server's certificate and return "certificate verify failed (self signed certificate in certificate chain)" this error. It is okay to bind without TLS negotiation on client program. Also I made a connection with the server using LDAPAdmin which is windows ldap client program and it makes TLS connection successfully. Is there other option or some codes to be executed to make a secure connection using self signed certificate? I've been struggling with this error for a couple of weeks and not able to find a solution. Can I make a TLS connection with the server that uses the self-signed certificate?

1 0

[Issue 8912] incorrect rootDSE (namingContexts)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 15 Sep '22

15 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8912 --- Comment #8 from Cliff <cwheat(a)sterlingandzoe.info> --- Thank you for the reply and my apologies for the lack of clarity. Upon further testing, I was unable to reproduce the behavior using a command line application, ldapsearch. I should have done that before submitting the bug. If you have been assigned this issue then please close it. I hope this is more clear: When attempting to display all of the subordinate partitions in the root partition I was only able to see a portion. Those displayed results were all of the same naming context, relative DN c=* or o=*. There is some form of filtering done by the LDAPBrowser GUI. This does not happen using ldapsearch. The problem is not in slapd as I initially thought. Thanks again for your reply. --Cliff On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 12:44:54 PM EDT, <openldap-its(a)openldap.org> wrote: https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8912 --- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Cliff from comment #6) > On Fedora Core 36, > @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.6.2 (Aug 15 2022 00:00:00) $ > openldap > Included static backends: > config > ldif > monitor > mdb > using LDAP Browser\Editor v2.8.1: > > While attempting to add subordinate naming contexts off of base DN "" > (RootDSE), slapd will only show such subordinate naming contexts if they are > of the same RDN attribute. For instance, using all of FC36's trusted CA > certificates DN, which boil down to those based at c=?, or o=?, only those > of the same attribute will display as subordinates to "". I either get all > c= or o=, but not both. The subordinate naming context attribute that comes > in the configuration file determines which attribute will be shown. Hello, I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say here, but it seems thoroughly unrelated to this issue. If you feel that you've found an actual bug, then you should file something new with complete reproduction steps. If you're having issues understanding how to execute queries to OpenLDAP correctly please email the openldap-technical list. Regards, Quanah -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9339] New: Add syncrepl status in cn=monitor
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Sep '22

12 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9339 Issue ID: 9339 Summary: Add syncrepl status in cn=monitor Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Patch coming to expose some consumer state in cn=monitor Sample entry: # Consumer 001, database 2, databases, monitor dn: cn=Consumer 001,cn=database 2,cn=databases,cn=monitor objectClass: olmSyncReplInstance structuralObjectClass: olmSyncReplInstance cn: Consumer 001 creatorsName: modifiersName: createTimestamp: 20200906160447Z modifyTimestamp: 20200906160447Z olmSRProviderURIList: ldap://localhost:9011/ olmSRIsConnected: TRUE olmSRSyncPhase: Persist olmSRLastConnect: 20200906160448Z olmSRLastContact: 20200906160453Z olmSRLastCookieRcvd: rid=001,sid=001,csn=20200906160453.039573Z#000000#001#000 000 olmSRLastCookieSent: rid=001,sid=002,csn=20200906160447.723677Z#000000#001#000 000 entryDN: cn=Consumer 001,cn=database 2,cn=databases,cn=monitor subschemaSubentry: cn=Subschema hasSubordinates: FALSE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 9853] New: lastbind-precision conversion fails from slapd.conf to cn=config
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Sep '22

12 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9853 Issue ID: 9853 Summary: lastbind-precision conversion fails from slapd.conf to cn=config Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- When converting a slapd.conf file to cn=config, the "lastbind-precision" value is not preserved. slapd.conf: lastbind-precision 300 cn=config value: olcLastBindPrecision: 0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9437] New: Add OTP module to core
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Sep '22

12 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9437 Issue ID: 9437 Summary: Add OTP module to core Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Symas will contribute its OTP module for OpenLDAP 2.5 as a core overlay -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Issue 6035] slapd requires restart after modifying olcAuthzRegexp
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Sep '22

12 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6035 --- Comment #13 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- head: • f3ed13fa by Ondřej Kuzník at 2022-09-01T10:09:27+01:00 ITS#6035 Plug olcAuthIDRewrite cn=config leak RE26: • d598f537 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2022-09-12T20:43:29+00:00 ITS#6035 Plug olcAuthIDRewrite cn=config leak RE25: • 1b80eb42 by Ondřej Kuzník at 2022-09-12T20:43:41+00:00 ITS#6035 Plug olcAuthIDRewrite cn=config leak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9817] New: rwm overlay : Issue with DN containing special characters
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Sep '22

12 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9817 Issue ID: 9817 Summary: rwm overlay : Issue with DN containing special characters Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: thierry.pubellier(a)paris.fr Target Milestone: --- Hi, I'm using rwn to select the database useg for bind operations based on the result of a rewriteMap requets. Sample configuration in global section : #Rewrite Map to request a remote server rwm-rewriteMap ldap checkEntry "ldap://10.1.2.3/ou=users,dc=paris,dc=local?dn?sub" binddn="cn=myuser,ou=users,dc=paris,dc=local" credentials="XXX" # Backing up original DN rwm-rewriteRule ".+" "${&binddn($0)}$0" ":" # Contructing LDAP Filter for remote search. Combined with a rewrite Map, the requested DN is returned if there is a match. rwm-rewriteRule ".+" "(&(!(description=TEST))(distinguishedName=$0))" ":" # If filter matches, end of rewriting. Going to 'dc=paris,dc=local' database rwm-rewriteRule ".+" "${checkIfPasswordExpiredDN($0)}" ":@I" # Otherwise, restoring the original DN. rwm-rewriteRule ".+" "${*binddn}" ":" # And final DN massaging from "dc=paris,dc=local" to "dc=paris,dc=local2" database rwm-rewriteRule "(.+,)?ou=users,dc=paris,dc=local$" "$1ou=users,dc=paris,dc=local2" ":@" Everything goes fine until I use DN with special characters, like ',' or '['. For example : 'cn=Pubellier\, Thierry (TEST),ou=users,dc=paris,dc=local' In this case, the rwm-rewriteRule contructs a LDAP filter with incorrect syntax, as special caracters are not being escaped. I have to use some ugly tricks to escape these caracters, as shown below : #Rewrite Map to request a remote server rwm-rewriteMap ldap checkEntry "ldap://10.1.2.3/ou=users,dc=paris,dc=local?dn?sub" binddn="cn=myuser,ou=users,dc=paris,dc=local" credentials="XXX" # Backing up original DN rwm-rewriteRule ".+" "${&binddn($0)}$0" ":" # Rewriting for ',' rwm-rewriteRule "(.+).\2C(.+)" "$1\\,$2" # Adding a special '#' (asserting it in none of my DNs) suffix for special characters, in order to escape them without looping forever rwm-rewriteRule "(.*)([)*(\\])([^#].*|$)" "$1$2#$3" # Escaping of special characters with dedicated '#' suffix, avoiding infinite loops rwm-rewriteRule "(.*)([)*(\\])#(.*)" "$1\\$2$3" # Contructing LDAP Filter for remote search. Combined with a rewrite Map, the requested DN is returned if there is a match. rwm-rewriteRule ".+" "(&(!(description=TEST))(distinguishedName=$0))" ":" # If filter matches, end of rewriting. Going to 'dc=paris,dc=local' database rwm-rewriteRule ".+" "${checkIfPasswordExpiredDN($0)}" ":@I" # Otherwise, restoring the original DN. rwm-rewriteRule ".+" "${*binddn}" ":" # And final DN massaging from "dc=paris,dc=local" to "dc=paris,dc=local2" database rwm-rewriteRule "(.+,)?ou=users,dc=paris,dc=local$" "$1ou=users,dc=paris,dc=local2" ":@" Could there be a way to integrate the ldap escape mechanism when making an variable assignment (like using a '#' character in place of the usual '&') ? Thanks by advance, Best regards, Thierry -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 21

[Issue 9438] New: Add remoteauth overlay to core
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Sep '22

12 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9438 Issue ID: 9438 Summary: Add remoteauth overlay to core Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Symas will contribute its remoteauth overlay for OpenLDAP 2.5 as a core overlay -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 12

[Issue 8912] incorrect rootDSE (namingContexts)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Sep '22

12 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8912 --- Comment #7 from Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> --- (In reply to Cliff from comment #6) > On Fedora Core 36, > @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.6.2 (Aug 15 2022 00:00:00) $ > openldap > Included static backends: > config > ldif > monitor > mdb > using LDAP Browser\Editor v2.8.1: > > While attempting to add subordinate naming contexts off of base DN "" > (RootDSE), slapd will only show such subordinate naming contexts if they are > of the same RDN attribute. For instance, using all of FC36's trusted CA > certificates DN, which boil down to those based at c=?, or o=?, only those > of the same attribute will display as subordinates to "". I either get all > c= or o=, but not both. The subordinate naming context attribute that comes > in the configuration file determines which attribute will be shown. Hello, I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say here, but it seems thoroughly unrelated to this issue. If you feel that you've found an actual bug, then you should file something new with complete reproduction steps. If you're having issues understanding how to execute queries to OpenLDAP correctly please email the openldap-technical list. Regards, Quanah -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 8912] incorrect rootDSE (namingContexts)
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 09 Sep '22

09 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8912 --- Comment #6 from Cliff <cwheat(a)sterlingandzoe.info> --- On Fedora Core 36, @(#) $OpenLDAP: slapd 2.6.2 (Aug 15 2022 00:00:00) $ openldap Included static backends: config ldif monitor mdb using LDAP Browser\Editor v2.8.1: While attempting to add subordinate naming contexts off of base DN "" (RootDSE), slapd will only show such subordinate naming contexts if they are of the same RDN attribute. For instance, using all of FC36's trusted CA certificates DN, which boil down to those based at c=?, or o=?, only those of the same attribute will display as subordinates to "". I either get all c= or o=, but not both. The subordinate naming context attribute that comes in the configuration file determines which attribute will be shown. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9905] New: The test case 043 execution failed
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 05 Sep '22

05 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9905 Issue ID: 9905 Summary: The test case 043 execution failed Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1010881517(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- Test case 043 failed after I added #9823 pr to my openldap-2.6.0. Some logs may be useful to you. >>>>> Starting test043-delta-syncrepl for mdb... running defines.sh Starting provider slapd on TCP/IP port 9011... Using ldapsearch to check that provider slapd is running... Using ldapadd to create the context prefix entries in the provider... Starting consumer slapd on TCP/IP port 9012... Using ldapsearch to check that consumer slapd is running... Using ldapadd to populate the provider directory... Waiting 7 seconds for syncrepl to receive changes... Stopping the provider, sleeping 10 seconds and restarting it... Using ldapsearch to check that provider slapd is running... Using ldapmodify to modify provider directory... Waiting 7 seconds for syncrepl to receive changes... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the provider... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the consumer... Filtering provider results... Filtering consumer results... Comparing retrieved entries from provider and consumer... Stopping consumer to test recovery... Modifying more entries on the provider... Restarting consumer... Waiting 7 seconds for syncrepl to receive changes... Try updating the consumer slapd... Waiting 7 seconds for syncrepl to receive changes... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the provider... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the consumer... Filtering provider results... Filtering consumer results... Comparing retrieved entries from provider and consumer... Stopping consumer to test recovery after logpurge expired... Modifying even more entries on the provider... Configuring logpurge of 1 second... Waiting 4 seconds for accesslog to be purged... Using ldapsearch to check if accesslog is empty... Restarting consumer... Waiting 7 seconds for syncrepl to receive changes... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the provider... Using ldapsearch to read all the entries from the consumer... Filtering provider results... Filtering consumer results... Comparing retrieved entries from provider and consumer... test failed - provider and consumer databases differ >>>>> Failed test043-delta-syncrepl for mdb after 0 seconds (exit 1) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 9358] New: back-mdb may return accesslog entries out of order
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9358 Issue ID: 9358 Summary: back-mdb may return accesslog entries out of order Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.53 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- back-mdb will usually return search entries in entryID order, but may do a dn traversal instead if the count of children is smaller than the count of search filter candidates. The RDNs are sorted in length order, not lexical order. For accesslog, all RDNs are of equal length but if they have trailing zeroes, the generalizedTime normalizer truncates them. Changing their lengths causes accesslog's timestamp-based RDNs to sort in the wrong order. The least intrusive fix is to override the syntax/normalizer for reqStart and reqEnd attributes to not truncate trailing zeroes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 8064] SIGSEGV in monitor-shutdown code
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 01 Sep '22

01 Sep '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8064 Ondřej Kuzník <ondra(a)mistotebe.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=9906 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9903] New: Broken link and images in Powered By page
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Aug '22

31 Aug '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9903 Issue ID: 9903 Summary: Broken link and images in Powered By page Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: jkirkwood(a)kclinfo.com Target Milestone: --- In the page https://www.openldap.org/powered.html (linked from the phrase 'This site is powered by open source software.' at the bottom of the home page) 1) the link to 'Website Meta Language' is broken - it may have moved to https://thewml.github.io ? 2) the links to the logo images are broken - https://www.openldap.org/icons/logo/wml.gif - https://www.openldap.org/icons/logo/freebsd.gif - https://www.openldap.org/icons/logo/apache.gif I randomly noticed this - not breaking anything I'm aware of, so possibly only a cosmetic issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9516] New: Argon2 configuration parameters with slappasswd
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 23 Aug '22

23 Aug '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9516 Issue ID: 9516 Summary: Argon2 configuration parameters with slappasswd Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.58 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: gilbert.kowarzyk(a)servicenow.com Target Milestone: --- It is currently possible to generate an Argon2 hash using slappasswd as follows: slappasswd -h {ARGON2} -o module-load=pw-argon2 However, I believe that it is currently not possible to provide Argon2 configuration values for parameters "m", "t", and "p" when using slappasswd. If it is currently possible to provide these config parameters when using slappasswd, please add documentation for how to do so. Thanks in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 7

[Issue 9889] New: Error while installation Openldap 2.5.9
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 16 Aug '22

16 Aug '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9889 Issue ID: 9889 Summary: Error while installation Openldap 2.5.9 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.9 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: vmaidarkar(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hi Team, While installing OpenLDAP v2.5.9 we are getting following error "Clould not locate TLS/SSL package. Error:- checking openssl/ssl.h usability... no checking openssl/ssl.h presence... no checking for openssl/ssl.h... no configure:error: Could not locate TLS/SSL package Kindly suggest to resolve this issue. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 9891] New: The test case execution time is too long.
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 08 Aug '22

08 Aug '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9891 Issue ID: 9891 Summary: The test case execution time is too long. Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: 1010881517(a)qq.com Target Milestone: --- OpenLDAP test cases use a large amount of sleep. As a result, it takes a long time to execute all test cases. Is there any way to shorten the time? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

2 8

[Issue 9896] New: Error: Could not locate TLS/SSL package
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 08 Aug '22

08 Aug '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9896 Issue ID: 9896 Summary: Error: Could not locate TLS/SSL package Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.13 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: vmaidarkar(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 909 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=909&action=edit Error: Could not locate TLS/SSL package Hi Team, I'm getting the below error while installing OpenLDAP 2.5.13 on CentOS 7.9 & OpenSSL 1.1.1g & attaching config.log file. checking for openssl/ssl.h... yes checking for SSL_export_keying_material_early in -lssl... no configure: error: Could not locate TLS/SSL package Kindly suggest how to fix this issue. Thanks, Vijay -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 9893] New: Unable to create ldap object with same unique value as deleted object
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 08 Aug '22

08 Aug '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9893 Issue ID: 9893 Summary: Unable to create ldap object with same unique value as deleted object Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.3 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: curtis.ruck+github(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- I have a unique overlay that is trying to ensure uniqueness of two attributes, mail and uid. My configdir config for my mdb database: dn: olcOverlay={1}unique objectClass: olcUniqueConfig objectClass: olcOverlayConfig olcOverlay: unique olcUniqueURI: ldap://?mail?sub olcUniqueURI: ldap://?uid?sub structuralObjectClass: olcUniqueConfig If I delete a user, and then go to recreate it, I get this error: msgtype 105, error 19, constraint violation non-unique attributes found with (|(uid=jdoe)(givenName=John)(sn=Doe)(cn=John Doe)(mail=john(a)example.com)(userPassword=<password>)(objectClass=inetOrgPerson)) Somehow I believe the unique index structure is broken. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 9890] New: Core is seen while reboot for RHEL_8_4_X86_64
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 03 Aug '22

03 Aug '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9890 Issue ID: 9890 Summary: Core is seen while reboot for RHEL_8_4_X86_64 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.59 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: sunil.ece.126(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hi, I am seeing below core while using openLdap 2.4.59. We are using openLdap in our application as stack to initiate the connection towards ldapServer. Current I am using RHEL_8_4_X86_64. Core is seen whenever system is going for reboot. Let me know if more information is required. (gdb) bt #0 0x00007ff94be7d998 in vtable for {}cxxabiv1::{_}_si_class_type_info () from /lib64/libstdc++.so.6 #1 0x00007ff9520296cc in ManagedObjectList* ManagedObject::findMOListByKey<MOID>(MOID const&) const () from /usr/IMS/current/bin/libMX.so.0 #2 0x00007ff9520287a5 in ManagedObject::findObjectById(MOID const&) const () from /usr/IMS/current/bin/libMX.so.0 #3 0x00007ff952029fa9 in SignalInstaller::signalAction(int, siginfo_t*, void*) () from /usr/IMS/current/bin/libMX.so.0 #4 <signal handler called> #5 memfence_check (ptr=0x7fffffff00000000, size=0x0) at src/tcmalloc.cc:294 #6 0x00007ff94c72f90d in memfence_check_and_free (ptr=<optimized out>, size=size@entry=0x0) at src/tcmalloc.cc:307 #7 0x00007ff94c73dfe4 in free_fast_path (ptr=<optimized out>) at src/tcmalloc.cc:2142 #8 tc_free (ptr=<optimized out>) at src/tcmalloc.cc:2149 #9 0x00007ff949d3b0ce in ldap_int_destroy_global_options () from /lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2 #10 0x00007ff9528cfc96 in _dl_fini () from /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 #11 0x00007ff94b1d0b0c in __run_exit_handlers () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #12 0x00007ff94b1d0c40 in exit () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #13 0x00007ff94b1ba49a in __libc_start_main () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #14 0x0000000000427b6e in _start () -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9884] New: Document "set" patterns in ACLs
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 25 Jul '22

25 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9884 Issue ID: 9884 Summary: Document "set" patterns in ACLs Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The slapd.access(5) man page has this exceptionally unhelpful line where sets are concerned: "The statement set=<pattern> is undocumented yet." Even if it is an experimental feature, it should still be documented on how it is meant to operate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 9885] New: Error while compilation of Openldap 2.5.9
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 22 Jul '22

22 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9885 Issue ID: 9885 Summary: Error while compilation of Openldap 2.5.9 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.9 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: rekha.shivsan(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 908 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=908&action=edit Error while compilation Hi, We are trying to install Openldap v2.5.9. While running the make command we are seeing below error. ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_meth_set_read' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_get_data' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_meth_set_write' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `OPENSSL_sk_value' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_meth_set_ctrl' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `OPENSSL_sk_new_null' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_meth_set_gets' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_meth_set_create' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_set_ciphersuites' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_meth_set_puts' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_meth_free' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_meth_new' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `OPENSSL_sk_push' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `EVP_MD_CTX_new' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `X509_NAME_get0_der' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_set_init' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `OPENSSL_sk_num' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_up_ref' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `OPENSSL_init_ssl' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `ASN1_STRING_get0_data' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `TLS_method' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `EVP_MD_CTX_free' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_set_options' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `SSL_set_ciphersuites' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_meth_set_destroy' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `SSL_session_reused' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `X509_get_X509_PUBKEY' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `OPENSSL_sk_free' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `BIO_set_data' ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to `SSL_CTX_clear_options' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Complete error logs are attached " OpenLdap 2.5.9_error.txt". Could you please help to resolve this issue. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 9873] New: idle timeout by backends close connections
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Jul '22

18 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9873 Issue ID: 9873 Summary: idle timeout by backends close connections Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ettorevi(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Hi, making searches through lloadd to a bunch of backends returns weird results Sometimes I get: | ldap_bind: Other (e.g., implementation specific) error (80) | additional info: connection to the remote server has been severed Others ldap_result: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) due to an idle_timeout from the backend in the middle of the search, in a non deterministic way. If I search directly on the backends everything works ldapsearch -x -Hldaps://lloadd.server 'objectClass=*' -w pwd [...] # numResponses: 9620 # numEntries: 9620 ldap_result: Can't contact LDAP server (-1) lloadd compiled standalone from 2.6.2 with: --enable-balancer=yes --enable-syslog --enable-debug --enable-slapd=no Backends are older, 2.4.49+dfsg-2ubuntu1.9 from Ubuntu 20.04 Any hints? Thank you -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9849] New: Update website to support LTS and Feature releases
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9849 Issue ID: 9849 Summary: Update website to support LTS and Feature releases Product: website Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: website Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: mnormann(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Modify .wlmrc variable names and website content to handle both Feature Release and Long Term Support release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9846] New: Provide ppm v2.2
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9846 Issue ID: 9846 Summary: Provide ppm v2.2 Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: david.coutadeur(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Provide the new release of ppm: v2.2: - implement a maximum number of characters for each class #18 - upgrade documentation for new olcPPolicyCheckModule in OpenLDAP 2.6 #30 - Make one unique code of development for 2.5 and 2.6 OpenLDAP versions #35 - fix segmentation fault in ppm_test #36 - various minor fixes and optimizations See: https://github.com/ltb-project/ppm/milestone/5 I am going to propose a MR soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 9856] New: Lloadd doesn't tag Notice of Disconnection responseName
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9856 Issue ID: 9856 Summary: Lloadd doesn't tag Notice of Disconnection responseName Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: lloadd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- The responseName field in Notice of Disconnection is being tagged as a generic octet string, where RFC4511 marks it with "responseValue [11] OCTET STRING OPTIONAL". Fix is coming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9858] New: cn=config replication refresh breaks mdb database
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9858 Issue ID: 9858 Summary: cn=config replication refresh breaks mdb database Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- working in an environment with the following layout: Config node -> This node contains the cn=config databases for consumers in one tree and providers in another tree. provider nodes -> Pull their configuration from the config node via standard syncrepl consumer nodes -> Pull their configuration from the config node via standard syncrepl This worked fine with OpenLDAP 2.4. With 2.6, using the same cn=config configuration, slapd will segfault if the cn=config db is put through a REFRESH sequence. I've ruled out syncprov as an issue as I removed the syncprov configuration from the consumer nodes entirely and it still occurs (I was thinking perhaps it was the syncprov checkpoint at shutdown). At this point I can reproduce this trivially 100% of the time simply by having a node REFRESH cn=config. Once the REFRESH has occurred, slapd will continue running. However the next time it is stopped/started it will SEGV on startup. It is usually possible to use slapcat to extract the MDB database and rebuild it, at which point slapd will start again. A couple of times I was only able to extract a portion of the database using slapcat (70MB of 650MB). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 19

[Issue 9855] New: Implement a module to enable case-insensitive Boolean values
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9855 Issue ID: 9855 Summary: Implement a module to enable case-insensitive Boolean values Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- The module, when loaded from slapd.conf, will allow for values such as true, false and True, False, to be accepted by the server -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9850] New: slapd-watcher ignores sids when only 1 server is specified
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9850 Issue ID: 9850 Summary: slapd-watcher ignores sids when only 1 server is specified Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- When only 1 URL is provided, it always uses only a contextCSN with sid=0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 7165] Killing slap tools breaks the running mdb
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7165 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9865] New: slapd-watcher: support for glue
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9865 Issue ID: 9865 Summary: slapd-watcher: support for glue Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: enhancement Priority: --- Component: client tools Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- When operating on glued backends, the DB where entry counts need to be monitored may be different from where the contextCSN updates occur. Add a "-c" option to allow specifying the contextCSN baseDN, separate from the main "-b" baseDN. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9872] New: slapd-ldap(5) man page missing bold tag on authz parameter
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9872 Issue ID: 9872 Summary: slapd-ldap(5) man page missing bold tag on authz parameter Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The slapd-ldap(5) man page is missing a bold tag on the authz configuration parameter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9864] New: One-time leaks in accesslog
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9864 Issue ID: 9864 Summary: One-time leaks in accesslog Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: minor Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- In tool mode, the accesslog's configured logdb suffix isn't freed. It's normally freed by the db_open handler but in tool mode the overlay never actually gets opened. Also due to 414866b8889 ITS#9580, li_sids can leak when replacing mincsn. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 8882] Empty Directory String Overlay
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8882 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |VERIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9867] New: syncprov leak on early Abandons
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9867 Issue ID: 9867 Summary: syncprov leak on early Abandons Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- The baseDN found by syncprov_findbase() can be leaked if an Abandon or error occurs early during psearch processing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9871] New: bind operations on relay entries cause slapd to segfault with rwm and ppolicy enabled
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9871 Issue ID: 9871 Summary: bind operations on relay entries cause slapd to segfault with rwm and ppolicy enabled Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: subbarao(a)computer.org Target Milestone: --- On 2.5.12, slapd crashes during bind operations on relay entries with rwm and ppolicy both enabled. A simple way to reproduce this issue is to edit tests/scripts/relay and tests/data/slapd-relay.conf as follows, and then run test030-relay. I think this issue is the same as ITS#7966 reported in 2014. --- tests/scripts/relay.orig 2022-05-04 07:57:30.000000000 -0700 +++ tests/scripts/relay 2022-06-23 17:16:42.020652093 -0700 @@ -356,6 +356,16 @@ exit 1 fi +$LDAPADD -D "$MANAGERDN" -H $URI1 -w $PASSWD <<EOF > /dev/null 2>&1 +dn: cn=ppolicy,dc=example,dc=com +objectClass: top +objectClass: device +objectClass: pwdPolicy +cn: ppolicy +pwdMinLength: 5 +pwdAttribute: userPassword +EOF + BASEDN="o=Example,c=US" echo "Changing password to database \"$BASEDN\"..." $LDAPPASSWD -H $URI1 -D "cn=Manager,$BASEDN" -w $PASSWD \ --- tests/data/slapd-relay.conf.orig 2022-05-04 07:57:30.000000000 -0700 +++ tests/data/slapd-relay.conf 2022-06-23 16:57:15.184456120 -0700 @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ #metamod#moduleload back_meta.la #rwmmod#modulepath ../servers/slapd/overlays/ #rwmmod#moduleload rwm.la +#ppolicymod#modulepath ../servers/slapd/overlays/ +#ppolicymod#moduleload ppolicy.la ####################################################################### # database definitions @@ -46,6 +48,9 @@ #ndb#dbname db_1 #ndb#include @DATADIR@/ndb.conf +overlay ppolicy +ppolicy_default cn=ppolicy,dc=example,dc=com + database @RELAY@ suffix "o=Example,c=US" ### back-relay can automatically instantiate the rwm overlay -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 9876] New: Coverity report on OpenLDAP libraries and client tools
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9876 Issue ID: 9876 Summary: Coverity report on OpenLDAP libraries and client tools Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: simon.pichugin(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 906 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=906&action=edit Covscan report for OpenLDAP 2.6.2 I've got a report from our Coverity Scan system. It had a lot of false positives so I've filtered it a bit. Please, find below the report with only RESOURCE_LEAK, LOCK, and MISSING_LOCK issues. I think there are still some false positives left, but I hope it's worth checking by core OpenLDAP developers. The report: https://spichugi.fedorapeople.org/openldap-covscan-2.6.2.html Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 9866] New: delta-sync memleak on Adds
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9866 Issue ID: 9866 Summary: delta-sync memleak on Adds Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Due to the entry->e_name massaging in back-mdb/add.c (ITS#5326) syncrepl wasn't freeing the non-normalized DN as expected after add finished. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

[Issue 9840] New: Fix parallel build failures
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9840 Issue ID: 9840 Summary: Fix parallel build failures Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.9 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: yi.zhao(a)windriver.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 899 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=899&action=edit 0001-ldif-filter-fix-parallel-build-failure.patch I found there are two parallel build errors for ldif-filter and libraries: ldif-filter: ld: cannot find slapd-common.o: No such file or directory libraries: ../../build/shtool mkdir -p TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/cortexa15t2hf-neon-wrs-linux-gnueabi/openldap/2.5.9-r0/image/usr/lib mkdir: cannot create directory 'TOPDIR/tmp-glibc/work/cortexa15t2hf-neon-wrs-linux-gnueabi/openldap/2.5.9-r0/image/usr/lib': File exists make[1]: *** [Makefile:288: install-local] Error 1 I have attached 2 patches to fix these issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9824] New: getting/setting LDAP_OPT_X_SASL_ options require call to ldap_initialize
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9824 Issue ID: 9824 Summary: getting/setting LDAP_OPT_X_SASL_ options require call to ldap_initialize Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: jay.hendren(a)colorado.edu Target Milestone: --- Originally filed against python-ldap: https://github.com/python-ldap/python-ldap/issues/468 Per "man 3 ldap_get_option", some options can be set globally while others require an initialized LDAP struct: > These routines provide access to options stored either in a LDAP handle or as global options, where applicable. However, "where applicable" doesn't seem to have any further clarification. In particular, getting or setting any of the "LDAP_OPT_X_SASL_" options appears to require an initialized LDAP struct, as noted in the bug report against python-ldap, whereas most other options do not appear to share this requirement. I cannot find this fact documented anywhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9841] New: Build failure on musl due to conflicting declarations of ber_calloc
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9841 Issue ID: 9841 Summary: Build failure on musl due to conflicting declarations of ber_calloc Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.11 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: helmut(a)subdivi.de Target Milestone: --- This is a forward of a Debian bug at https://bugs.debian.org/1008951 and a Gentoo bug at https://bugs.gentoo.org/546556. In essence, openldap #defines calloc ber_calloc and then #includes some system headers, which happen to #include <sched.h>. musl's <sched.h> happens to delcare calloc when _GNU_SOURCE is #defined. Since this is the case, musl's declaration is diverted to ber_calloc and since one parameter has a subtly different type, the declarations cause a conflict. I think this is actually two bugs. 1. musl should not declare calloc in <sched.h>. Doing so also breaks libgccjit (citation needed). 2. openldap should not #define calloc before #including system headers. Fixing either fixes the build failure. I think we should fix both. The openldap side can be fixed by reordering the #define and the relevant #include. You can find a working patch in the Debian bug above at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=1008951;filename=mu…. Does this look acceptable for inclusion into openldap? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9882] New: slapd crashes when lastbind enabled w/ multi-provider
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9882 Issue ID: 9882 Summary: slapd crashes when lastbind enabled w/ multi-provider Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: smckinney(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 907 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=907&action=edit slapd.conf Description: Crash during bind operation when lastbind's enabled in a multi-provider env. Built from source: commit 23ef018c6f321413141f26ed6e1909f85047ba76 (HEAD -> OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_6, origin/OPENLDAP_REL_ENG_2_6) Configuration: attached System: AlmaLinux8 Backtrace: Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. #0 0x00000000004dfe66 in over_op_func (op=0x7d6b1fffe690, rs=0x7d6b1fffe620, which=op_modify) at backover.c:749 749 on = oi->oi_list; [Current thread is 1 (Thread 0x7d6b1ffff700 (LWP 96272))] Missing separate debuginfos, use: yum debuginfo-install cyrus-sasl-lib-2.1.27-6.el8_5.x86_64 glibc-2.28-189.5.el8_6.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.5.10-9.el8.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.18.2-14.el8.x86_64 libblkid-2.32.1-35.el8.x86_64 libcap-2.48-2.el8.x86_64 libcom_err-1.45.6-4.el8.x86_64 libdb-5.3.28-42.el8_4.x86_64 libgcc-8.5.0-10.1.el8_6.alma.x86_64 libmount-2.32.1-35.el8.x86_64 libselinux-2.9-5.el8.x86_64 libtool-ltdl-2.4.6-25.el8.x86_64 libuuid-2.32.1-35.el8.x86_64 libxcrypt-4.1.1-6.el8.x86_64 openssl-libs-1.1.1k-6.el8_5.x86_64 pcre2-10.32-2.el8.x86_64 systemd-libs-239-58.el8.x86_64 zlib-1.2.11-18.el8_5.x86_64 (gdb) bt #0 0x00000000004dfe66 in over_op_func (op=0x7d6b1fffe690, rs=0x7d6b1fffe620, which=op_modify) at backover.c:749 #1 0x00000000004e0135 in over_op_modify (op=0x7d6b1fffe690, rs=0x7d6b1fffe620) at backover.c:808 #2 0x000000000046d785 in fe_op_lastbind (op=0x7d6b1010ed40) at bind.c:503 #3 0x000000000046da7f in fe_op_bind_success (op=0x7d6b1010ed40, rs=0x7d6b1fffe960) at bind.c:548 #4 0x000000000046d1e1 in fe_op_bind (op=0x7d6b1010ed40, rs=0x7d6b1fffe960) at bind.c:386 #5 0x000000000046c8cd in do_bind (op=0x7d6b1010ed40, rs=0x7d6b1fffe960) at bind.c:206 #6 0x000000000044427d in connection_operation (ctx=0x7d6b1fffea90, arg_v=0x7d6b1010ed40) at connection.c:1115 #7 0x000000000044488f in connection_read_thread (ctx=0x7d6b1fffea90, argv=0x16) at connection.c:1267 #8 0x00007f5f2d60a470 in ldap_int_thread_pool_wrapper (xpool=0xc79d80) at tpool.c:1053 #9 0x00007f5f2c1a51cf in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #10 0x00007f5f2be11dd3 in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 9847] New: kqueue problem with OpenBSD
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9847 Issue ID: 9847 Summary: kqueue problem with OpenBSD Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: All OS: Other Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: stu(a)spacehopper.org Target Milestone: --- The kqueue support added to slapd for 2.5 isn't working correctly on OpenBSD. If slapd runs as a daemon, errors like these are seen: slap_client_connect: URI=ldaps://XXX Warning, ldap_start_tls failed (1) mdb_opinfo_get: err Invalid argument(22) However if slapd is run in the foreground with -d, things are ok. They are also OK if kqueue is disabled (by neutering the autoconf check). I've tested 2.5.4, 2.5.9 and 2.6.2. Here are some log excerpts: 17:23:44.692: slapd starting 17:23:44.692: daemon: added 3r listener=0x0 17:23:44.692: daemon: added 6r listener=0x100263797200 17:23:44.692: daemon: added 7r listener=0x100263785400 17:23:44.692: daemon: kqueue: listen=6 active_threads=0 tvp=zero 17:23:44.692: daemon: kqueue: listen=7 active_threads=0 tvp=zero 17:23:44.692: daemon: activity on 1 descriptor 17:23:44.692: daemon: activity on: 17:23:44.692: 17:23:44.692: daemon: kqueue: listen=6 active_threads=0 tvp=zero 17:23:44.692: daemon: kqueue: listen=7 active_threads=0 tvp=zero 17:23:44.692: >>> dnNormalize: <cn=Consumer 101> 17:23:44.692: <<< dnNormalize: <cn=consumer 101> 17:23:44.692: =>do_syncrepl rid=101 17:23:44.763: slap_client_connect: URI=ldaps://XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Warning, ldap_start_tls failed (1) 17:23:44.781: => mdb_entry_get: ndn: "dc=XXXXXXX,dc=XXX" 17:23:44.782: => mdb_entry_get: oc: "(null)", at: "contextCSN" 17:23:44.782: mdb_opinfo_get: err Invalid argument(22) 17:23:44.782: =>do_syncrep2 rid=101 17:23:44.782: daemon: added 9r listener=0x0 17:23:44.783: daemon: activity on 1 descriptor 17:23:44.783: daemon: activity on: 17:23:44.783: 17:23:44.783: daemon: kqueue: listen=6 active_threads=0 tvp=NULL 17:23:44.783: daemon: kqueue: listen=7 active_threads=0 tvp=NULL 17:23:44.800: daemon: activity on 1 descriptor 17:23:44.800: daemon: activity on: 17:23:44.800: 9r 17:23:44.800: 17:23:44.800: daemon: read active on 9 17:23:44.800: daemon: kqueue: listen=6 active_threads=0 tvp=NULL 17:23:44.800: daemon: kqueue: listen=7 active_threads=0 tvp=NULL 17:23:44.800: connection_get(9) 17:23:44.800: connection_get(9): got connid=0 17:23:44.801: =>do_syncrepl rid=101 17:23:44.801: =>do_syncrep2 rid=101 Not sure if it's any help but looking at kdump(1) output after a run under ktrace(1) I didn't spot the immediate problem resulting in "ldap_start_tls failed (1)" however the "mdb_opinfo_get: err Invalid argument(22)" occurs after attempting to call fcntl with F_SETLK on the fd 5 which is the kqueue fd: 65304 slapd RET write 97/0x61 65304 slapd CALL poll(0x89d39cb9004,1,INFTIM) 65304 slapd STRU struct kevent [2] { ident=9, filter=EVFILT_READ, flags=0x1005<EV_ADD|EV_ENABLE>, fflags=0<>, data=0, udata=0x231a1bea } { ident=9, filter=EVFILT_EXCEPT, flags=0x1005<EV_ADD|EV_ENABLE>, fflags=0x4<>, data=0, udata=0x231a1bea } 65304 slapd STRU struct kevent { ident=9, filter=EVFILT_READ, flags=0x1005<EV_ADD|EV_ENABLE>, fflags=0<>, data=36, udata=0x231a1bea } 65304 slapd STRU struct pollfd { fd=9, events=0x3<POLLIN|POLLPRI>, revents=0x1<POLLIN> } 65304 slapd RET poll 1 65304 slapd CALL read(9,0x89ccfb103e0,0x5) 65304 slapd GIO fd 9 read 5 bytes "\^W\^C\^C\0\^_" 65304 slapd RET read 5 65304 slapd CALL read(9,0x89ccfb349c5,0x1f) 65304 slapd GIO fd 9 read 31 bytes "\M^W\M-r\M-f\M^C\M-2\M^V\M-E\^O\M-hdgq\M-"\M-o\M-&\M^[*\M-9\M^E\M-Sd\M^A2\M-QE\M-cb |\M^VI" 65304 slapd RET read 31/0x1f 65304 slapd CALL mmap(0,0x2000,0x3<PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE>,0x1002<MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANON>,-1,0) 65304 slapd RET mmap 9468564512768/0x89c926ca000 65304 slapd CALL fcntl(5,F_SETLK,0x8ef465d0) 65304 slapd RET fcntl -1 errno 22 Invalid argument 65304 slapd CALL getpid() 65304 slapd RET getpid 65304/0xff18 65304 slapd CALL sendsyslog(0x89c8ef44040,59,0<>) 65304 slapd GIO fd -1 wrote 59 bytes "<167>slapd[65304]: mdb_opinfo_get: err Invalid argument(22)" Any suggestions or requests for further information/tests would be welcome. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 16

[Issue 9868] New: backglue and syncprov must use same pending_csn_list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9868 Issue ID: 9868 Summary: backglue and syncprov must use same pending_csn_list Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.12 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- When replication is performed on a glued DB hierarchy the syncprov overlay must only be configured on the top DB. But when writes occur on a subDB their CSNs will be queued on the subDB's be_pending_csn_list. When syncprov sees these writes it will try to graduate these CSNs from the top DB's be_pending_csn_list, but never find them there. The CSN list will grow without bound. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9726] New: Admin guide and man pages need better documentation on disabling syslog
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9726 Issue ID: 9726 Summary: Admin guide and man pages need better documentation on disabling syslog Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- 2.6.0 added the new feature allowing using a logfile for all debug/loglevel messages and bypassing syslog entirely. However, there is no documentation on the new settings or examples of how to do this in the admin guide, and the man page sections on the new parameters for the logfile side do not note at when/how they enable bypassing syslog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 30

[Issue 9883] New: OpenLDAP version 2.4.44 for CentoOS 7.9 contains several CVEs
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jul '22

12 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9883 Issue ID: 9883 Summary: OpenLDAP version 2.4.44 for CentoOS 7.9 contains several CVEs Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.44 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: meirav.rath(a)imperva.com Target Milestone: --- Hello, My name is Meirav Rath, I'm a software developer and security champion at Imperva. As part of our effort to map security risks in our products I've been scanning our 3rd party rpms for vulnerabilities. It looks like OpenLDAP version 2.4.44 for CentOS 7.9 has the following security issues: 1. CVE-2020-36229 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36229 2. CVE-2019-13565 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-13565 3. CVE-2020-36223 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36223 4. CVE-2020-36222 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36222 5. CVE-2019-13057 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-13057 6. CVE-2021-27212 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27212 7. CVE-2020-36226 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36226 8. CVE-2020-36228 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36228 9. CVE-2022-29155 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-29155 10. CVE-2020-36230 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36230 11. CVE-2020-36225 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36225 12. CVE-2020-36227 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36227 13. CVE-2020-36224 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36224 14. CVE-2020-36221 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-36221 When can we expect an updated RPM with fixes for this issues, aimed for CentOS7.9? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 2

[Issue 9782] New: regression test its8752 failure
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 08 Jul '22

08 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9782 Issue ID: 9782 Summary: regression test its8752 failure Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- If a contextCSN update (new cookie) goes from server A through server B to server C, server C will use that CSN to update entryCSN as well (which neither A nor B did). This fails the initial replication check. The issue has likely existed since deltasync was made possible, a version of this is confirmed at least in 2.4.60 onwards to current master. In principle, it is related to concerns raised in ITS#9580. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 8752] MMR delta-sync deadlock using slapd.conf
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 08 Jul '22

08 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8752 Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah(a)openldap.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.openldap.org/s | |how_bug.cgi?id=9782 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 0

[Issue 9879] New: Crash in bindconf_free
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Jul '22

07 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9879 Issue ID: 9879 Summary: Crash in bindconf_free Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.6.2 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: dpa-openldap(a)aegee.org Target Milestone: --- Slapd 2.6 (git commit 0dc9ff2594da) produes at start this output: free(): invalid pointer . The core-dump is: gdb /git/openldap bt f #0 __pthread_kill_internal (signo=6, threadid=<optimized out>) at pthread_kill.c:45 pid = 3060261 tid = 3060261 pd = <optimized out> val = 0 tid = <optimized out> pd = <optimized out> val = <optimized out> sc_ret = <optimized out> resultvar = <optimized out> __x = <optimized out> pid = <optimized out> resultvar = <optimized out> __arg3 = <optimized out> __arg2 = <optimized out> __arg1 = <optimized out> _a3 = <optimized out> _a2 = <optimized out> _a1 = <optimized out> #1 __GI___pthread_kill (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6) at pthread_kill.c:62 No locals. #2 0x00007ff2445a91f2 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26 ret = <optimized out> #3 0x00007ff24459443b in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79 save_stage = 1 act = { __sigaction_handler = { sa_handler = 0x7ff244e0b590, sa_sigaction = 0x7ff244e0b590 }, sa_mask = { __val = {140678513857256, 140678514176000, 0, 4360521566522441729, 4294967295, 17981341232831397889, 140678513857472, 140678514176000, 140678513858576, 140678514161728, 37835024, 140678514167232, 5433280, 140727718055568, 140727718055515, 140678514247725} }, sa_flags = 1, sa_restorer = 0x0 } sigs = { __val = {32, 1, 140678501620784, 1, 0, 1, 140678514176000, 1, 140678501620784, 140678514176000, 140678514176880, 0, 140678514389536, 1, 140677358813185, 4294967295} } #4 0x00007ff2445e7c00 in __libc_message (action=action@entry=do_abort, fmt=fmt@entry=0x7ff2447185f4 "%s\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:155 ap = {{ gp_offset = 24, fp_offset = 0, overflow_arg_area = 0x7ffdb9a4f2e0, reg_save_area = 0x7ffdb9a4f270 }} [31/1957] fd = <optimized out> list = <optimized out> nlist = <optimized out> cp = <optimized out> #5 0x00007ff2445fc64a in malloc_printerr (str=str@entry=0x7ff244716247 "free(): invalid pointer") at malloc.c:5543 No locals. #6 0x00007ff2445fddbc in _int_free (av=<optimized out>, p=<optimized out>, have_lock=0) at malloc.c:4326 size = 0 fb = <optimized out> nextchunk = <optimized out> nextsize = <optimized out> nextinuse = <optimized out> prevsize = <optimized out> bck = <optimized out> fwd = <optimized out> __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = "_int_free" #7 0x00007ff244600821 in __GI___libc_free (mem=<optimized out>) at malloc.c:3278 ar_ptr = <optimized out> p = <optimized out> err = 13 #8 0x000000000041ab72 in bindconf_free (bc=bc@entry=0x52b970 <ldifocs+48>) at config.c:1611 No locals. #9 0x000000000046b908 in syncinfo_free (sie=0x52b940 <ldifocs>, free_all=free_all@entry=1) at syncrepl.c:6052 si_next = 0x4d8530 #10 0x0000000000429815 in backend_destroy_one (bd=0x52d8f0 <cfBackInfo+16>, dynamic=0) at backend.c:456 No locals. #11 0x000000000041651a in config_back_db_destroy (be=<optimized out>, cr=<optimized out>) at bconfig.c:7610 cfb = 0x52d8e0 <cfBackInfo> #12 0x000000000042981d in backend_destroy_one (bd=0x2445920, dynamic=1) at backend.c:459 No locals. #13 0x000000000042993a in backend_destroy () at backend.c:498 bd = <optimized out> bi = <optimized out> #14 0x000000000043e04f in slap_destroy () at init.c:258 rc = <optimized out> #15 0x000000000040a12c in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=0x7ffdb9a4f628) at main.c:890 i = <optimized out> no_detach = <optimized out> rc = 1 urls = 0x7ffdb9a50e90 "ldap://ldap.aegee.org/ ldaps://ldap.aegee.org ldapi://%2Fvar%2Frun%2Fldapi" username = 0x7ffdb9a50e60 "openldap" groupname = 0x0 sandbox = 0x7ffdb9a50e6c "/home/openldap" pid = <optimized out> waitfds = {38815280, 0} g_argc = <optimized out> g_argv = 0x7ffdb9a4f628 configfile = 0x0 configdir = 0x7ffdb9a50e7e "/etc/openldap/" serverMode = 1 scp = <optimized out> scp_entry = <optimized out> serverNamePrefix = <synthetic pointer> l = <optimized out> slapd_pid_file_unlink = <optimized out> slapd_args_file_unlink = <optimized out> firstopt = <optimized out> Going back to commit 2cf617938 does work fine. To be precise, openldap reads certificates from its chrooted file - chr/etc/openssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt , but it had no read-access to the chr/etc/openssl/certs directory. At commit 2cf617938 does not crash at the latest 2.6 it crashes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs