https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9870
Issue ID: 9870
Summary: Remove optional overlay syntax
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
While the module/overlay support was really young, an unreleased version of
OpenLDAP supported 'optional overlays' that could fail start up without that
being treated as a fatal error.
This was later disabled, never documented and nowadays it can't work anyway,
but the configuration option is still there in config_overlay() honouring
overlay names starting with the '-' character as an alias. A patch to remove
that leftover is coming.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10053
Issue ID: 10053
Summary: liblber/idtest.c (and psap.h dependency) irrelevant to
OpenLDAP
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: libraries
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
configure.ac checks for psap.h presence, the only user being liblber's idtest.c
- a test program that uses none of liblber API and claims to be part of ISODE
X.500 code.
I'm tempted to remove the configure check and the source file, letting that
project adopt it if they still use it for something.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9497
Issue ID: 9497
Summary: back-ldif: test022-ppolicy failure
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp
Target Milestone: ---
The test022-ppolicy with back-ldif fail for two issue.
1. too short pwdMaxAge
~~~
$ ./run -b ldif test022-ppolicy
(snip)
Testing password expiration
Waiting seconds for password to expire...
sleep: missing operand
Try 'sleep --help' for more information.
Password expiration test failed
~~~
The script tries test for lockout and then a test for password expiration.
It will fail if the password has expired(pwdMaxAge: 30) by the time it starts
the password expiration test.
This is a timing issue and not directly caused by back-ldif.
However, the issue is reproduced only with back-ldif in my environment.
This test passed in my environment by extending pwdMaxAge by 5 seconds, but
there may be a better way.
2. duplicate ldap control response
~~~
Reconfiguring policy to remove grace logins...
Clearing forced reset...
expr: syntax error: unexpected argument '15'
Testing password expiration
Waiting seconds for password to expire...
sleep: missing operand
Try 'sleep --help' for more information.
~~~
This is back-ldif issue.
back-ldif responds duplicate ldap control response.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9739
Issue ID: 9739
Summary: Undefined reference to ber_sockbuf_io_udp in 2.6.0
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: simon.pichugin(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
While I was trying to build OpenLDAP 2.6 on Fedora Rawhide I've got the error
message:
/usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to
`ber_sockbuf_io_udp'
I've checked commits from https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 and
found that 'ber_sockbuf_io_udp' was not added to
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/liblber/…
I've asked on the project's mailing list and got a reply:
"That symbol only exists if OpenLDAP is built with LDAP_CONNECTIONLESS
defined, which is not a supported feature. Feel free to file a bug report
at https://bugs.openldap.org/"
https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-technical@openldap.org/…
Hence, creating the bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9593
Issue ID: 9593
Summary: excessive null check in set_chase()
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: grapvar(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Looks like slap_set_join( cp, nset, '|', vals ) can't return null, so return
value at line 411 should be treated like one at line 402:
servers/slapd/sets.c:399, set_chase():
for ( i = 0; !BER_BVISNULL( &set[ i ] ); i++ ) {
vals = gatherer( cp, &set[ i ], desc );
if ( vals != NULL ) {
/*402: */ nset = slap_set_join( cp, nset, '|', vals );
}
}
ber_bvarray_free_x( set, cp->set_op->o_tmpmemctx );
if ( closure ) {
for ( i = 0; !BER_BVISNULL( &nset[ i ] ); i++ ) {
vals = gatherer( cp, &nset[ i ], desc );
if ( vals != NULL ) {
/*411: */ nset = slap_set_join( cp, nset, '|', vals );
if ( nset == NULL ) {
break;
}
}
}
}
diff --git a/servers/slapd/sets.c b/servers/slapd/sets.c
index fc7b72c8b..17a6ec2c1 100644
--- a/servers/slapd/sets.c
+++ b/servers/slapd/sets.c
@@ -409,9 +409,6 @@ set_chase( SLAP_SET_GATHER gatherer,
vals = gatherer( cp, &nset[ i ], desc );
if ( vals != NULL ) {
nset = slap_set_join( cp, nset, '|', vals );
- if ( nset == NULL ) {
- break;
- }
If I'm wrong, return value at line 402 must be checked for null.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9651
Issue ID: 9651
Summary: Add some kind of rate limiting option to ldapmodify
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: ---
Component: client tools
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
When using ldapmodify to replay a testing workload it would be useful to be
able to specify a request rate, instead of just performing multiple operations
in immediate succession. As a simpler alternative, just being able to specify a
time interval between operations would be helpful.
As an even greater future enhancement, it would be nice to have an option to
replay an accesslog.ldif directly, using its embedded timestamps to control the
time interval between operations. Currently this isn't feasible since reqstart
timestamps only have 1-second granularity, the fraction part is a linear
counter and not a microsecond value. The reqStart fraction would need to be
extended to 9 decimal places with full nanosecond resolution in order to be
usable as actual fractional time. We already know that microsecond resolution
is insufficient to avoid frequent collisions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10085
Issue ID: 10085
Summary: test029 can't pass with SLAPD_USE_SASL is set
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: test suite
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Running make test with SLAPD_USE_SASL set will fail test029. There is even a
comment there that we can't support that functionality as-is when SASL binds
are configured. We should probably remove that part of the test or skip it
unconditionally for now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9667
Issue ID: 9667
Summary: 2.6 to 2.7 upgrade documentation
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Need to document any upgrade information for going from 2.6 to 2.7
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10160
Issue ID: 10160
Summary: Add negset and negurl for slapo-constraint
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: manu(a)netbsd.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 1003
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=1003&action=edit
Add negset and negurl for slapo-constraint
Add negset and negurl constraints for slapo-constraint. THe two new types are
logical not of set and url. They will fire a constraint violation if the set or
LDAP URL query is non empty.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.