https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9564
Issue ID: 9564
Summary: Race condition with freeing the spilled pages from
transaction
Product: LMDB
Version: 0.9.29
Hardware: Other
OS: Mac OS
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: liblmdb
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: kriszyp(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 825
--> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=825&action=edit
Free the spilled pages and dirty overflows before unlocking the write mutex
The spilled pages (a transaction's mt_spill_pgs) is freed *after* a write
transaction's mutex is unlocked (in mdb.master3). This can result in a race
condition where a second transaction can start and subsequently assign a new
mt_spill_pgs list to the transaction structure that it reuses. If this occurs
after the first transaction unlocks the mutex, but before it performs the free
operation on mt_spill_pgs, then the first transaction will end up calling a
free on the same spilled page list as the second transaction, resulting in a
double free (and crash).
It would seem to be an extremely unlikely scenario to actually happen, since
the free call is literally the next operation after the mutex is unlocked, and
the second transaction would need to make it all the way to the point of saving
the freelist before a page spill list is likely to be allocated. Consequently,
this probably has rarely happened. However, one of our users (see
https://github.com/DoctorEvidence/lmdb-store/issues/48 for the discussion) has
noticed this occurring, and it seems that it may be particularly likely to
happen on MacOS on the new M1 silicon. Perhaps there is some peculiarity to how
the threads are more likely to yield execution after a mutex unlock, I am not
sure. I was able to reproduce the issue by intentionally manipulating the
timing (sleeping before the free) to verify that the race condition is
technically feasible, and apparently this can happen "in the wild" on MacOS, at
least with an M1.
It is also worth noting that this is due to (or a regression from) the fix for
ITS#9155
(https://github.com/LMDB/lmdb/commit/cb256f409bb53efeda4ac69ee8165a0b4fc1a277)
where the free call was moved outside the conditional (for having a parent)
that had previously never been executed after the mutex is unlocked, but now is
called after the unlock.
Anyway, the solution is relatively simple, the free call simply has to be moved
above the unlock. In my patch, I also moved the free call for mt_dirty_ovs. I
am not sure what OVERFLOW_NOTYET/mt_dirty_ovs is for, but presumably it should
be handled the same. This could alternately be solved by saving the reference
to these lists before unlocking, and freeing after unlocking, which would
slightly decrease the amount of processing within the mutex guarded code. Let
me know if you prefer a patch that does that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9739
Issue ID: 9739
Summary: Undefined reference to ber_sockbuf_io_udp in 2.6.0
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: simon.pichugin(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
While I was trying to build OpenLDAP 2.6 on Fedora Rawhide I've got the error
message:
/usr/bin/ld: ./.libs/libldap.so: undefined reference to
`ber_sockbuf_io_udp'
I've checked commits from https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 and
found that 'ber_sockbuf_io_udp' was not added to
https://git.openldap.org/openldap/openldap/-/blob/master/libraries/liblber/…
I've asked on the project's mailing list and got a reply:
"That symbol only exists if OpenLDAP is built with LDAP_CONNECTIONLESS
defined, which is not a supported feature. Feel free to file a bug report
at https://bugs.openldap.org/"
https://lists.openldap.org/hyperkitty/list/openldap-technical@openldap.org/…
Hence, creating the bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9343
Issue ID: 9343
Summary: Expand ppolicy policy configuration to allow URL
filter
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Currently, ppolicy only supports a single global default policy, and past that
any policies must be manually added to a given user entry if they are supposed
to have something other than the default policy.
Also, some sites want no default policy, and only a specific subset to have a
policy applied to them.
For both of these cases, it would be helpful if it were possible to configure a
policy to apply to a set of users via a URL similar to the way we handle
creating groups of users in dynlist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9186
Bug ID: 9186
Summary: RFE: More metrics in cn=monitor
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com
Target Milestone: ---
Currently I'm grepping metrics from syslog with mtail:
https://gitlab.com/ae-dir/ansible-ae-dir-server/-/blob/master/templates/mta…
With a new binary logging this is not possible anymore.
Thus it would be nice if cn=monitor provides more metrics.
1. Overall connection count per listener starting at 0 when started. This would
be a simple counter added to:
entries cn=Listener 0,cn=Listeners,cn=Monitor
2. Counter for the various "deferring" messages separated by the reason for
deferring.
3. Counters for all possible result codes. In my mtail program I also label it
with the result type.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10092
Issue ID: 10092
Summary: Local logging doesn't build on Windows
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
slapd/logging.c uses writev() to write a prefix and the log message together in
one call. This feature doesn't exist on Windows. The closest equivalent,
WriteFileGather, only works on page sized and aligned writes. On Windows the
only way to write as desired is to copy the message into a new buffer first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10140
Issue ID: 10140
Summary: Add microsecond timestamp format for local file
logging
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: gnoe(a)symas.com
Target Milestone: ---
Add microsecond-level timestamps to local file logging.
Format is:
"YYYY-mm-ddTHH:MM:SS.ffffffZ"
The attached patch file is derived from OpenLDAP Software. All of the
modifications to OpenLDAP Software represented in the following patch(es) were
developed by Gregory Noe gnoe(a)symas.com. I have not assigned rights and/or
interest in this work to any party.
The attached modifications to OpenLDAP Software are subject to the following
notice:
Copyright 2023 Gregory Noe
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted only as authorized by the OpenLDAP Public License.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9849
Issue ID: 9849
Summary: Update website to support LTS and Feature releases
Product: website
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: website
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: mnormann(a)symas.com
Target Milestone: ---
Modify .wlmrc variable names and website content to handle both Feature Release
and Long Term Support release.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10020
Issue ID: 10020
Summary: dynlist's @groupOfUniqueNames is considered only for
the first configuration line
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.13
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: msl(a)touk.pl
Target Milestone: ---
If we consider the following configuration of dynlist:
{0}toukPerson labeledURI uniqueMember+memberOf@groupOfUniqueNames
{1}groupOfURLs memberURL uniqueMember+dgMemberOf@groupOfUniqueNames
The {0} entry will correctly populate the memberOf relatively to static group
membership.
The {1} entry will produce dgMemberOf with dynamic group membership correctly
(based on memberURL query) but it will not populate static entries IF {0} entry
in configuration is present. IF I remove {0} from the dynlist configuration -
or - remove @groupOfUniqueNames part from this configuration line, then both
dynamic and static entries will be populated correctly for {1}.
So the effects are as follows on some user entry:
if both {0} and {1} are present - {1} produced only dynamic groups:
memberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
memberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
dgMemberOf: cn=dyntouk,ou=dyntest,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
if both {0} and {1} are present and @groupOfUniqueNames is removed from {0} -
{1} produced static+dynamic groups:
dgMemberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
dgMemberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
dgMemberOf: cn=dyntouk,ou=dyntest,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
If only {1} is present - {1} produced static+dynamic groups:
dgMemberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
dgMemberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
dgMemberOf: cn=dyntouk,ou=dyntest,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
For completness - if only {0} is present:
memberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
memberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
I would expect this behavior to be correct for the first case - {0} and {1}.
memberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
memberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
dgMemberOf: cn=dyntouk,ou=dyntest,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
dgMemberOf: cn=adm,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
dgMemberOf: cn=touk,ou=touk,ou=group,dc=touk,dc=pl
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9934
Issue ID: 9934
Summary: slapd-config(5) should document how to store
certificates for slapd usage
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.5.13
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: documentation
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Commit 7b41feed83b expanded the ability of cn=config to save the certificates
used for TLS by slapd directly in the config database. However the
documentation for the new parameters was never added to the slapd-config(5) man
page.
olcTLSCACertificate $ olcTLSCertificate $ olcTLSCertificateKey
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10163
Issue ID: 10163
Summary: Cleanup configure/test integration
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: build
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
The sed commandline configure uses to perform substitutions is getting unwieldy
and may be exceeding platform limits on various systems.
All of the BUILD_xxx substitutions for overlays are only used in tests/run.in.
They could be completely removed, and instead each of the enabled overlays
could be emitted into a separate file that just gets included by the test
scripts. There's no need for them to be part of the sed invocation at all.
There's also leftover BUILD_xxx cruft from backends that we've removed (e.g.
back-shell BUILD_SHELL) that nothing else in the tree references any more.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.