openldap-bugs May 2021

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
147 discussions

[Issue 9534] New: Persistent test043 failures
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Jul '22

07 Jul '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9534 Issue ID: 9534 Summary: Persistent test043 failures Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- In testing current RE25 as of 4/23/2021 (73b2769d05529a7d474661023f2c4f3a931417b2) test043 is sporadically failing. Examining the testrun log, it appears replication never even initiated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 10

[Issue 9468] New: slapd-ldap does anonymous bind even if rebind-as-user is set
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 30 Jun '22

30 Jun '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9468 Issue ID: 9468 Summary: slapd-ldap does anonymous bind even if rebind-as-user is set Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: tero.saarni(a)est.tech Target Milestone: --- When back-ldap retries bind operation after connection retry, it will do it as anonymous even if rebind-as-user is set to yes. Expected behavior is that (re)bind is done with user's credentials from the initial bind operation. I observed following (Warning: I might have understood details of the code incorrectly): When rebind-as-user is set and bind operation from client is processed, proxy will copy the credentials to ldapconn_t representing the remote LDAP connection. When remote LDAP connection is closed (e.g. by the proxy itself due to timeout), the bind credentials information is lost when freeing the old ldapconn_t. At this point, client still holds the connection to proxy and is unaware of the remote connection being lost. Proxy then re-establishes the connection and "synthetically" generates new bind itself, but since it does not have the credentials stored in memory anymore, it sends anonymous bind on behalf of the client. As a side effect, slapd currently crashes if remote server does not allow anonymous bind and responds with InvalidCredentials instead. The crash is due to assert(), which is handled in separate issue https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9288 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 12

[Issue 9385] New: Opening an env with MDB_NOSUBDIR with no existing file returns error
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 13 May '22

13 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9385 Issue ID: 9385 Summary: Opening an env with MDB_NOSUBDIR with no existing file returns error Product: LMDB Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: Mac OS Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: liblmdb Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: kriszyp(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 776 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=776&action=edit A fix to tolerate stat call on non-existing file Calling mdb_env_open with a file path to a file that doesn't exist yet, with MDB_NOSUBDIR on a non-Windows OS will return an error indicating that the file doesn't exist. This is supposed to create a new file, and works properly on the mdb.master branch, and still functions properly on Windows. The error is due to the stat() call in mdb_env_open prior to the file existing. I attached a patch that tolerates the absence of the file before checking if the file is on a block device. I am not sure if this is the appropriate fix, or if would be better to move this check later in mdb_env_open after the file is created, or alternately, determining the parent directory and calling stat on that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 1

[Issue 9403] New: add option to completely disable syslog logging
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 May '22

12 May '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9403 Issue ID: 9403 Summary: add option to completely disable syslog logging Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.45 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: cvuillemez(a)yahoo.fr Target Milestone: --- For auditing purpose, I need to enable "stats" loglevel. So on heavy load, slapd send lots of events to local syslog socket /dev/log, when compiled with LDAP_SYSLOG (on Debian / Ubuntu). It worked fine on old systems with a simple syslog service. But when upgrading on system with journald+syslog, CPU "overhead" becomes totally crazy. It would be great to have an option at run time to completely disable syslog logging, or/and use a cutom socket, e.g. /run/systemd/journal/syslog to bypass journald service. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 9497] New: back-ldif: test022-ppolicy failure
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 07 Mar '22

07 Mar '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9497 Issue ID: 9497 Summary: back-ldif: test022-ppolicy failure Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp Target Milestone: --- The test022-ppolicy with back-ldif fail for two issue. 1. too short pwdMaxAge ~~~ $ ./run -b ldif test022-ppolicy (snip) Testing password expiration Waiting seconds for password to expire... sleep: missing operand Try 'sleep --help' for more information. Password expiration test failed ~~~ The script tries test for lockout and then a test for password expiration. It will fail if the password has expired(pwdMaxAge: 30) by the time it starts the password expiration test. This is a timing issue and not directly caused by back-ldif. However, the issue is reproduced only with back-ldif in my environment. This test passed in my environment by extending pwdMaxAge by 5 seconds, but there may be a better way. 2. duplicate ldap control response ~~~ Reconfiguring policy to remove grace logins... Clearing forced reset... expr: syntax error: unexpected argument '15' Testing password expiration Waiting seconds for password to expire... sleep: missing operand Try 'sleep --help' for more information. ~~~ This is back-ldif issue. back-ldif responds duplicate ldap control response. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 8

[Bug 9256] New: The ACLs required for SASL binding are not fully documented
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 28 Feb '22

28 Feb '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9256 Bug ID: 9256 Summary: The ACLs required for SASL binding are not fully documented Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: kop(a)karlpinc.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 727 --> https://bugs.openldap.org/attachment.cgi?id=727&action=edit Patch massaging the SASL binding requirement docs While some ACL requirements for SASL binding are documented, some are not. E.g, that olcAuthzRegexp requires =x on objectClass when direct DN mapping is not documented. Other requirements can be reasoned out based on the existing documentation, but this can be very difficult when unfamiliar with all the moving parts and the places they are documented. E.g. knowing that (objectClass=*) is the default filter, and that there's _always_ _some_ filter, and connecting this with ACLs required to do search-based SASL mapping. The attached patch brings all the SASL binding requirements together in one place in the docs and makes everything explicit. The word "SASL" is included, for those searching for that keyword. I, Karl O. Pinc, hereby place the following modifications to OpenLDAP Software (and only these modifications) into the public domain. Hence, these modifications may be freely used and/or redistributed for any purpose with or without attribution and/or other notice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 27

[Issue 9502] New: Implement TCP_USER_TIMEOUT in meta and asyncmeta
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '22

18 Feb '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9502 Issue ID: 9502 Summary: Implement TCP_USER_TIMEOUT in meta and asyncmeta Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: nivanova(a)symas.com Target Milestone: --- Implement TCP_USER_TIMEOUT as an option to libldap and as a configuration option in back-meta and back-asyncmeta -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Bug 9189] New: Add GSSAPI channel-bindings support
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 18 Feb '22

18 Feb '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9189 Bug ID: 9189 Summary: Add GSSAPI channel-bindings support Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: libraries Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: iboukris(a)gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Recently MS has announce they plan to enforce channel-bindings for LDAP over TLS (ADV190023). To support it on client side, we need to pass "tls-endpoint" bindings (RFC 5929) to the SASL plugin, and make use of that in GSSAPI. See also: https://github.com/cyrusimap/cyrus-sasl/pull/601 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

[Issue 9350] New: Expand test suite for null base
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 31 Jan '22

31 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9350 Issue ID: 9350 Summary: Expand test suite for null base Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: build Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- Currently we have no tests that use the empty suffix (null base). This is an entirely valid configuration setup, and there are unique challenges and bugs that crop up with this usage. We need to ensure we're covering this use case, particularly with syncrepl and delta-syncrepl configurations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9538] New: Accesslog entryCSN ordering is not always monotonous
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9538 Issue ID: 9538 Summary: Accesslog entryCSN ordering is not always monotonous Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- For delta-sync replication, we rely on CSN order being preserved at all times. When logops includes anything more than "writes", we don't use li_op_rmutex to maintain serialisation. A concurrent write and another operation (like bind) can have the write have its csn assigned before the bind. But before the write finishes on the main DB and is logged, the bind has already hit accesslog. This entry out of order doesn't match the usual filter, so non-persist sessions will not notice, however running persist sessions could get a new cookie sent, depending on how things are ordered when they hit syncprov. A sample: ---- 8< ---- Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 ADD dn="uid=dm01-R1H2-41660,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com" Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=reqStart=20210426195604.000350Z,cn=accesslog on opc=0x7d3d2800dc50 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_get_csn: conn=1003 op=42 generated new csn=20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 manage=1 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7d3d38148f60 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 BIND dn="dc=example,dc=com" method=128 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 BIND dn="dc=example,dc=com" mech=SIMPLE bind_ssf=0 ssf=256 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 RESULT tag=105 err=0 qtime=0.005874 etime=0.015182 text= Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_get_csn: conn=1005 op=1 generated new csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 manage=1 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x561f09113f80 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=reqStart=20210426195604.000364Z,cn=accesslog on opc=0x561f0900fcf0 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1002 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1001 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1000 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x561f09113f80 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 RESULT tag=97 err=0 qtime=0.000020 etime=0.004297 text= Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7d3d38148250 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7d3d38148250 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7d3d38148f60 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 ---- 8< ---- Example entries in the order slapcat sees them: ---- 8< ---- dn: reqStart=20210426195604.000364Z,cn=accesslog objectClass: auditBind reqStart: 20210426195604.000364Z reqEnd: 20210426195604.000365Z reqType: bind entryCSN: 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 dn: reqStart=20210426195604.000351Z,cn=accesslog objectClass: auditAdd reqStart: 20210426195604.000351Z reqEnd: 20210426195604.000366Z reqType: add entryCSN: 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 ---- 8< ---- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 20

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
15
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs May 2021