https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9766
Issue ID: 9766
Summary: slapo-autogroup handling of X-VALUES ORDERED is
incorrect
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: contrib
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
When adding a value to the beginning of the list (position {0}), internally, it
gets added to the end instead, this is incorrect.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9760
Issue ID: 9760
Summary: back-wt is not set "SLAP_DBFLAG_CLEAN"
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp
Target Milestone: ---
https://github.com/osstech-jp/openldap/issues/10
yasumatk says:
> If "SLAP_DBFLAG_CLEAN" is not set for a backend database, the initialization process of the syncprov overlay reads all entries in the backend database.
As a result, slapd startup time will increase on the back-wt database with a
large number of entries.
So, back-wt should be set "SLAP_DBFLAG_CLEAN" in back-wt/init.c.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9753
Issue ID: 9753
Summary: back-mdb index incorrect on modify/replace
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.6
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: backends
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
When doing a modify/replace on an indexed attribute, back-mdb only deletes the
old values from the index and doesn't add the new values into the index.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9538
Issue ID: 9538
Summary: Accesslog entryCSN ordering is not always monotonous
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
For delta-sync replication, we rely on CSN order being preserved at all times.
When logops includes anything more than "writes", we don't use li_op_rmutex to
maintain serialisation. A concurrent write and another operation (like bind)
can have the write have its csn assigned before the bind. But before the write
finishes on the main DB and is logged, the bind has already hit accesslog.
This entry out of order doesn't match the usual filter, so non-persist sessions
will not notice, however running persist sessions could get a new cookie sent,
depending on how things are ordered when they hit syncprov.
A sample:
---- 8< ----
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 ADD
dn="uid=dm01-R1H2-41660,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com"
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 syncprov_matchops:
recording uuid for dn=reqStart=20210426195604.000350Z,cn=accesslog on
opc=0x7d3d2800dc50
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_get_csn: conn=1003 op=42 generated
new csn=20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 manage=1
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7d3d38148f60
20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 BIND
dn="dc=example,dc=com" method=128
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 BIND
dn="dc=example,dc=com" mech=SIMPLE bind_ssf=0 ssf=256
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 RESULT tag=105 err=0
qtime=0.005874 etime=0.015182 text=
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_get_csn: conn=1005 op=1 generated
new csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 manage=1
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x561f09113f80
20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 syncprov_matchops:
recording uuid for dn=reqStart=20210426195604.000364Z,cn=accesslog on
opc=0x561f0900fcf0
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1002 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a
new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1001 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a
new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1000 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a
new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing
0x561f09113f80 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 RESULT tag=97 err=0
qtime=0.000020 etime=0.004297 text=
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7d3d38148250
20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing
0x7d3d38148250 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000
Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing
0x7d3d38148f60 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000
---- 8< ----
Example entries in the order slapcat sees them:
---- 8< ----
dn: reqStart=20210426195604.000364Z,cn=accesslog
objectClass: auditBind
reqStart: 20210426195604.000364Z
reqEnd: 20210426195604.000365Z
reqType: bind
entryCSN: 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000
dn: reqStart=20210426195604.000351Z,cn=accesslog
objectClass: auditAdd
reqStart: 20210426195604.000351Z
reqEnd: 20210426195604.000366Z
reqType: add
entryCSN: 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000
---- 8< ----
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9576
Issue ID: 9576
Summary: Add ConfigTable link into ConfigArgs
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net
Target Milestone: ---
Would make it possible to examine defaults if necessary.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9773
Issue ID: 9773
Summary: slapo-allowed should also list "operational"
attributes
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.6.0
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: contrib
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com
Target Milestone: ---
When using slapo-allowed a client may disable input fields for attributes not
listed in 'allowedAttributesEffective'. This helps the user to understand that
he/she should not even try to modify the attribute (better UX).
But slapo-allowed never shows operational attributes in
allowedAttributesEffective. In most use-cases this is understandable but there
are some nice use-cases (e.g. setting pwdPolicySubentry) where it should be
possible for the client to display an enabled input field even for operational
attributes.
See also:
* Discussion in ITS#9671
* https://code.stroeder.com/ldap/web2ldap/issues/24
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8988
--- Comment #22 from noloader(a)gmail.com <noloader(a)gmail.com> ---
On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:59 AM Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote:
>
> noloader(a)gmail.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 9:32 AM Howard Chu <hyc(a)symas.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> noloader(a)gmail.com wrote:
> >> ...
> >>> I encourage OpenLDAP to fix the undefined behavior. OpenLDAP is an
> >>> important project, and the undefined behavior is causing too many
> >>> tangential problems.
> >>
> >> Undefined behavior is not a bug, nor is it prohibited by the C spec. It is a necessary
> >> part of the language for its intended use as a system programming language, writing
> >> machine-specific programs. Anyone who says it is prohibited by the spec is wrong.
The kernel recently got bitten using the same pattern of unaligned
short pointers through casts. GCC produced code which corrupted
initramfs during unpacking.
See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363.
OpenLDAP should fix that code.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9282
Issue ID: 9282
Summary: Syncrepl re-creates deleted entry
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.50
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: slapd
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: quanah(a)openldap.org
Target Milestone: ---
Scenario:
2 node Multi-provider replication
Add database to provider A
ensure database replicates to provider B
Stop provider A
delete entry on provider B
Start provider A
Wait for provider B to reconnect to provider A
Deleted entry re-appears
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.
https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9765
Issue ID: 9765
Summary: slapd crash
Product: OpenLDAP
Version: 2.4.46
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: needs_review
Severity: normal
Priority: ---
Component: overlays
Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org
Reporter: shivaprasadtp(a)yahoo.in
Target Milestone: ---
Start-up two slapd server instances. Configure syncreply overlay with one of
the servers as a provider and the other one as consumer. Create around 100
users. Now start changing syncrepl configuration for one of the slapd servers,
lets say the consumer server, in a loop with 5 seconds delay. After few mins
the slapd server crashes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the issue.