openldap-bugs December 2021

openldap-bugs@openldap.org

1 participants
122 discussions

[Issue 9747] New: dynlist overlay breaks member compare operation for groups
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9747 Issue ID: 9747 Summary: dynlist overlay breaks member compare operation for groups Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.8 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: henson(a)acm.org Target Milestone: --- Given the following group: dn: uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu objectClass: groupOfNames objectClass: cppGroup objectClass: posixGroup uid: unxadmin cn: Unix Administrators gidNumber: 17730 member: member: uid=gkuri,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu member: uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu memberUid: gkuri memberUid: henson and the following dynlist config: dynlist-attrset groupOfURLs memberURL member+memberOf@groupOfNames ldap compare operations checking group membership fail erroneously: # ldapcompare -x -H ldaps://ldap-vmc-01.ldap.cpp.edu/ uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu member:uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu FALSE If the dynlist-attrset configuration is removed, the compare works as expected: # ldapcompare -x -H ldaps://ldap-vmc-01.ldap.cpp.edu/ uid=unxadmin,ou=group,dc=cpp,dc=edu member:uid=henson,ou=user,dc=cpp,dc=edu TRUE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 9

[Issue 9749] New: logoldattr documentation is misleading
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9749 Issue ID: 9749 Summary: logoldattr documentation is misleading Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- Reading the accesslog manpage, someone might expect that attributes specified in logoldattr would be logged regardless of whether the entry being modified matches any of the configured filters. This is not the case and should be clarified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 5

[Issue 9707] New: Documentation synchronisation ODSEE --> openldap
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9707 Issue ID: 9707 Summary: Documentation synchronisation ODSEE --> openldap Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: documentation Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: laurent.revillion(a)icloud.com Target Milestone: --- There is no documentation about the synchronisation between ODSEE and Openldap 2.5. Will there be one? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 16

[Issue 9766] New: slapo-autogroup handling of X-VALUES ORDERED is incorrect
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9766 Issue ID: 9766 Summary: slapo-autogroup handling of X-VALUES ORDERED is incorrect Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: contrib Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- When adding a value to the beginning of the list (position {0}), internally, it gets added to the end instead, this is incorrect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9760] New: back-wt is not set "SLAP_DBFLAG_CLEAN"
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9760 Issue ID: 9760 Summary: back-wt is not set "SLAP_DBFLAG_CLEAN" Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hamano(a)osstech.co.jp Target Milestone: --- https://github.com/osstech-jp/openldap/issues/10 yasumatk says: > If "SLAP_DBFLAG_CLEAN" is not set for a backend database, the initialization process of the syncprov overlay reads all entries in the backend database. As a result, slapd startup time will increase on the back-wt database with a large number of entries. So, back-wt should be set "SLAP_DBFLAG_CLEAN" in back-wt/init.c. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9753] New: back-mdb index incorrect on modify/replace
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 20 Jan '22

20 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9753 Issue ID: 9753 Summary: back-mdb index incorrect on modify/replace Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.4.6 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: backends Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: hyc(a)openldap.org Target Milestone: --- When doing a modify/replace on an indexed attribute, back-mdb only deletes the old values from the index and doesn't add the new values into the index. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 24

[Issue 9538] New: Accesslog entryCSN ordering is not always monotonous
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9538 Issue ID: 9538 Summary: Accesslog entryCSN ordering is not always monotonous Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- For delta-sync replication, we rely on CSN order being preserved at all times. When logops includes anything more than "writes", we don't use li_op_rmutex to maintain serialisation. A concurrent write and another operation (like bind) can have the write have its csn assigned before the bind. But before the write finishes on the main DB and is logged, the bind has already hit accesslog. This entry out of order doesn't match the usual filter, so non-persist sessions will not notice, however running persist sessions could get a new cookie sent, depending on how things are ordered when they hit syncprov. A sample: ---- 8< ---- Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 ADD dn="uid=dm01-R1H2-41660,ou=People,dc=example,dc=com" Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=reqStart=20210426195604.000350Z,cn=accesslog on opc=0x7d3d2800dc50 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_get_csn: conn=1003 op=42 generated new csn=20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 manage=1 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7d3d38148f60 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 BIND dn="dc=example,dc=com" method=128 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 BIND dn="dc=example,dc=com" mech=SIMPLE bind_ssf=0 ssf=256 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1003 op=41 RESULT tag=105 err=0 qtime=0.005874 etime=0.015182 text= Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_get_csn: conn=1005 op=1 generated new csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 manage=1 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x561f09113f80 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 syncprov_matchops: recording uuid for dn=reqStart=20210426195604.000364Z,cn=accesslog on opc=0x561f0900fcf0 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1002 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1001 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1000 op=2 syncprov_qresp: set up a new syncres mode=4 csn=20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x561f09113f80 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: conn=1005 op=1 RESULT tag=97 err=0 qtime=0.000020 etime=0.004297 text= Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_queue_csn: queueing 0x7d3d38148250 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7d3d38148250 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 Apr 26 19:56:04 localhost slapd[43930]: slap_graduate_commit_csn: removing 0x7d3d38148f60 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 ---- 8< ---- Example entries in the order slapcat sees them: ---- 8< ---- dn: reqStart=20210426195604.000364Z,cn=accesslog objectClass: auditBind reqStart: 20210426195604.000364Z reqEnd: 20210426195604.000365Z reqType: bind entryCSN: 20210426195604.558683Z#000000#002#000000 dn: reqStart=20210426195604.000351Z,cn=accesslog objectClass: auditAdd reqStart: 20210426195604.000351Z reqEnd: 20210426195604.000366Z reqType: add entryCSN: 20210426195604.556053Z#000000#002#000000 ---- 8< ---- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 20

[Issue 9768] New: slapo-translucent handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9768 Issue ID: 9768 Summary: slapo-translucent handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- If olcTranslucentLocal/olcTranslucentRemote is passed multiple attribute names in a single value that (or one further down the list) is later removed, the overlay doesn't handle its removal correctly. We should encourage users to provide a single attribute name per value, just like we do in EMIT for those provided in slapd.conf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 3

[Issue 9767] New: slapo-unique handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9767 Issue ID: 9767 Summary: slapo-unique handling of deletion of multi-valued configuration attributes removes wrong value from list Product: OpenLDAP Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: needs_review Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: overlays Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: ondra(a)mistotebe.net Target Milestone: --- If olcUniqueIgnore/olcUniqueAttribute is passed multiple names in a single value that is later removed, the overlay doesn't handle its removal correctly. We should encourage users to provide a single attribute name per value, just like we do in EMIT for those provided in slapd.conf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 4

[Issue 9556] New: slapd-config should return invalidAttributeSyntax if parsing schema description fails
by openldap-its＠openldap.org 12 Jan '22

12 Jan '22

https://bugs.openldap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9556 Issue ID: 9556 Summary: slapd-config should return invalidAttributeSyntax if parsing schema description fails Product: OpenLDAP Version: 2.5.4 Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: --- Component: slapd Assignee: bugs(a)openldap.org Reporter: michael(a)stroeder.com Target Milestone: --- I'm currently testing error handling and interacting with LDAP clients (e.g. my web2ldap). Sending an invalid attribute type description results in an error (as expected) returned by slapd-config: RESULT tag=103 err=80 qtime=0.000032 etime=0.001271 text=olcAttributeTypes: Unexpected token before SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 ) But result code other(80) seems not very useful. It's too unspecific to decide on specific error handling. It would be much more useful if slapd-config returns invalidAttributeSyntax(21) in this case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the issue.

1 6

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

openldap-bugs December 2021